Phase Transition in the Social Impact Model of Opinion Formation in Scale-Free Networks: The Social Power Effect

A. Mansouri, F. Taghiyareh
{"title":"Phase Transition in the Social Impact Model of Opinion Formation in Scale-Free Networks: The Social Power Effect","authors":"A. Mansouri, F. Taghiyareh","doi":"10.18564/jasss.4232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human interactions and opinion exchanges lead to social opinion dynamics, which is well described by opinion formationmodels. In thesemodels, a random parameter is usually considered as the system noise, indicating the individual’s inexplicable opinion changes. This noise could be an indicator of any other influential factors, such as public media, a ects, and emotions. We study phase transitions, changes from one social phase to another, for various noise levels in a discrete opinion formation model based on the social impact theory with a scale-free random network as its interaction network topology. We also generate another similar model using the concept of social power based on the agents’ node degrees in the interaction network as an estimation for their persuasiveness and supportiveness strengths and compare both models from phase transition viewpoint. We show by agent-based simulation and analytical considerations how opinion phases, including majority and non-majority, are formed in terms of the initial population of agents in opinion groups andnoise levels. Two factors a ect the systemphase in equilibriumwhen thenoise level increases: breaking up more segregated groups and dominance of stochastic behavior of the agents on their deterministic behavior. In the high enough noise levels, the system reaches a non-majority phase in equilibrium, regardless of the initial combination of opinion groups. In relatively low noise levels, the original model and the model whose agents’ strengths are proportional to their centrality have di erent behaviors. The presence of a few high-connected influential leaders in the latter model consequences a di erent behavior in reaching equilibrium phase and di erent thresholds of noise levels for phase transitions.","PeriodicalId":14675,"journal":{"name":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","volume":"os-26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Human interactions and opinion exchanges lead to social opinion dynamics, which is well described by opinion formationmodels. In thesemodels, a random parameter is usually considered as the system noise, indicating the individual’s inexplicable opinion changes. This noise could be an indicator of any other influential factors, such as public media, a ects, and emotions. We study phase transitions, changes from one social phase to another, for various noise levels in a discrete opinion formation model based on the social impact theory with a scale-free random network as its interaction network topology. We also generate another similar model using the concept of social power based on the agents’ node degrees in the interaction network as an estimation for their persuasiveness and supportiveness strengths and compare both models from phase transition viewpoint. We show by agent-based simulation and analytical considerations how opinion phases, including majority and non-majority, are formed in terms of the initial population of agents in opinion groups andnoise levels. Two factors a ect the systemphase in equilibriumwhen thenoise level increases: breaking up more segregated groups and dominance of stochastic behavior of the agents on their deterministic behavior. In the high enough noise levels, the system reaches a non-majority phase in equilibrium, regardless of the initial combination of opinion groups. In relatively low noise levels, the original model and the model whose agents’ strengths are proportional to their centrality have di erent behaviors. The presence of a few high-connected influential leaders in the latter model consequences a di erent behavior in reaching equilibrium phase and di erent thresholds of noise levels for phase transitions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无标度网络中意见形成社会影响模型的相变:社会权力效应
人际互动和意见交换导致社会意见动态,这是由意见形成模型很好地描述。在这些模型中,一个随机参数通常被认为是系统噪声,表示个体无法解释的意见变化。这种噪音可能是任何其他影响因素的指标,如公共媒体、影响和情绪。本文以无标度随机网络为交互网络拓扑,研究基于社会影响理论的离散意见形成模型中不同噪声水平下的相位转变,即从一个社会阶段到另一个社会阶段的变化。我们还使用社会权力的概念生成了另一个类似的模型,该模型基于代理在交互网络中的节点度作为其说服力和支持性强度的估计,并从相变的角度对两种模型进行了比较。我们通过基于智能体的模拟和分析考虑,展示了意见阶段(包括多数和非多数)是如何根据意见组中的初始智能体数量和噪声水平形成的。当噪声水平增加时,影响系统相位平衡的两个因素是:分裂更多的分离群体和主体的随机行为对其确定性行为的优势。在足够高的噪声水平下,无论最初的意见组合如何,系统都会达到非多数阶段的平衡。在相对较低的噪声水平下,原始模型和智能体强度与其中心性成正比的模型表现出不同的行为。在后一种模型中,少数高联系的有影响力的领导者的存在导致了在达到平衡相位时的不同行为和相变噪声水平的不同阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conflicting Information and Compliance with COVID-19 Behavioral Recommendations Particle Swarm Optimization for Calibration in Spatially Explicit Agent-Based Modeling The Role of Reinforcement Learning in the Emergence of Conventions: Simulation Experiments with the Repeated Volunteer's Dilemma Generation of Synthetic Populations in Social Simulations: A Review of Methods and Practices An Integrated Ecological-Social Simulation Model of Farmer Decisions and Cropping System Performance in the Rolling Pampas (Argentina)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1