Moderate and Non-Arbitrary Sentencing Without Guidelines – The German Experience

Q2 Social Sciences Law and Contemporary Problems Pub Date : 2011-12-18 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2041979
Tatjana Hörnle
{"title":"Moderate and Non-Arbitrary Sentencing Without Guidelines – The German Experience","authors":"Tatjana Hörnle","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2041979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is often assumed that sentencing guidelines are important to ensure fair and equal sentencing in criminal cases. Against this background, it needs explanations why criminal justice systems such as the German criminal justice system can achieve fairly moderate and equal outcomes without guidelines. The article examines factors within the legal system (such as the education and self-understanding of judges, legal education) which might contribute to a fairly moderate and equal sentencing system in the absences of sentencing guidelines.","PeriodicalId":39484,"journal":{"name":"Law and Contemporary Problems","volume":"33 1","pages":"189-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Contemporary Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2041979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

It is often assumed that sentencing guidelines are important to ensure fair and equal sentencing in criminal cases. Against this background, it needs explanations why criminal justice systems such as the German criminal justice system can achieve fairly moderate and equal outcomes without guidelines. The article examines factors within the legal system (such as the education and self-understanding of judges, legal education) which might contribute to a fairly moderate and equal sentencing system in the absences of sentencing guidelines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
没有指导原则的适度和非任意量刑——德国的经验
人们通常认为,量刑准则对于确保刑事案件的公正和平等量刑很重要。在这种背景下,我们需要解释为什么像德国这样的刑事司法系统在没有指导方针的情况下可以取得相当温和和平等的结果。本文探讨了法律制度内的因素(如法官的教育和自我认识、法律教育),这些因素可能有助于在没有量刑准则的情况下建立一个相当温和和平等的量刑制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Law and Contemporary Problems
Law and Contemporary Problems Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Law and Contemporary Problems was founded in 1933 and is the oldest journal published at Duke Law School. It is a quarterly, interdisciplinary, faculty-edited publication of Duke Law School. L&CP recognizes that many fields in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities can enhance the development and understanding of law. It is our purpose to seek out these areas of overlap and to publish balanced symposia that enlighten not just legal readers, but readers from these other disciplines as well. L&CP uses a symposium format, generally publishing one symposium per issue on a topic of contemporary concern. Authors and articles are selected to ensure that each issue collectively creates a unified presentation of the contemporary problem under consideration. L&CP hosts an annual conference at Duke Law School featuring the authors of one of the year’s four symposia.
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Re-Selection on Independent Decision Making in State Supreme Courts Voting Rights and the “Statutory Constitution” Challenging Gender in Single-Sex Spaces: Lessons from a Feminist Softball League Treaties and Human Rights: The Role of Long-Term Trends Correcting Federalism Mistakes in Statutory Interpretation: The Supreme Court and the Federal Arbitration Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1