Understanding learning spillover

Svenja Richter, S. Kauffeld, Timo Kortsch
{"title":"Understanding learning spillover","authors":"Svenja Richter, S. Kauffeld, Timo Kortsch","doi":"10.1108/DLO-12-2020-0253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe study explored whether and how satisfaction with and the perceived utility of the formal training positively influenced subsequent informal learning and the ways in which employee uncertainty avoidance impacted on these processes.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nEmployees of an automotive company in six countries were asked to complete two surveys following formal training, the first 7-12 days after the training and the second 5-7 weeks later.\n\n\nFindings\nResults showed a spillover effect when employees were satisfied with formal training and this was associated with enhanced informal learning. No effects from utility of training were found. Uncertainty avoidance was an important factor for both formal and informal learning.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nIt is not clear whether or not there may be differences between those employees who responded and those who did not. Future replication could address this issue.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis research should help the automotive industry cope with the challenges of the future through targeted personnel development.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nSo far as the authors are aware, this is the first longitudinal study to investigate the formal-informal learning interaction and to introduce reflection as a mediator. It also provides evidence that uncertainty avoidance is an important factor in formal and informal learning in a globalized context.\n","PeriodicalId":39753,"journal":{"name":"Development and Learning in Organizations","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Learning in Organizations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-12-2020-0253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The study explored whether and how satisfaction with and the perceived utility of the formal training positively influenced subsequent informal learning and the ways in which employee uncertainty avoidance impacted on these processes. Design/methodology/approach Employees of an automotive company in six countries were asked to complete two surveys following formal training, the first 7-12 days after the training and the second 5-7 weeks later. Findings Results showed a spillover effect when employees were satisfied with formal training and this was associated with enhanced informal learning. No effects from utility of training were found. Uncertainty avoidance was an important factor for both formal and informal learning. Research limitations/implications It is not clear whether or not there may be differences between those employees who responded and those who did not. Future replication could address this issue. Practical implications This research should help the automotive industry cope with the challenges of the future through targeted personnel development. Originality/value So far as the authors are aware, this is the first longitudinal study to investigate the formal-informal learning interaction and to introduce reflection as a mediator. It also provides evidence that uncertainty avoidance is an important factor in formal and informal learning in a globalized context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解学习溢出效应
目的探讨正式培训的满意度和感知效用是否以及如何积极影响随后的非正式学习,以及员工不确定性规避对这些过程的影响方式。设计/方法/方法一家汽车公司在六个国家的员工被要求在正式培训后完成两项调查,第一次是在培训后7-12天,第二次是在培训后5-7周。研究结果表明,当员工对正式培训感到满意时,会产生溢出效应,而这与非正式学习的增强有关。没有发现训练效用的影响。不确定性规避是正式学习和非正式学习的重要因素。研究的局限性/意义目前尚不清楚在那些有回应的员工和那些没有回应的员工之间是否存在差异。将来的复制可以解决这个问题。实际意义本研究应有助于汽车行业通过有针对性的人才发展来应对未来的挑战。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一个调查正式-非正式学习互动并引入反思作为中介的纵向研究。它还提供证据表明,不确定性规避是全球化背景下正式和非正式学习的一个重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Development and Learning in Organizations
Development and Learning in Organizations Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal is a unique management information resource for today"s busy managers who are seeking to develop their organization in the right direction. Case studies on leading companies and viewpoints from some of the best thinkers in the area of organizational development and learning combine to make this journal a very welcome addition to the management literature. In addition, as part of our special service, we scour through the mass of academic and non-academic literature to ensure that we keep up to date with the best and newest ideas. We then distil this information for our readers and present the most meaningful implications for managers in easy-to-digest reviews and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Learning in the UK fire service sector Effective response to major crises Are leaders born or made? Asking the right question. Out with the old Throwing a wrench in the system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1