A Qualitative Exploration of Teachers’ Perceptions about the Theory and Practice of English Language Curriculum at Higher Secondary Level

Amna Umar, Sumaira Noreen
{"title":"A Qualitative Exploration of Teachers’ Perceptions about the Theory and Practice of English Language Curriculum at Higher Secondary Level","authors":"Amna Umar, Sumaira Noreen","doi":"10.54692/ajss.2021.05021397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has long been debated that the English language programs (ELP) have not been able to achieve its objectives in Pakistani context. Students are still unable to learn and acquire English as a language. They memorize it as a subject. Researchers have blamed the policy, the practice, the curriculum and the overall implementation of the curriculum in this context. However, none have inquired about teachers’ perceptions about the theory and practice of ELP at higher secondary school (HSSC) level in the context of Pakistan’s public sector institutes which are affiliated with Board of Intermediate and secondary Education Lahore (BISEL). The aim of this research is to explore teachers’ perception about: (i) the theory (National Curriculum for English Language, 2006) and practice (textbooks, instructional methodologies, criteria of assessment) of English language program at higher secondary level, (ii) the discrepancies between the two, and, (iii) the reasons and solutions of identified discrepancies. To fulfill the aim, 20 English language teachers, teaching at higher secondary level are interviewed, using a semi-structured interview protocol. The findings of the research explicate that: ELP at HSSC level, in the context of BISEL public sector institutes, has not been able to achieve its objectives and there are enormous discrepancies between the theory and practice. The main reasons identified by the teachers are: poor background knowledge of students regarding EL, assessment based teaching and learning practices and the content based assessment. According to the teachers, for acquisition of EL in real terms, the entire system needs major modifications, not only at HSSC level, but also atgrass root level. They were of the view that students lack basic skills of EL, which ought to be acquired at primary and middle level. Higher secondary level is not to learn the basics of the language but to master the skills as a lifelong learning.","PeriodicalId":7068,"journal":{"name":"Academic Journal of Social Sciences (AJSS )","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Journal of Social Sciences (AJSS )","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54692/ajss.2021.05021397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has long been debated that the English language programs (ELP) have not been able to achieve its objectives in Pakistani context. Students are still unable to learn and acquire English as a language. They memorize it as a subject. Researchers have blamed the policy, the practice, the curriculum and the overall implementation of the curriculum in this context. However, none have inquired about teachers’ perceptions about the theory and practice of ELP at higher secondary school (HSSC) level in the context of Pakistan’s public sector institutes which are affiliated with Board of Intermediate and secondary Education Lahore (BISEL). The aim of this research is to explore teachers’ perception about: (i) the theory (National Curriculum for English Language, 2006) and practice (textbooks, instructional methodologies, criteria of assessment) of English language program at higher secondary level, (ii) the discrepancies between the two, and, (iii) the reasons and solutions of identified discrepancies. To fulfill the aim, 20 English language teachers, teaching at higher secondary level are interviewed, using a semi-structured interview protocol. The findings of the research explicate that: ELP at HSSC level, in the context of BISEL public sector institutes, has not been able to achieve its objectives and there are enormous discrepancies between the theory and practice. The main reasons identified by the teachers are: poor background knowledge of students regarding EL, assessment based teaching and learning practices and the content based assessment. According to the teachers, for acquisition of EL in real terms, the entire system needs major modifications, not only at HSSC level, but also atgrass root level. They were of the view that students lack basic skills of EL, which ought to be acquired at primary and middle level. Higher secondary level is not to learn the basics of the language but to master the skills as a lifelong learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师对高中英语课程理论与实践认知的质性探讨
长期以来,人们一直在争论英语语言课程(ELP)是否能够在巴基斯坦的背景下实现其目标。学生们仍然无法学习和掌握英语作为一门语言。他们把它作为一门学科来记忆。研究者在此背景下对政策、实践、课程以及课程的整体实施进行了指责。然而,在隶属于拉合尔中级和中等教育委员会(BISEL)的巴基斯坦公共部门机构的背景下,没有人询问教师对高等中学(HSSC)水平的ELP理论和实践的看法。本研究的目的是探讨教师对高中英语课程的看法:(i)理论(国家英语语言课程,2006年)和实践(教科书,教学方法,评估标准),(ii)两者之间的差异,(iii)发现差异的原因和解决方案。为了实现这一目标,使用半结构化访谈协议对20名高中英语教师进行了访谈。研究结果表明:在BISEL公共部门机构背景下,HSSC层面的ELP未能实现其目标,理论与实践之间存在巨大差异。教师认为主要原因是:学生对英语学习的背景知识贫乏、基于评估的教与学实践以及基于内容的评估。教师们认为,要真正实现英语的习得,整个系统都需要进行重大修改,不仅是在高深学科层面,而且在基层层面。他们认为学生缺乏英语的基本技能,这些技能应该在小学和中学阶段获得。高中阶段不是学习语言的基础知识,而是作为终身学习来掌握语言技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sino-US Contestation and Its Implications for South Asia Understanding the Impact of Service Convenience on Customer Satisfaction in Home Delivery: Evidence from Karachi Threats to Various Components of Human Security Cause Brain Drain in Pakistan Examining The Mediating Role of Workplace Incivility Between Emotional Intelligence and Organizational Commitment Water Scarcity in Gwadar: Challenges and Way Forward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1