The Quality of Life of Trauma Patients with Splint Immobilization

Q3 Medicine Shiraz E Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI:10.5812/semj-136752
Mohamad Hoseini Kasnavieh, S. Mousavi, M. Veisi, A. Tahmasebi
{"title":"The Quality of Life of Trauma Patients with Splint Immobilization","authors":"Mohamad Hoseini Kasnavieh, S. Mousavi, M. Veisi, A. Tahmasebi","doi":"10.5812/semj-136752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Different countries have used different methods to reduce trauma-related mortality and its complications. Objectives: Splint is a temporary and conventional method of fixing an injured organ. Therefore, evaluating the quality of life in trauma patients with splint immobilization is important. Methods: This prospective study was performed on 287 trauma patients with splint immobilization in two baseline periods and one month later in Haft-e-Tir and Rasoul-e-Akram hospitals. The Data collection tool was the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire. Paired t-test was used to assess the changes in the quality of life. SPSS version 21 was used for statistical analysis. Results: The mean quality of life in the study's first phase was 76.31 ± 9.42, and one month after splint immobilization was 76.13 ± 8.98, and there was no significant difference between the two phases. The Splint immobilization of the patients significantly affected the quality of life in 5 out of 8 dimensions. Still, the intervention increased the scores in 3 dimensions and decreased scores in 2 dimensions. The results showed that social performance (P = 0.01), energy and vitality (P < 0.001), and emotional health (P < 0.001) increased, and physical performance (P = 0.01) and general health (P = 0.001) decreased, and they were significantly different in the two phases. There were no significant differences between emotional limitation, physical limitation, and pain in the two phases of the study. Conclusions: Splint immobilization of patients improved the quality of life in 5 out of 8 dimensions. After a month, the trauma-related mental and physical shock did not disappear, and even the patients were more sensitive to quality-of-life questions due to time spent with splint immobilization and familiarity with its limitations. The patients tried to reflect on their dissatisfaction with splint immobilization.","PeriodicalId":39157,"journal":{"name":"Shiraz E Medical Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shiraz E Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-136752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Different countries have used different methods to reduce trauma-related mortality and its complications. Objectives: Splint is a temporary and conventional method of fixing an injured organ. Therefore, evaluating the quality of life in trauma patients with splint immobilization is important. Methods: This prospective study was performed on 287 trauma patients with splint immobilization in two baseline periods and one month later in Haft-e-Tir and Rasoul-e-Akram hospitals. The Data collection tool was the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire. Paired t-test was used to assess the changes in the quality of life. SPSS version 21 was used for statistical analysis. Results: The mean quality of life in the study's first phase was 76.31 ± 9.42, and one month after splint immobilization was 76.13 ± 8.98, and there was no significant difference between the two phases. The Splint immobilization of the patients significantly affected the quality of life in 5 out of 8 dimensions. Still, the intervention increased the scores in 3 dimensions and decreased scores in 2 dimensions. The results showed that social performance (P = 0.01), energy and vitality (P < 0.001), and emotional health (P < 0.001) increased, and physical performance (P = 0.01) and general health (P = 0.001) decreased, and they were significantly different in the two phases. There were no significant differences between emotional limitation, physical limitation, and pain in the two phases of the study. Conclusions: Splint immobilization of patients improved the quality of life in 5 out of 8 dimensions. After a month, the trauma-related mental and physical shock did not disappear, and even the patients were more sensitive to quality-of-life questions due to time spent with splint immobilization and familiarity with its limitations. The patients tried to reflect on their dissatisfaction with splint immobilization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
夹板固定对创伤患者生活质量的影响
背景:不同的国家采用不同的方法来降低创伤相关死亡率及其并发症。目的:夹板是一种临时的、常规的固定器官损伤的方法。因此,评估夹板固定的创伤患者的生活质量是很重要的。方法:本前瞻性研究对Haft-e-Tir和Rasoul-e-Akram医院的287例创伤患者进行了两个基线期和一个月后的夹板固定。数据收集工具为SF-36生活质量问卷。采用配对t检验评估生活质量的变化。采用SPSS version 21进行统计分析。结果:研究一期患者平均生活质量为76.31±9.42,固定夹板1个月后平均生活质量为76.13±8.98,两期差异无统计学意义。患者的夹板固定在8个维度中的5个维度显著影响生活质量。干预提高了3个维度的得分,降低了2个维度的得分。结果表明:社会绩效(P = 0.01)、精力活力(P < 0.001)和情绪健康(P < 0.001)提高,身体绩效(P = 0.01)和总体健康(P = 0.001)降低,且在两个阶段存在显著差异。在两个阶段的研究中,情绪限制、身体限制和疼痛之间没有显著差异。结论:固定夹板可改善患者8个维度中的5个维度的生活质量。一个月后,创伤相关的精神和身体休克并没有消失,甚至患者对生活质量问题也更加敏感,因为他们使用夹板固定的时间更长,并且熟悉其局限性。患者试图反思他们对夹板固定的不满。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Shiraz E Medical Journal
Shiraz E Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Patterns of Midface and Mandible Fractures in a Government Hospital. Attitudes of Healthcare Professionals and Internship Students Toward Patient Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Qom, Iran, 2021 Diagnosis of Rib Fracture and Related Complications in Patients with Blunt Chest Wall Trauma Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography Scan Artificial Intelligence and Its Potential Applications to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic Exploring the Potential of Chatbots in Medical Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1