Accessibility and Disability Services for Libraries: A Survey of Large, Research-Intensive Institutions

IF 0.8 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Portal-Libraries and the Academy Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1353/pla.2022.0044
M. M. Longmeier, Anita K. Foster
{"title":"Accessibility and Disability Services for Libraries: A Survey of Large, Research-Intensive Institutions","authors":"M. M. Longmeier, Anita K. Foster","doi":"10.1353/pla.2022.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:As academic libraries prioritize accessibility for all individuals, they have carried out transformations of their physical and virtual spaces. For example, they have purchased new hardware, software, and furniture; adjusted websites for screen readers; modified handouts used in instruction; and advocated for change with vendors of leased and purchased content. Whether driven by campus mandates, state regulations, lawsuits, or more proactive motives, libraries have reviewed and improved the delivery of their content to better serve the needs of all users. Several surveys cover the disability and accessibility services available at libraries and how they have changed over time, but few studies examine who within the library provides support to users and how changes in campus and state requirements impact the delivery of these services. This article summarizes the results of a survey of Association of Research Libraries (ARL) institutions in October 2020 related to what services the library provides, whether they have changed due to campus or state requirements, which positions within libraries provide support, and what the impetus was for offering services. The authors also discuss implications for scalable support of disability and accessibility services at university libraries.","PeriodicalId":51670,"journal":{"name":"Portal-Libraries and the Academy","volume":"110 1","pages":"823 - 853"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Portal-Libraries and the Academy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2022.0044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:As academic libraries prioritize accessibility for all individuals, they have carried out transformations of their physical and virtual spaces. For example, they have purchased new hardware, software, and furniture; adjusted websites for screen readers; modified handouts used in instruction; and advocated for change with vendors of leased and purchased content. Whether driven by campus mandates, state regulations, lawsuits, or more proactive motives, libraries have reviewed and improved the delivery of their content to better serve the needs of all users. Several surveys cover the disability and accessibility services available at libraries and how they have changed over time, but few studies examine who within the library provides support to users and how changes in campus and state requirements impact the delivery of these services. This article summarizes the results of a survey of Association of Research Libraries (ARL) institutions in October 2020 related to what services the library provides, whether they have changed due to campus or state requirements, which positions within libraries provide support, and what the impetus was for offering services. The authors also discuss implications for scalable support of disability and accessibility services at university libraries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图书馆无障碍与残疾服务:大型研究密集型机构调查
摘要:高校图书馆优先考虑所有个体的可访问性,对其物理空间和虚拟空间进行了改造。例如,他们购买了新的硬件、软件和家具;调整网站屏幕阅读器;教学中使用的经修改的讲义;并主张改变租赁和购买内容的供应商。无论是受到校园命令、州法规、诉讼还是更积极的动机的驱动,图书馆都审查并改进了其内容的交付,以更好地满足所有用户的需求。一些调查涵盖了图书馆提供的残疾人和无障碍服务,以及它们如何随着时间的推移而变化,但很少有研究调查图书馆内谁为用户提供支持,以及校园和州要求的变化如何影响这些服务的提供。本文总结了2020年10月对研究型图书馆协会(ARL)机构进行的一项调查结果,该调查涉及图书馆提供的服务,是否因校园或州的要求而改变,图书馆内的哪些职位提供支持,以及提供服务的动力是什么。作者还讨论了大学图书馆对残疾人和无障碍服务的可扩展支持的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Portal-Libraries and the Academy
Portal-Libraries and the Academy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Student Preferences for Reference Services at a Remote Biological Station Library Addressing Classification System Bias in Higher Education Libraries in England A Case for Open Peer Review Podcasting in Academic Librarianship Requesting Librarian-Led Information Literacy Support: Instructor Approaches, Experiences, and Attitudes Meaningful Work when Work Won’t Love You Back: Sociological Imagination and Reflective Teaching Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1