Understanding strategy development in mathematics: using eye movement measurement in educational research

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Research in Education Sciences Pub Date : 2014-07-01 DOI:10.15527/EJRE.201426252
Y. Kuroda, N. Okamoto
{"title":"Understanding strategy development in mathematics: using eye movement measurement in educational research","authors":"Y. Kuroda, N. Okamoto","doi":"10.15527/EJRE.201426252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Devices that measure eye movement have made it possible for researchers to obtain and analyze learners’ eye movements when they engage in problem solving. This study investigated if eye movement characteristics differed according to whether strategies were developed during a division puzzle task, and before and after such strategy development. This task entailed inserting numbers in blank boxes while performing a division. Participants needed to think about the structure of the calculation and develop appropriate strategies. Twelve university students were recruited as participants. Our results showed little eye movement when strategies had been developed, and for answers to be completed efficiently. However, when strategies had not been developed, the participants exhibited a tendency toward much eye movement. Further, after developing a strategy, eyes tended to stop moving. We found that eye movement data could reflect the characteristics of the learning processes. Thus, eye movement measurement data could be helpful for understanding the learning processes in younger students as well (such as elementary school students), who often have difficulty explaining their understanding and strategy development conditions. In addition, eye movement measurement could be used to examine the differences in the process of using different strategies for identical problems. © 2013 European Journal of Research on Education by IASSR.","PeriodicalId":43604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Education Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"94-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Education Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15527/EJRE.201426252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Devices that measure eye movement have made it possible for researchers to obtain and analyze learners’ eye movements when they engage in problem solving. This study investigated if eye movement characteristics differed according to whether strategies were developed during a division puzzle task, and before and after such strategy development. This task entailed inserting numbers in blank boxes while performing a division. Participants needed to think about the structure of the calculation and develop appropriate strategies. Twelve university students were recruited as participants. Our results showed little eye movement when strategies had been developed, and for answers to be completed efficiently. However, when strategies had not been developed, the participants exhibited a tendency toward much eye movement. Further, after developing a strategy, eyes tended to stop moving. We found that eye movement data could reflect the characteristics of the learning processes. Thus, eye movement measurement data could be helpful for understanding the learning processes in younger students as well (such as elementary school students), who often have difficulty explaining their understanding and strategy development conditions. In addition, eye movement measurement could be used to examine the differences in the process of using different strategies for identical problems. © 2013 European Journal of Research on Education by IASSR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解数学中的策略发展:眼动测量在教育研究中的应用
测量眼球运动的设备使研究人员有可能获得和分析学习者在解决问题时的眼球运动。本研究考察了在除法谜题任务中是否开发策略以及策略开发前后眼动特征的差异。这项任务需要在执行除法时在空白框中插入数字。与会者需要考虑计算的结构并制定适当的策略。12名大学生被招募为参与者。我们的研究结果表明,当制定策略时,为了有效地完成答案,眼球运动很少。然而,当没有制定策略时,参与者表现出大量眼球运动的倾向。此外,在制定策略后,眼睛往往停止移动。我们发现眼动数据可以反映学习过程的特征。因此,眼动测量数据可能有助于理解低年级学生(如小学生)的学习过程,这些学生通常难以解释他们的理解和策略发展情况。此外,眼动测量可以用来检验在使用不同策略解决相同问题的过程中的差异。©2013《欧洲教育研究杂志》,IASSR出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Education Sciences
Journal of Research in Education Sciences EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
66.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Education Sciences is published by National Taiwan Normal University. The mission of this Journal is to publish original research papers in the domain of education (principles of instruction, learning, and assessment; educational administration and strategy; learning courses ; science and technology education). All papers that present educational concepts and results of research and development obtained through empirical research methods, such as methods of quantitative research, qualitative research, or a combination of both, are solicited by this journal.
期刊最新文献
Between “push” and “pull”?─ an analysis of taiwan’s “brain drain” and possible solutions from the perspective of push-pull theory: The examples of ph.d. holders in the U.S 高中學生角色期望量表之編製 Development of Inventory for the Role Expectations of High-School Students Follow-up study on college learning performance and career development of science class graduates Relationship between self-efficacy of invention, epistemic curiosity, and students’ intentions to consistently participate in the IEYI Outcomes of the application of performance-based assessment system for educational practicums
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1