Problems and Prospects for the Formation of a General Methodology of Knowledge. Philosophical Reflections

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 PHILOSOPHY Filosofija-Sociologija Pub Date : 2022-09-13 DOI:10.6001/fil-soc.v33i3.4765
Z. Stezhko, N. Shalimova
{"title":"Problems and Prospects for the Formation of a General Methodology of Knowledge. Philosophical Reflections","authors":"Z. Stezhko, N. Shalimova","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.v33i3.4765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses the problems and possibilities of forming a general methodological paradigm for the study, explanation and forecasting of social processes – in the context of the philosophical concepts of G. Hegel and F. Nietzsche. In particular, a fundamental possibility for forming a general methodological paradigm based on a dynamic balance of not optimal, but possible is analysed. The paper outlines the positive and negative aspects of the methodological paradigms of rationalism and irrationalism (postmodernism); points out the possibility of terminological discourse in determining the content of concepts and categories; emphasises the efficiency of the methodological paradigm of rationalism on the example of the analysis and implementation of the philosophical category ‘measure’; substantiates the need for improvement of the spiritual priorities of various groups of the population – with a special emphasis on the layer of politicians.","PeriodicalId":43648,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija-Sociologija","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofija-Sociologija","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.v33i3.4765","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article analyses the problems and possibilities of forming a general methodological paradigm for the study, explanation and forecasting of social processes – in the context of the philosophical concepts of G. Hegel and F. Nietzsche. In particular, a fundamental possibility for forming a general methodological paradigm based on a dynamic balance of not optimal, but possible is analysed. The paper outlines the positive and negative aspects of the methodological paradigms of rationalism and irrationalism (postmodernism); points out the possibility of terminological discourse in determining the content of concepts and categories; emphasises the efficiency of the methodological paradigm of rationalism on the example of the analysis and implementation of the philosophical category ‘measure’; substantiates the need for improvement of the spiritual priorities of various groups of the population – with a special emphasis on the layer of politicians.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
形成一般知识方法论的问题与展望。哲学反思
本文以黑格尔和尼采的哲学概念为背景,分析了形成研究、解释和预测社会过程的一般方法论范式的问题和可能性。特别地,分析了一种基于非最佳但可能的动态平衡而形成一般方法范式的基本可能性。本文概述了理性主义和非理性主义(后现代主义)方法论范式的积极和消极方面;指出术语语篇在确定概念和范畴的内容方面的可能性;以“测度”这一哲学范畴的分析与实施为例,强调理性主义方法论范式的有效性;证实需要改善人口各群体的精神优先次序- -特别强调政治家阶层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Demographic Continuity as a Necessary Condition of Performable Post-communist Token Social Restorations Laisvi ir laimingi? Laimės dinamika Lietuvoje kartų kaitos perspektyvoje Gyvenantys mobiliame pasaulyje: 1980–2000 m. gimusiųjų migraciniai ketinimai ir šeiminio gyvenimo įsivaizdavimas Nuo socialinio darbo profesijos link socialinio darbo profesinės veiklos lauko analizės Jaunuolių delinkventinis elgesys Lietuvoje: ką atskleidžia naujas delinkvencijos ir viktimizacijos tyrimas?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1