Peanut and Weed Response to Postemergence Herbicide Tank-Mixtures Including Paraquat and Inorganic Liquid Nutrients

Peanut Science Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.3146/ps20-12.1
K. Eason, T. Grey, R. Tubbs, E. Prostko, Xiao Li
{"title":"Peanut and Weed Response to Postemergence Herbicide Tank-Mixtures Including Paraquat and Inorganic Liquid Nutrients","authors":"K. Eason, T. Grey, R. Tubbs, E. Prostko, Xiao Li","doi":"10.3146/ps20-12.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Weed control is an integral part of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production systems. Paraquat is a staple postemergence (POST) herbicide used in peanut production in the Southeast US. Inorganic liquid nutrient (ILN) concentrates are liquid fertilizers that are recommended for use by producers in tank-mixtures with paraquat by some distributors. Irrigated and non-irrigated field trials were conducted to quantify the safening effect of ILN in various herbicide tank-mixtures on peanut and determine the suitability as tank-mix replacements for bentazon. Field studies indicated similar POST herbicide responses for peanut injury. Greenhouse experiments evaluated POST paraquat tank-mixtures with ILN for weed control and biomass reduction. Paraquat plus S-metolachlor caused significant leaf burn and stunting. Greatest peanut foliar injury occurred 3 d after treatment (DAT) but was transient. For the irrigated field trial, paraquat plus S-metolachlor plus ILN had similar injury levels as compared to paraquat plus S-metolachlor plus acifluorfen plus bentazon at 22 to 25%. For the non-irrigated field study, the application of paraquat plus ILN had 10% injury compared to paraquat at 22%. While injury was the greatest directly following application, peanut was able to recover with no yield or grade loss for both the irrigated and non-irrigated studies. In the greenhouse study, the effect of ILN varied by weed species and reduced leaf injury on several broadleaf weeds. While the addition of ILN to the various paraquat tank-mixtures initially reduced injury, it did not correspond to increases in yield or grade. The variability in weed control, transient injury mitigation, and no yield increase indicates that Georgia peanut growers will receive no benefit for including ILN in their paraquat tank-mixtures but if needed to improve crop nutrition, ILN will not reduce weed control.","PeriodicalId":19823,"journal":{"name":"Peanut Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peanut Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3146/ps20-12.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Weed control is an integral part of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production systems. Paraquat is a staple postemergence (POST) herbicide used in peanut production in the Southeast US. Inorganic liquid nutrient (ILN) concentrates are liquid fertilizers that are recommended for use by producers in tank-mixtures with paraquat by some distributors. Irrigated and non-irrigated field trials were conducted to quantify the safening effect of ILN in various herbicide tank-mixtures on peanut and determine the suitability as tank-mix replacements for bentazon. Field studies indicated similar POST herbicide responses for peanut injury. Greenhouse experiments evaluated POST paraquat tank-mixtures with ILN for weed control and biomass reduction. Paraquat plus S-metolachlor caused significant leaf burn and stunting. Greatest peanut foliar injury occurred 3 d after treatment (DAT) but was transient. For the irrigated field trial, paraquat plus S-metolachlor plus ILN had similar injury levels as compared to paraquat plus S-metolachlor plus acifluorfen plus bentazon at 22 to 25%. For the non-irrigated field study, the application of paraquat plus ILN had 10% injury compared to paraquat at 22%. While injury was the greatest directly following application, peanut was able to recover with no yield or grade loss for both the irrigated and non-irrigated studies. In the greenhouse study, the effect of ILN varied by weed species and reduced leaf injury on several broadleaf weeds. While the addition of ILN to the various paraquat tank-mixtures initially reduced injury, it did not correspond to increases in yield or grade. The variability in weed control, transient injury mitigation, and no yield increase indicates that Georgia peanut growers will receive no benefit for including ILN in their paraquat tank-mixtures but if needed to improve crop nutrition, ILN will not reduce weed control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
花生和杂草对含百草枯和无机液体营养物的出苗期混合除草剂的反应
杂草控制是花生(arachhis hypogaea L.)生产系统的一个组成部分。百草枯是美国东南部花生生产中使用的一种主要的羽化后除草剂。无机液体营养物(ILN)浓缩液是一些分销商建议生产商将其与百草枯混合使用的液体肥料。通过灌水和非灌水田间试验,量化了不同除草剂罐式混合物中ILN对花生的安全效果,并确定了罐式混合物替代苯达松的适用性。田间研究表明,施用POST除草剂对花生的伤害有相似的反应。温室试验评价了施用后百草枯混合剂对杂草控制和生物量减少的效果。百草枯加s -甲草胺引起严重的叶片烧伤和发育迟缓。最大的花生叶片损伤发生在处理后3 d (DAT),但是短暂的。在灌溉田间试验中,百草枯加s -异丙甲草胺加ILN的伤害程度与百草枯加s -异丙甲草胺加氟氯芬加苯达松的伤害程度相似,分别为22%到25%。在非灌溉的田间研究中,百草枯加ILN的伤害率为10%,而百草枯的伤害率为22%。虽然直接施用后的伤害最大,但在灌溉和非灌溉研究中,花生都能够恢复,没有产量或等级损失。在温室试验中,不同种类的杂草对ILN的影响不同,对几种阔叶杂草的叶片伤害有所减轻。虽然在各种百草枯罐混合物中加入ILN最初减少了伤害,但它并不对应于产量或等级的增加。杂草控制的可变性、短暂伤害的缓解和产量的不增加表明,格鲁吉亚花生种植者在百草枯罐混合物中加入ILN不会得到任何好处,但如果需要改善作物营养,ILN不会减少杂草控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Field Performance of Georgia-16HO and Florunner Cultivars in the Presence of Tomato Spotted Wilt Field Screening for Tomato Spotted Wilt and White Mold (Stem Rot) Resistance among Peanut Genotypes Effect of Peanut Skin Extracts on the Shelf Life of Unstabilized Peanut Butter Peanut Dryer Noise Levels with and without Muffler U.S. Peanut Quality: Industry Priorities to Mitigate Aflatoxin Risk from Farm to Consumer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1