Ueliton da Costa Leonidio, D. D. O. Cardoso, C. G. De Souza
{"title":"Universities Patent Quality Indicators (UPQI): A Bibliometric and Systematic Review","authors":"Ueliton da Costa Leonidio, D. D. O. Cardoso, C. G. De Souza","doi":"10.5530/jscires.12.2.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"University patent filings have increased worldwide over the years. However, in addition to quantity, it is important to evaluate the quality of these patents. Some studies have addressed this issue, but most of them are limited to analyzing a single or few quality indicators applied in specific areas. The literature on the subject is fragmented, so it is important to summarize this content and generate a systematized knowledge. In order to reduce this gap in the literature, this article focuses on University Patent Quality Indicators (UPQI) aiming to identify the metrics that have been used to evaluate the quality of these documents. Based on a bibliometric and systematic review, the study presents bibliometric indicators, scientific collaboration networks, keyword co-occurrence, and bibliographic coupling, as well as quality indicators found in the literature. The survey of publications was conducted on the Web of Science database. Out of a total of 760 articles, 68 were selected to present research in the field of UPQI. The results show an organized set of metrics and other information that can be used by managers, researchers and funding agencies to guide policies and decision-making that contribute to promoting technological development and partnerships with the productive sector.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.2.027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
University patent filings have increased worldwide over the years. However, in addition to quantity, it is important to evaluate the quality of these patents. Some studies have addressed this issue, but most of them are limited to analyzing a single or few quality indicators applied in specific areas. The literature on the subject is fragmented, so it is important to summarize this content and generate a systematized knowledge. In order to reduce this gap in the literature, this article focuses on University Patent Quality Indicators (UPQI) aiming to identify the metrics that have been used to evaluate the quality of these documents. Based on a bibliometric and systematic review, the study presents bibliometric indicators, scientific collaboration networks, keyword co-occurrence, and bibliographic coupling, as well as quality indicators found in the literature. The survey of publications was conducted on the Web of Science database. Out of a total of 760 articles, 68 were selected to present research in the field of UPQI. The results show an organized set of metrics and other information that can be used by managers, researchers and funding agencies to guide policies and decision-making that contribute to promoting technological development and partnerships with the productive sector.
近年来,世界范围内的大学专利申请量不断增加。然而,除了数量之外,评估这些专利的质量也很重要。一些研究已经解决了这个问题,但大多数研究仅限于分析应用于特定领域的单个或几个质量指标。关于该主题的文献是碎片化的,因此总结这些内容并产生系统化的知识是很重要的。为了缩小文献中的这一差距,本文将重点放在大学专利质量指标(UPQI)上,旨在确定用于评估这些文件质量的指标。在文献计量学和系统综述的基础上,研究提出了文献计量学指标、科学合作网络、关键词共现、书目耦合以及文献质量指标。对出版物的调查是在Web of Science数据库上进行的。在总共760篇文章中,有68篇被选中来介绍UPQI领域的研究。结果显示了一套有组织的指标和其他信息,管理人员、研究人员和资助机构可以使用这些指标和信息来指导有助于促进技术发展和与生产部门建立伙伴关系的政策和决策。