Tourist Attraction Popularity Mapping based on Geotagged Tweets

T. W. Wibowo, A. Bustomi, A. Sukamdi
{"title":"Tourist Attraction Popularity Mapping based on Geotagged Tweets","authors":"T. W. Wibowo, A. Bustomi, A. Sukamdi","doi":"10.23917/FORGEO.V33I1.8021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of tourist attractions is now highly influenced by social media. The speed at which information can be disseminated via the Internet has become an essential factor in enabling distinct tourist attractions to potentially gain high popularity in a relatively short time. This condition was not as prevalent several years ago when tourism promotion remained limited to a certain kind of media. As a consequence, rapid change in the relative popularity of tourist attractions is inevitable. Against this, knowledge of tourist attraction hotspots is essential in tourism management. This means there is a need to study how to both quickly determine the popularity level of tourist attractions and encompass a relatively large area. This article utilised tweet data from microblogging website Twitter as the basis from which to determine the popularity level of a tourist attraction. Data mining was conducted using Python and the Tweepy module. The tweet data were collected at the end of April and early May 2017, at times when there are several long holiday weekends. A Tweet Proximity Index (TPI) was used to calculate both the density and frequency of tweets based on a defined search radius. A Density Index (DI) was also used as a technique for determining the popularity. The results from both approaches were then compared to a random survey about people’s perceptions of tourist attractions in the study area. The result shows that geotagged tweet data can be used to determine the popularity of a tourist attraction, although it still only achieved a medium level of accuracy. The TPI approach used in this study produced an accuracy of 76.47%, while the DI achieved only 58.82%. This medium accuracy does indicate that the two approaches are not yet strong enough to be used for decision-making but should be more than adequate as an initial description. Further, it is necessary to improve the method of indexing and the exploration of other aspects of Twitter data.","PeriodicalId":31244,"journal":{"name":"Forum Geografi","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum Geografi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23917/FORGEO.V33I1.8021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The development of tourist attractions is now highly influenced by social media. The speed at which information can be disseminated via the Internet has become an essential factor in enabling distinct tourist attractions to potentially gain high popularity in a relatively short time. This condition was not as prevalent several years ago when tourism promotion remained limited to a certain kind of media. As a consequence, rapid change in the relative popularity of tourist attractions is inevitable. Against this, knowledge of tourist attraction hotspots is essential in tourism management. This means there is a need to study how to both quickly determine the popularity level of tourist attractions and encompass a relatively large area. This article utilised tweet data from microblogging website Twitter as the basis from which to determine the popularity level of a tourist attraction. Data mining was conducted using Python and the Tweepy module. The tweet data were collected at the end of April and early May 2017, at times when there are several long holiday weekends. A Tweet Proximity Index (TPI) was used to calculate both the density and frequency of tweets based on a defined search radius. A Density Index (DI) was also used as a technique for determining the popularity. The results from both approaches were then compared to a random survey about people’s perceptions of tourist attractions in the study area. The result shows that geotagged tweet data can be used to determine the popularity of a tourist attraction, although it still only achieved a medium level of accuracy. The TPI approach used in this study produced an accuracy of 76.47%, while the DI achieved only 58.82%. This medium accuracy does indicate that the two approaches are not yet strong enough to be used for decision-making but should be more than adequate as an initial description. Further, it is necessary to improve the method of indexing and the exploration of other aspects of Twitter data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于地理标记推文的旅游景点人气映射
如今,旅游景点的发展深受社交媒体的影响。通过互联网传播信息的速度已成为使独特的旅游景点能够在相对较短的时间内获得高知名度的一个重要因素。几年前,这种情况并不普遍,当时旅游推广还局限于某种媒体。因此,旅游景点相对受欢迎程度的迅速变化是不可避免的。与此相反,了解旅游景点热点在旅游管理中是必不可少的。这意味着需要研究如何快速确定旅游景点的受欢迎程度并涵盖相对较大的区域。本文利用微博网站Twitter的推文数据作为确定旅游景点受欢迎程度的依据。使用Python和Tweepy模块进行数据挖掘。推特数据是在2017年4月底和5月初收集的,当时有几个长假周末。基于定义的搜索半径,使用Tweet邻近指数(TPI)计算Tweet的密度和频率。密度指数(DI)也被用作确定受欢迎程度的技术。然后将这两种方法的结果与一项关于人们对研究地区旅游景点的看法的随机调查进行比较。结果表明,地理标记的tweet数据可以用来确定旅游景点的受欢迎程度,尽管它仍然只达到了中等水平的准确性。本研究中使用的TPI方法准确率为76.47%,而DI仅达到58.82%。这种中等精度确实表明,这两种方法还不足以用于决策,但作为初步描述应该绰绰有余。此外,需要改进索引方法和对Twitter数据其他方面的探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tourism Investment and Land Use Change in the Northern Piedmont of the Western High Atlas (1989-2022) Criminological Insights: A Comprehensive Spatial Analysis of Crime Hot Spots of Property Offenses in Malaysia's Urban Centers Analysis of Chlorophyll-a Variability in the Eastern Indonesian Waters Using Sentinel-3 OLCI from 2020-2021 Spatial Modelling Analysis for Potential Expansion of Cipanas City Candidate Area as Autonomous City Localizing Global Standards in Toba, Indonesia Through a Tourist-Centric Perspective On UNESCO Guidelines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1