Comparison of Janda’s Muscle Energy Technique Vs Myofascial Release of Hamstrings on Back Range of Motion and Dysfunction in Adolescent girls with Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Anjali Choudhary, Jaspreet Kaur
{"title":"Comparison of Janda’s Muscle Energy Technique Vs Myofascial Release of Hamstrings on Back Range of Motion and Dysfunction in Adolescent girls with Nonspecific Low Back Pain","authors":"Anjali Choudhary, Jaspreet Kaur","doi":"10.32553/ijmsdr.v6i9.949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nonspecific Low Back Pain among the adolescent  girls is due to underlying predisposing factors like postural errors, lack of physical exercise in which Hamstrings tightness is a key contributing factor. \nMethodology: The research was experimental in nature. The subjects was selected through purposive sampling. 60 female collegiate girls was selected and divided into 3 groups. Group A include 20 subjects was given conventional treatment as Hot Pack on Hamstrings Muscle over the posterior aspect of thigh of both the lower limbs for 10 minutes. Then Lumbar Mobility Exercises was performed by subject. \nGroup B include 20 subjects was given conventional treatment as Hot Pack on Hamstrings Muscle over the posterior aspect of thigh of both the lower limbs for 10 minutes. Then Lumbar Mobility Exercises was performed by subject. \nGroup C  include 20 subjects was given  conventional treatment as Hot Pack on Hamstrings Muscle over the posterior aspect of thigh of both the lower limbs for 10 minutes. Then Lumbar Mobility Exercises was performed by subject. Pretest and Post test data for both the groups will be evaluated for Back Pain using Visual Analogue Scale and Back Dysfunction using Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire respectively. \nResult: The data was analysed by using paired and unpaired t-test. There were Significant differences in pre and post scores of Group B (MET) and Group C (MFR) when paired t-test was applied. When these groups were compared using unpaired t-test, all showed significant differences. Group B (MET) demonstrated more improvement than Group C (MFR) and Group A (control). However, Group C (MFR) showed significant improvement than Group A (control). \nConclusion: The study concluded that Muscle Energy Technique is better than Myofascial Release Technique in improving Back Range of Motion and Dysfunction among Adolescent Girls with Nonspecific Low Back Pain. There was a significant variation of values between the Muscle Energy Technique and Myofascial Release \nKeywords: janda’s muscle energy technique; myofascial release; hamstrings; adolescent girls; nonspecific low back pain","PeriodicalId":14075,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Science And Diagnosis Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Science And Diagnosis Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmsdr.v6i9.949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nonspecific Low Back Pain among the adolescent  girls is due to underlying predisposing factors like postural errors, lack of physical exercise in which Hamstrings tightness is a key contributing factor. Methodology: The research was experimental in nature. The subjects was selected through purposive sampling. 60 female collegiate girls was selected and divided into 3 groups. Group A include 20 subjects was given conventional treatment as Hot Pack on Hamstrings Muscle over the posterior aspect of thigh of both the lower limbs for 10 minutes. Then Lumbar Mobility Exercises was performed by subject. Group B include 20 subjects was given conventional treatment as Hot Pack on Hamstrings Muscle over the posterior aspect of thigh of both the lower limbs for 10 minutes. Then Lumbar Mobility Exercises was performed by subject. Group C  include 20 subjects was given  conventional treatment as Hot Pack on Hamstrings Muscle over the posterior aspect of thigh of both the lower limbs for 10 minutes. Then Lumbar Mobility Exercises was performed by subject. Pretest and Post test data for both the groups will be evaluated for Back Pain using Visual Analogue Scale and Back Dysfunction using Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire respectively. Result: The data was analysed by using paired and unpaired t-test. There were Significant differences in pre and post scores of Group B (MET) and Group C (MFR) when paired t-test was applied. When these groups were compared using unpaired t-test, all showed significant differences. Group B (MET) demonstrated more improvement than Group C (MFR) and Group A (control). However, Group C (MFR) showed significant improvement than Group A (control). Conclusion: The study concluded that Muscle Energy Technique is better than Myofascial Release Technique in improving Back Range of Motion and Dysfunction among Adolescent Girls with Nonspecific Low Back Pain. There was a significant variation of values between the Muscle Energy Technique and Myofascial Release Keywords: janda’s muscle energy technique; myofascial release; hamstrings; adolescent girls; nonspecific low back pain
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简达肌能量法与腘绳肌筋膜松解对青春期少女非特异性腰痛背部活动范围和功能障碍的影响比较
背景:青春期女孩的非特异性腰痛是由于潜在的易感因素,如姿势错误,缺乏体育锻炼,其中腘绳肌紧绷是一个关键因素。方法:本研究为实验性研究。采用有目的抽样的方法选择研究对象。选取60名女大学生,分为3组。A组20例患者给予双下肢大腿后侧腘绳肌热敷常规治疗10分钟。然后进行腰椎活动训练。B组20例,给予双下肢大腿后侧腘绳肌热敷常规治疗10分钟。然后进行腰椎活动训练。C组20例患者给予双下肢大腿后侧腘绳肌热敷常规治疗10分钟。然后进行腰椎活动训练。两组的测试前和测试后数据将分别使用视觉模拟量表和Oswestry腰痛残疾问卷评估背部疼痛和背部功能障碍。结果:采用配对和非配对t检验对数据进行分析。采用配对t检验,B组(MET)和C组(MFR)的前后评分差异有统计学意义。当这些组使用非配对t检验进行比较时,均显示出显著差异。B组(MET组)比C组(MFR组)和A组(对照组)改善更多。而C组(MFR)较A组(对照组)有明显改善。结论:肌能技术在改善青春期少女非特异性腰痛的背部活动度和功能障碍方面优于肌筋膜释放技术。肌能法与肌筋膜释放法的数值差异有统计学意义肌筋膜释放;腿筋;少女;非特异性腰痛
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Curtain of Blood: Understanding Humanitarian and Healthcare Crisis in Manipur Spontaneous Hemopericardium Post-Thrombolysis in Stroke Metformin Therapy Assisted by Nanotechnology as a Possible Combinational Treatment for Diabetes Mellitus an Experimental Study Mesenchymal Stem Cells Ameliorate Lipid Metabolism while Reducing Blood Glucose in Streptozotocin (STZ)-Induced Diabetes Mellitus and High Fat Diet Induced Obesity Exploring Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Paragangliomas: Insights from a Tertiary Care Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1