Beyond Relational Contracts: Social Capital and Network Governance in Procurement Contracts

IF 3 1区 社会学 Q1 LAW Journal of Legal Analysis Pub Date : 2015-12-01 DOI:10.1093/JLA/LAW001
Lisa E. Bernstein
{"title":"Beyond Relational Contracts: Social Capital and Network Governance in Procurement Contracts","authors":"Lisa E. Bernstein","doi":"10.1093/JLA/LAW001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The master agreements that nominally govern the transactions between mid-western Original Equipment Manufacturers and their suppliers are not, for the most part, designed to create legal obligations. Rather, they create a space in which private order can flourish, much like the role played by firm boundaries in the Coase-Williamson theory of the firm. This Article explores how sophisticated transactors in this market have combined governance techniques associated with arm’s-length contracting, intrafirm hierarchy, and trust-based relational contracting to create relationships that are long-term, highly cooperative, and characterized by significant relationship-specific investment. It suggests that these transactors have been able to accomplish these outcomes with only minimal reliance on the legal system, in large part because they operate in a market of highly interconnected firms — a network that itself functions as a contract governance mechanism. It then explores the implications of these contract structures and the availability of network governance for firms’ make-or-buy decisions and the likelihood of innovation.","PeriodicalId":45189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Analysis","volume":"25 1","pages":"561-621"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"67","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JLA/LAW001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

Abstract

The master agreements that nominally govern the transactions between mid-western Original Equipment Manufacturers and their suppliers are not, for the most part, designed to create legal obligations. Rather, they create a space in which private order can flourish, much like the role played by firm boundaries in the Coase-Williamson theory of the firm. This Article explores how sophisticated transactors in this market have combined governance techniques associated with arm’s-length contracting, intrafirm hierarchy, and trust-based relational contracting to create relationships that are long-term, highly cooperative, and characterized by significant relationship-specific investment. It suggests that these transactors have been able to accomplish these outcomes with only minimal reliance on the legal system, in large part because they operate in a market of highly interconnected firms — a network that itself functions as a contract governance mechanism. It then explores the implications of these contract structures and the availability of network governance for firms’ make-or-buy decisions and the likelihood of innovation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越关系契约:采购契约中的社会资本与网络治理
名义上管理中西部原始设备制造商与其供应商之间交易的主协议,在很大程度上并不是为了创造法律义务而设计的。相反,它们创造了一个私人秩序可以蓬勃发展的空间,就像科斯-威廉姆森企业理论中企业边界所扮演的角色一样。本文探讨了这个市场中成熟的交易者如何结合与公平契约、公司内部层次结构和基于信任的关系契约相关的治理技术,以创建长期、高度合作的关系,并以重要的关系特定投资为特征。它表明,这些交易者能够在对法律体系的依赖最小的情况下实现这些结果,这在很大程度上是因为他们在一个由高度相互关联的企业组成的市场中运作——这个网络本身就起到了合同治理机制的作用。然后探讨了这些契约结构的含义,以及网络治理对公司“自行决定还是购买”决策的可用性和创新的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Strategic Incentives for Adopting the Global Minimum Tax The Limits of Formalism in the Separation of Powers Putting Freedom of Contract in its Place Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models How Election Rules Affect Who Wins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1