{"title":"Understanding learning spillover","authors":"Svenja Richter, S. Kauffeld, Timo Kortsch","doi":"10.1108/DLO-12-2020-0253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe study explored whether and how satisfaction with and the perceived utility of the formal training positively influenced subsequent informal learning and the ways in which employee uncertainty avoidance impacted on these processes.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nEmployees of an automotive company in six countries were asked to complete two surveys following formal training, the first 7-12 days after the training and the second 5-7 weeks later.\n\n\nFindings\nResults showed a spillover effect when employees were satisfied with formal training and this was associated with enhanced informal learning. No effects from utility of training were found. Uncertainty avoidance was an important factor for both formal and informal learning.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nIt is not clear whether or not there may be differences between those employees who responded and those who did not. Future replication could address this issue.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis research should help the automotive industry cope with the challenges of the future through targeted personnel development.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nSo far as the authors are aware, this is the first longitudinal study to investigate the formal-informal learning interaction and to introduce reflection as a mediator. It also provides evidence that uncertainty avoidance is an important factor in formal and informal learning in a globalized context.\n","PeriodicalId":39753,"journal":{"name":"Development and Learning in Organizations","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Learning in Organizations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-12-2020-0253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
The study explored whether and how satisfaction with and the perceived utility of the formal training positively influenced subsequent informal learning and the ways in which employee uncertainty avoidance impacted on these processes.
Design/methodology/approach
Employees of an automotive company in six countries were asked to complete two surveys following formal training, the first 7-12 days after the training and the second 5-7 weeks later.
Findings
Results showed a spillover effect when employees were satisfied with formal training and this was associated with enhanced informal learning. No effects from utility of training were found. Uncertainty avoidance was an important factor for both formal and informal learning.
Research limitations/implications
It is not clear whether or not there may be differences between those employees who responded and those who did not. Future replication could address this issue.
Practical implications
This research should help the automotive industry cope with the challenges of the future through targeted personnel development.
Originality/value
So far as the authors are aware, this is the first longitudinal study to investigate the formal-informal learning interaction and to introduce reflection as a mediator. It also provides evidence that uncertainty avoidance is an important factor in formal and informal learning in a globalized context.
期刊介绍:
Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal is a unique management information resource for today"s busy managers who are seeking to develop their organization in the right direction. Case studies on leading companies and viewpoints from some of the best thinkers in the area of organizational development and learning combine to make this journal a very welcome addition to the management literature. In addition, as part of our special service, we scour through the mass of academic and non-academic literature to ensure that we keep up to date with the best and newest ideas. We then distil this information for our readers and present the most meaningful implications for managers in easy-to-digest reviews and commentaries.