Performance Optimization of Chemical and Green Coagulants in Tannery Wastewater Treatment: A Response Surface Methodology Approach

IF 1 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Optimization Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI:10.1155/2023/9939499
Miriam Appiah-Brempong, Helen Michelle Korkor Essandoh, Nana Yaw Asiedu, Samuel Kwame Dadzie, Francis Warings Yao Momade
{"title":"Performance Optimization of Chemical and Green Coagulants in Tannery Wastewater Treatment: A Response Surface Methodology Approach","authors":"Miriam Appiah-Brempong, Helen Michelle Korkor Essandoh, Nana Yaw Asiedu, Samuel Kwame Dadzie, Francis Warings Yao Momade","doi":"10.1155/2023/9939499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vegetable tannery wastewater, highly laden with recalcitrant organics, is not easily treatable through biological processes. This study focuses on the use of response surface methodology in optimizing a coagulation-flocculation process for pretreatment of vegetable tannery wastewater. This study also assessed the possibility of replacing chemical coagulants such as aluminum sulphate with green alternatives such as cassava starch and orange peel powder. The effects of coagulant dosage and pH on three key wastewater quality parameters (chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total suspended solids (TSS)’s removal efficiencies as well as sludge volume index (SVI)) were also assessed. Quadratic models developed for all the three responses were adequate. The optimal conditions were attained at a pH of 3.17 and a dosage of 2.76 g/L for cassava starch coagulant, pH of 3.74 and a dosage of 5.16 g/L for orange peel powder coagulant, and pH of 6.09 and a dosage of 11.60 g/L for aluminum sulphate. The COD and TSS removal efficiencies as well as SVI achieved under these optimal conditions were 37.25%, 73.95%, and 14.80 mL/g, respectively, for cassava starch coagulant; 17.97%, 66.08%, and 19.87 mL/g, respectively, for orange peel powder coagulant; and 38.51%, 76.06%, and 29.57 mL/g, respectively, for aluminum sulphate. The outperformance of cassava starch over orange peel powder and its comparable results with aluminum sulphate makes the former a more environment-friendly alternative to aluminum sulphate for treatment of tannery wastewater.","PeriodicalId":42964,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optimization","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9939499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vegetable tannery wastewater, highly laden with recalcitrant organics, is not easily treatable through biological processes. This study focuses on the use of response surface methodology in optimizing a coagulation-flocculation process for pretreatment of vegetable tannery wastewater. This study also assessed the possibility of replacing chemical coagulants such as aluminum sulphate with green alternatives such as cassava starch and orange peel powder. The effects of coagulant dosage and pH on three key wastewater quality parameters (chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total suspended solids (TSS)’s removal efficiencies as well as sludge volume index (SVI)) were also assessed. Quadratic models developed for all the three responses were adequate. The optimal conditions were attained at a pH of 3.17 and a dosage of 2.76 g/L for cassava starch coagulant, pH of 3.74 and a dosage of 5.16 g/L for orange peel powder coagulant, and pH of 6.09 and a dosage of 11.60 g/L for aluminum sulphate. The COD and TSS removal efficiencies as well as SVI achieved under these optimal conditions were 37.25%, 73.95%, and 14.80 mL/g, respectively, for cassava starch coagulant; 17.97%, 66.08%, and 19.87 mL/g, respectively, for orange peel powder coagulant; and 38.51%, 76.06%, and 29.57 mL/g, respectively, for aluminum sulphate. The outperformance of cassava starch over orange peel powder and its comparable results with aluminum sulphate makes the former a more environment-friendly alternative to aluminum sulphate for treatment of tannery wastewater.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化学和绿色混凝剂在制革废水处理中的性能优化:响应面方法
植物制革厂废水中含有大量难降解有机物,不易通过生物工艺处理。本研究的重点是利用响应面法优化植物制革厂废水的混凝-絮凝预处理工艺。该研究还评估了用绿色替代品(如木薯淀粉和橙皮粉)替代化学混凝剂(如硫酸铝)的可能性。考察了混凝剂投加量和pH对三个关键水质参数(化学需氧量(COD)、总悬浮物(TSS)去除率以及污泥体积指数(SVI))的影响。对所有三种反应建立的二次模型都是足够的。木薯淀粉混凝剂pH为3.17,投加量为2.76 g/L;橙皮粉混凝剂pH为3.74,投加量为5.16 g/L;硫酸铝pH为6.09,投加量为11.60 g/L。在此条件下,木薯淀粉混凝剂的COD去除率为37.25%,TSS去除率为73.95%,SVI去除率为14.80 mL/g;橙皮粉混凝剂分别为17.97%、66.08%和19.87 mL/g;硫酸铝分别为38.51%、76.06%和29.57 mL/g。木薯淀粉的性能优于橙皮粉及其与硫酸铝的可比性,使前者成为处理制革厂废水的更环保的硫酸铝替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Optimization
Journal of Optimization ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Linear Programming Techniques as Applied to Diet Optimisation and Opportunities for Improvement Optimization of Deformation Behaviors during Continuous Forming Extrusion of C18150 Copper Alloy through Response Surface Methodology Performance Optimization of Chemical and Green Coagulants in Tannery Wastewater Treatment: A Response Surface Methodology Approach An Optimization Model for the Student-to-Project Supervisor Assignment Problem-The Case of an Engineering Department Optimal Control Analysis of Treatment Strategies of the Dynamics of Cholera
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1