A RADAR for information reconciliation in Question Answering systems over Linked Data

IF 2.9 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Semantic Web Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.3233/SW-160245
Elena Cabrio, S. Villata, Alessio Palmero Aprosio
{"title":"A RADAR for information reconciliation in Question Answering systems over Linked Data","authors":"Elena Cabrio, S. Villata, Alessio Palmero Aprosio","doi":"10.3233/SW-160245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the latest years, more and more structured data is published on the Web and the need to support typical Web users to access this body of information has become of crucial importance. Question Answering systems over Linked Data try to address this need by allowing users to query Linked Data using natural language. These systems may query at the same time different heterogenous interlinked datasets, that may provide different results for the same query. The obtained results can be related by a wide range of heterogenous relations, e.g., one can be the specification of the other, an acronym of the other, etc. In other cases, such results can contain an inconsistent set of information about the same topic. A well known example of such heterogenous interlinked datasets are language-specific DBpedia chapters, where the same information may be reported in different languages. Given the growing importance of multilingualism in the Semantic Web community, and in Question Answering over Linked Data in particular, we choose to apply information reconciliation to this scenario. In this paper, we address the issue of reconciling information obtained by querying the SPARQL endpoints of language-specific DBpedia chapters. Starting from a categorization of the possible relations among the resulting instances, we provide a framework to: (i) classify such relations, (ii) reconcile information using argumentation theory, (iii) rank the alternative results depending on the confidence of the source in case of inconsistencies, and (iv) explain the reasons underlying the proposed ranking. We release the resource obtained applying our framework to a set of language-specific DBpedia chapters, and we integrate such framework in the Question Answering system QAKiS, that exploits such chapters as RDF datasets to be queried using a natural language interface.","PeriodicalId":48694,"journal":{"name":"Semantic Web","volume":"1 1","pages":"601-617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Semantic Web","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-160245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In the latest years, more and more structured data is published on the Web and the need to support typical Web users to access this body of information has become of crucial importance. Question Answering systems over Linked Data try to address this need by allowing users to query Linked Data using natural language. These systems may query at the same time different heterogenous interlinked datasets, that may provide different results for the same query. The obtained results can be related by a wide range of heterogenous relations, e.g., one can be the specification of the other, an acronym of the other, etc. In other cases, such results can contain an inconsistent set of information about the same topic. A well known example of such heterogenous interlinked datasets are language-specific DBpedia chapters, where the same information may be reported in different languages. Given the growing importance of multilingualism in the Semantic Web community, and in Question Answering over Linked Data in particular, we choose to apply information reconciliation to this scenario. In this paper, we address the issue of reconciling information obtained by querying the SPARQL endpoints of language-specific DBpedia chapters. Starting from a categorization of the possible relations among the resulting instances, we provide a framework to: (i) classify such relations, (ii) reconcile information using argumentation theory, (iii) rank the alternative results depending on the confidence of the source in case of inconsistencies, and (iv) explain the reasons underlying the proposed ranking. We release the resource obtained applying our framework to a set of language-specific DBpedia chapters, and we integrate such framework in the Question Answering system QAKiS, that exploits such chapters as RDF datasets to be queried using a natural language interface.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于关联数据的问答系统信息协调雷达
近年来,越来越多的结构化数据发布在Web上,支持典型Web用户访问这些信息体的需求变得至关重要。关联数据上的问答系统试图通过允许用户使用自然语言查询关联数据来解决这一需求。这些系统可以同时查询不同的异构互连数据集,这可能为相同的查询提供不同的结果。所获得的结果可以通过广泛的异质关系联系起来,例如,一个可以是另一个的规范,另一个的首字母缩略词,等等。在其他情况下,这样的结果可能包含关于同一主题的一组不一致的信息。这种异构互连数据集的一个众所周知的例子是特定于语言的DBpedia章节,其中可以用不同的语言报告相同的信息。考虑到多语言在语义Web社区中日益增长的重要性,特别是在关联数据的问答中,我们选择将信息协调应用于此场景。在本文中,我们解决了通过查询特定于语言的DBpedia章节的SPARQL端点获得的信息的协调问题。从对结果实例之间可能的关系进行分类开始,我们提供了一个框架:(i)对这些关系进行分类,(ii)使用论证理论调和信息,(iii)在不一致的情况下根据来源的置信度对备选结果进行排名,以及(iv)解释拟议排名背后的原因。我们将应用框架获得的资源释放到一组特定于语言的DBpedia章节中,并将这样的框架集成到问答系统QAKiS中,该系统利用这些章节作为RDF数据集,使用自然语言接口进行查询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Semantic Web
Semantic Web COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEC-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The journal Semantic Web – Interoperability, Usability, Applicability brings together researchers from various fields which share the vision and need for more effective and meaningful ways to share information across agents and services on the future internet and elsewhere. As such, Semantic Web technologies shall support the seamless integration of data, on-the-fly composition and interoperation of Web services, as well as more intuitive search engines. The semantics – or meaning – of information, however, cannot be defined without a context, which makes personalization, trust, and provenance core topics for Semantic Web research. New retrieval paradigms, user interfaces, and visualization techniques have to unleash the power of the Semantic Web and at the same time hide its complexity from the user. Based on this vision, the journal welcomes contributions ranging from theoretical and foundational research over methods and tools to descriptions of concrete ontologies and applications in all areas. We especially welcome papers which add a social, spatial, and temporal dimension to Semantic Web research, as well as application-oriented papers making use of formal semantics.
期刊最新文献
Wikidata subsetting: Approaches, tools, and evaluation An ontology of 3D environment where a simulated manipulation task takes place (ENVON) Sem@ K: Is my knowledge graph embedding model semantic-aware? Using semantic story maps to describe a territory beyond its map NeuSyRE: Neuro-symbolic visual understanding and reasoning framework based on scene graph enrichment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1