Thoughts on Trocar Site Hernia Prevention. A Narrative Review.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery Pub Date : 2022-12-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3389/jaws.2022.11034
A C de Beaux, B East
{"title":"Thoughts on Trocar Site Hernia Prevention. A Narrative Review.","authors":"A C de Beaux, B East","doi":"10.3389/jaws.2022.11034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery is now common place, and each trocar site is a potential incisional hernia site. A number of factors increase the risk of trocar site hernia (TSH) at any given trocar site. The aim of this paper is to explore the literature and identify the patients and the trocar sites at risk, which may allow target prevention strategies to minimise TSH. <b>Methods:</b> A pub med literature review was undertaken using the MeSH terms of \"trocar\" OR \"port-site\" AND \"hernia.\" No qualifying criteria were applied to this initial search. All abstracts were reviewed by the two authors to identify papers for full text review to inform this narrative review. <b>Results:</b> 961 abstracts were identified by the search. A reasonable quality systematic review was published in 2012, and 44 additional more recent publications were identified as informative. A number of patient factors, pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative factors were identified as possibly or likely increasing the risk of TSH. Their careful management alone and more likely in combination may help reduce the incidence of TSH. <b>Conclusion:</b> Clinically symptomatic TSH is uncommon, in relation to the many trocars inserted every day for \"keyhole\" surgery, although it is a not uncommon hernia to repair in general surgical practice. There are patients inherently at risk of TSH, especially at the umbilical location. It is likely, that a multi-factored approach to surgery, will have a cumulative effect at reducing the overall risk of TSH at any trocar site, including choice of trocar type and size, method of insertion, events during the operation, and decisions around the need for fascial closure and how this is performed following trocar removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":34200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10831692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/jaws.2022.11034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery is now common place, and each trocar site is a potential incisional hernia site. A number of factors increase the risk of trocar site hernia (TSH) at any given trocar site. The aim of this paper is to explore the literature and identify the patients and the trocar sites at risk, which may allow target prevention strategies to minimise TSH. Methods: A pub med literature review was undertaken using the MeSH terms of "trocar" OR "port-site" AND "hernia." No qualifying criteria were applied to this initial search. All abstracts were reviewed by the two authors to identify papers for full text review to inform this narrative review. Results: 961 abstracts were identified by the search. A reasonable quality systematic review was published in 2012, and 44 additional more recent publications were identified as informative. A number of patient factors, pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative factors were identified as possibly or likely increasing the risk of TSH. Their careful management alone and more likely in combination may help reduce the incidence of TSH. Conclusion: Clinically symptomatic TSH is uncommon, in relation to the many trocars inserted every day for "keyhole" surgery, although it is a not uncommon hernia to repair in general surgical practice. There are patients inherently at risk of TSH, especially at the umbilical location. It is likely, that a multi-factored approach to surgery, will have a cumulative effect at reducing the overall risk of TSH at any trocar site, including choice of trocar type and size, method of insertion, events during the operation, and decisions around the need for fascial closure and how this is performed following trocar removal.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于套管部位疝气预防的思考。叙述性综述。
背景:腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助手术现在已很普遍,每个套管部位都是潜在的切口疝部位。许多因素会增加在任何特定套管部位发生套管部位疝(TSH)的风险。本文旨在探讨文献,确定有风险的患者和套管部位,从而制定有针对性的预防策略,最大限度地降低 TSH。方法:使用 MeSH 术语 "套管 "或 "孔部位 "和 "疝气 "进行公共医学文献综述。初次检索未采用限定标准。两位作者对所有摘要进行了审阅,以确定需要进行全文审阅的论文,为本叙事性综述提供信息。结果:搜索共发现 961 篇摘要。2012年发表了一篇质量尚可的系统综述,另外还发现了44篇近期发表的具有参考价值的文章。一些患者因素、术前、术中和术后因素被认为可能或有可能增加 TSH 的风险。对这些因素进行单独或更有可能是联合的谨慎管理有助于降低 TSH 的发生率。结论:临床上有症状的 TSH 并不常见,因为每天都要插入很多套管进行 "锁孔 "手术,尽管在普通外科实践中,这种疝气的修补并不少见。有些患者本身就有 TSH 风险,尤其是在脐部位置。多因素的手术方法很可能会产生累积效应,降低任何套管部位 TSH 的总体风险,包括套管类型和大小的选择、插入方法、手术过程中的事件、是否需要筋膜闭合的决定以及移除套管后如何进行筋膜闭合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Flu-like symptoms following botulinum toxin A application before incisional hernia repair: A case report A rare case report of inverse sciatic hernia unveiling as a lipoma Closed-loop obstruction due to internal hernia: An atypical clinical presentation of acute abdomen - A case report Laparoscopic management of delayed traumatic left diaphragmatic hernia with intrathoracic kidney: A rare case report and technical aspects Unique laparoscopic emergency management of traumatic obstructed abdominal wall hernia: A case report and review of literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1