Later Stone and Iron Age Cohabitation at the Nsongezi Open-Air Site, Western Uganda

IF 0.2 Q4 AREA STUDIES Africa Review Pub Date : 2022-01-18 DOI:10.1163/09744061-20220001
E. Kyazike
{"title":"Later Stone and Iron Age Cohabitation at the Nsongezi Open-Air Site, Western Uganda","authors":"E. Kyazike","doi":"10.1163/09744061-20220001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This research at the Nsongezi open-air site examines the intergenerational artefacts at a site where the first Stone Age artefacts were identified in Uganda. The purpose was to examine the nature and cause of the mixed Later Stone Age (LSA) and Iron Age (IA) artefacts in the same stratigraphic context at Nsongezi. The specific objectives included examining the ceramic assemblage, discussing the nature of interactions between the Later Stone Age and Iron Age people and accounting for why and how the mixture of artefacts occurs at Nsongezi. Using a documentary review, archaeological survey, and excavation, the research re-examines the theories of displacement and coexistence concerning the LSA and IA material mixture, which has always been dismissed as a disturbance of stratigraphic contexts. Guided by the Law of superimposition, the association of archaeological material from different cultural periods such as the Later Stone Age and Iron Age artefacts at Nsongezi is attributed to four phenomena. First is the cultural interaction of distinct LSA and IA populations. Secondly, the LSA populations may have adopted Iron Age technology and pottery while continuing with some of the LSA technology and pottery. Thirdly, the Iron Age populations occupied the LSA sites previously abandoned, and some of the LSA peoples occupied the old Iron Age sites as the two groups crisscrossed the region in shifting agricultural and hunter-gatherer economies. Finally, the mixed LSA and Iron Age deposits might have resulted from post-abandonment taphonomic processes. Therefore, the social interactions between the LSA and IA at Nsongezi challenge the dominant narrative that the IA populations used their metal technology’s superiority to displace and absorb the LSA people.","PeriodicalId":41966,"journal":{"name":"Africa Review","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/09744061-20220001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research at the Nsongezi open-air site examines the intergenerational artefacts at a site where the first Stone Age artefacts were identified in Uganda. The purpose was to examine the nature and cause of the mixed Later Stone Age (LSA) and Iron Age (IA) artefacts in the same stratigraphic context at Nsongezi. The specific objectives included examining the ceramic assemblage, discussing the nature of interactions between the Later Stone Age and Iron Age people and accounting for why and how the mixture of artefacts occurs at Nsongezi. Using a documentary review, archaeological survey, and excavation, the research re-examines the theories of displacement and coexistence concerning the LSA and IA material mixture, which has always been dismissed as a disturbance of stratigraphic contexts. Guided by the Law of superimposition, the association of archaeological material from different cultural periods such as the Later Stone Age and Iron Age artefacts at Nsongezi is attributed to four phenomena. First is the cultural interaction of distinct LSA and IA populations. Secondly, the LSA populations may have adopted Iron Age technology and pottery while continuing with some of the LSA technology and pottery. Thirdly, the Iron Age populations occupied the LSA sites previously abandoned, and some of the LSA peoples occupied the old Iron Age sites as the two groups crisscrossed the region in shifting agricultural and hunter-gatherer economies. Finally, the mixed LSA and Iron Age deposits might have resulted from post-abandonment taphonomic processes. Therefore, the social interactions between the LSA and IA at Nsongezi challenge the dominant narrative that the IA populations used their metal technology’s superiority to displace and absorb the LSA people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌干达西部Nsongezi露天遗址的石器和铁器时代晚期共存
在Nsongezi露天遗址进行的这项研究检查了在乌干达发现第一批石器时代人工制品的遗址的代际人工制品。目的是研究在Nsongezi同一地层背景下的晚期石器时代(LSA)和铁器时代(IA)混合人工制品的性质和原因。具体目标包括检查陶瓷组合,讨论石器时代晚期和铁器时代人类之间相互作用的本质,以及解释为什么以及如何在Nsongezi出现人工制品的混合物。通过文献回顾、考古调查和挖掘,本研究重新审视了一直被认为是地层环境扰动的LSA和IA物质混合物的位移和共存理论。在叠加定律的指导下,来自不同文化时期的考古材料,如Nsongezi的晚期石器时代和铁器时代的文物,可以归结为四种现象。首先是不同LSA和IA种群之间的文化相互作用。其次,LSA人群可能采用了铁器时代的技术和陶器,同时继续使用一些LSA技术和陶器。第三,铁器时代的人口占据了先前被遗弃的LSA遗址,一些LSA人占据了旧铁器时代的遗址,因为这两个群体在农业和狩猎-采集经济的转变中纵横交错。最后,LSA和铁器时代的混合沉积可能是废弃后的地学作用的结果。因此,在Nsongezi, LSA和IA之间的社会互动挑战了IA群体利用其金属技术优势取代和吸收LSA人群的主流叙事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Africa Review
Africa Review AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Africa Review is an interdisciplinary academic journal of the African Studies Association of India (ASA India) and focuses on theoretical, historical, literary and developmental enquiries related to African affairs. The central aim of the journal is to promote a scholarly understanding of developments and change in Africa, publishing both original scholarship on developments in individual countries as well as comparative analyses examining the wider region. The journal serves the full spectrum of social science disciplinary communities, including anthropology, archaeology, history, law, sociology, demography, development studies, economics, education, gender studies, industrial relations, literature, politics and urban studies.
期刊最新文献
Contemporary Issues on Governance, Conflict and Security in Africa , by Adeoye O. Akinola (ed.) African Navies: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives , by Timothy Stapleton (ed.) Violence, Patronage Politics and Farm Ownership in Zimbabwean Land Reform Nigerian Maritime IKS and Gendered Ecologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1