Probabilistic intake assessment and body burden estimation of dioxin-like substances in background conditions and during a short food contamination episode
B. Vrijens, S. Henauw, K. Dewettinck, W. Talloen, L. Goeyens, G. Backer, Jan L. Willems
{"title":"Probabilistic intake assessment and body burden estimation of dioxin-like substances in background conditions and during a short food contamination episode","authors":"B. Vrijens, S. Henauw, K. Dewettinck, W. Talloen, L. Goeyens, G. Backer, Jan L. Willems","doi":"10.1080/02652030210132409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective was to perform a dioxin body burden estimate based on a probabilistic intake assessment of PCDDs, PCDFs and dioxin-like PCBs because of the so-called 1999 ‘Belgian dioxin incident’. Monte Carlo simulation techniques were used to combine detailed 7-day food intake data on the individual level from a sample of 14–18-year-old adolescents with ‘background’ and ‘incident-related’ food contamination data. In background conditions, 3% of the adolescents had an intake <1 pg TEQ kg-1 bw day-1, while 85% had <4 pg TEQ kg-1 bw day-1. Milk and other dairy products were the basic source of dioxin-like contaminants, while fish constituted the main source at the higher percentiles of intake. During the dioxin incident, the estimated median dioxin intake showed a moderate increase. At the 99th percentile, the highest intake level, and the 95% upper bound uncertainty level, peak body burden—23.73 ng TEQ kg-1 bw—remained below body burdens that in the experimental animal or in man are accompanied by a population-based observable increase in the incidence of adverse effects. The 1999 Belgian dioxin incident most likely did not affect public health in Belgium in a measurable way, although exceptions remain possible on the individual level.","PeriodicalId":12310,"journal":{"name":"Food Additives & Contaminants","volume":"27 1","pages":"687 - 700"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Additives & Contaminants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030210132409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35
Abstract
The objective was to perform a dioxin body burden estimate based on a probabilistic intake assessment of PCDDs, PCDFs and dioxin-like PCBs because of the so-called 1999 ‘Belgian dioxin incident’. Monte Carlo simulation techniques were used to combine detailed 7-day food intake data on the individual level from a sample of 14–18-year-old adolescents with ‘background’ and ‘incident-related’ food contamination data. In background conditions, 3% of the adolescents had an intake <1 pg TEQ kg-1 bw day-1, while 85% had <4 pg TEQ kg-1 bw day-1. Milk and other dairy products were the basic source of dioxin-like contaminants, while fish constituted the main source at the higher percentiles of intake. During the dioxin incident, the estimated median dioxin intake showed a moderate increase. At the 99th percentile, the highest intake level, and the 95% upper bound uncertainty level, peak body burden—23.73 ng TEQ kg-1 bw—remained below body burdens that in the experimental animal or in man are accompanied by a population-based observable increase in the incidence of adverse effects. The 1999 Belgian dioxin incident most likely did not affect public health in Belgium in a measurable way, although exceptions remain possible on the individual level.