Living in a Modern City: Digital Practices of Homeless People in St Petersburg

A. Chernoivanova
{"title":"Living in a Modern City: Digital Practices of Homeless People in St Petersburg","authors":"A. Chernoivanova","doi":"10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-3-70-81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article describes the impact of the global trend of digitalization on the most vulnerable category of the population. The study of the digital divide is a fairly new area of research in the social sciences. Modern technologies are a part of our lives that influence social processes – in particular, it can increase or reduce social inequality. Modern researchers are finding more and more evidence of the growth of relative inequalities in Internet skills and Internet use. In case if the typical user’s “set” is a smartphone, the Internet and a laptop (or computer), the homeless person’s “set of technologies” may be different or not at all. Studies of the digital divide have already been conducted in large cities of socially and economically developed countries.Methodology and sources. The object of the study is a group with a low socio-economic status, homeless people, including those who have returned from prison. The study involved 15 respondents from 24 living in the social center at the time of the interview.Results and discussion. As a result of the analysis of the collected data, some features of the perception of digital technologies and practices of their use were identified. The peculiarities of perception are combined into a group of discursive patterns, the practice of using digital technologies – into a group of behavioral patterns. A good result of sociological research is the refutation of stereotypes that have developed in society. So, it seems possible to identify two main stereotypes. It is believed that mostly the homeless do not have cell phones, but if they do, it is likely a status thing for them. The second stereotype is associated with the repertoire of digital technologies: homeless people likely use non-personalized technologies due to their marginal position. Both stereotypes have been refuted. The unexpected result of the study indicates its absolute relevance and the prospect of further study, including vulnerable groups of the population.Conclusion. The prospect of future research is the continuation of the study on the example of other organizations and the study of other categories of homeless people (applying for overnight accommodation for one night or not visiting social organizations). It also should be noted, that the possibility of developing new social work practices taking into account the results of the study.","PeriodicalId":75784,"journal":{"name":"Dental Discourse","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-3-70-81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The article describes the impact of the global trend of digitalization on the most vulnerable category of the population. The study of the digital divide is a fairly new area of research in the social sciences. Modern technologies are a part of our lives that influence social processes – in particular, it can increase or reduce social inequality. Modern researchers are finding more and more evidence of the growth of relative inequalities in Internet skills and Internet use. In case if the typical user’s “set” is a smartphone, the Internet and a laptop (or computer), the homeless person’s “set of technologies” may be different or not at all. Studies of the digital divide have already been conducted in large cities of socially and economically developed countries.Methodology and sources. The object of the study is a group with a low socio-economic status, homeless people, including those who have returned from prison. The study involved 15 respondents from 24 living in the social center at the time of the interview.Results and discussion. As a result of the analysis of the collected data, some features of the perception of digital technologies and practices of their use were identified. The peculiarities of perception are combined into a group of discursive patterns, the practice of using digital technologies – into a group of behavioral patterns. A good result of sociological research is the refutation of stereotypes that have developed in society. So, it seems possible to identify two main stereotypes. It is believed that mostly the homeless do not have cell phones, but if they do, it is likely a status thing for them. The second stereotype is associated with the repertoire of digital technologies: homeless people likely use non-personalized technologies due to their marginal position. Both stereotypes have been refuted. The unexpected result of the study indicates its absolute relevance and the prospect of further study, including vulnerable groups of the population.Conclusion. The prospect of future research is the continuation of the study on the example of other organizations and the study of other categories of homeless people (applying for overnight accommodation for one night or not visiting social organizations). It also should be noted, that the possibility of developing new social work practices taking into account the results of the study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生活在现代城市:圣彼得堡无家可归者的数字实践
介绍。这篇文章描述了全球数字化趋势对人口中最弱势群体的影响。对数字鸿沟的研究是社会科学中一个相当新的研究领域。现代技术是我们生活的一部分,影响着社会进程——特别是,它可以增加或减少社会不平等。现代研究人员发现越来越多的证据表明,互联网技能和互联网使用方面的相对不平等正在加剧。如果典型用户的“设备”是智能手机、互联网和笔记本电脑(或电脑),那么无家可归者的“设备”可能会有所不同,或者根本就没有。关于数字鸿沟的研究已经在社会和经济发达国家的大城市进行。方法和来源。本研究的对象是社会经济地位较低、无家可归的人群,包括那些从监狱回来的人。这项研究涉及24名在采访时住在社交中心的15名受访者。结果和讨论。通过对收集到的数据进行分析,确定了对数字技术的看法及其使用实践的一些特征。感知的特殊性被组合成一组话语模式,使用数字技术的实践被组合成一组行为模式。社会学研究的一个好结果是对社会中形成的刻板印象的驳斥。因此,似乎有可能确定两种主要的刻板印象。据信,大多数无家可归者没有手机,但如果他们有,这可能是他们的身份。第二种刻板印象与数字技术有关:无家可归的人可能会使用非个性化的技术,因为他们处于边缘地位。这两种刻板印象都被驳斥了。该研究的意外结果表明其绝对相关性和进一步研究的前景,包括弱势群体。未来研究的前景是继续研究其他组织的例子和研究其他类别的无家可归者(申请过夜住宿一晚或不访问社会组织)。还应指出的是,考虑到研究结果,发展新的社会工作实践的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Human Sciences: Another Experience of Substantiating Socio-Humanitarian Knowledge Logical and Historical Aspects of the Genesis of Russian Sociology (on the Example of N.Ya. Danilevsky and N.K. Mikhailovsky) Social Relations of IT Professionals with Other Professional Groups: Network Modeling and Results of Empirical Analysis The Talk about the History of the Treuhandanstalt. Interview with Markus Böick. Part 1 Søren Kierkegaard’s “Man in Search of God” as a Cultural and Anthropological Type
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1