Elicitation of criteria weights for multicriteria models: Bibliometrics, typologies, characteristics and applications

IF 1.9 Q3 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.14488/BJOPM.2021.014
Fabrício Freitas da Silva, Cláudio Luiz Melo de Souza, Fábio Freitas da Silva, H. G. Costa, H. D. Hora, Milton Erthal Junior
{"title":"Elicitation of criteria weights for multicriteria models: Bibliometrics, typologies, characteristics and applications","authors":"Fabrício Freitas da Silva, Cláudio Luiz Melo de Souza, Fábio Freitas da Silva, H. G. Costa, H. D. Hora, Milton Erthal Junior","doi":"10.14488/BJOPM.2021.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Goal: This study aims to review and classify the main methods of criteria weights definition. Design / Methodology / Approach: From a systematized search were articles selected and analyzed, covering a timeline between 1949 and 2020. Results: Fifty sex methods were identified and discussed. Most (49) are subjective, eleven are objectives and three are hybrids. Considering the aggregation procedure, 33 are compensatory and 23 are non-compensatory. Most of the methods are for a single decision maker and just eleven are multidecision makers. The main contributions are published on European Journal of Operational Research journal. Limitations of the investigation: This work does not make a thorough technical analysis of the presented methods and it is not a notebook to indicate to researchers which method is the best for each type of situation. Some methods may not have been included. Practical implications: The selection and the definition of criteria weight is a fundamental question in the Multicriteria Decision Aid (MDCA) approach. The MCDA has a wide application on operation and production management. The diversity of published papers on this subject, the comprehension of its characteristics and applicability is a complex task for researchers and professionals who demand these techniques. Originality / Value: This work contributes to identify the state of the art of the models applied to the weight of the criteria, as well as to identify its characteristics and functionality regarding MCDA modeling.","PeriodicalId":54139,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2021.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Goal: This study aims to review and classify the main methods of criteria weights definition. Design / Methodology / Approach: From a systematized search were articles selected and analyzed, covering a timeline between 1949 and 2020. Results: Fifty sex methods were identified and discussed. Most (49) are subjective, eleven are objectives and three are hybrids. Considering the aggregation procedure, 33 are compensatory and 23 are non-compensatory. Most of the methods are for a single decision maker and just eleven are multidecision makers. The main contributions are published on European Journal of Operational Research journal. Limitations of the investigation: This work does not make a thorough technical analysis of the presented methods and it is not a notebook to indicate to researchers which method is the best for each type of situation. Some methods may not have been included. Practical implications: The selection and the definition of criteria weight is a fundamental question in the Multicriteria Decision Aid (MDCA) approach. The MCDA has a wide application on operation and production management. The diversity of published papers on this subject, the comprehension of its characteristics and applicability is a complex task for researchers and professionals who demand these techniques. Originality / Value: This work contributes to identify the state of the art of the models applied to the weight of the criteria, as well as to identify its characteristics and functionality regarding MCDA modeling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多标准模型的标准权重的推导:文献计量学、类型学、特征和应用
目的:对标准权重定义的主要方法进行综述和分类。设计/方法/方法:从系统化的搜索中选择并分析了文章,涵盖了1949年至2020年的时间轴。结果:确定并讨论了50种性方法。大多数(49个)是主观的,11个是客观的,3个是混合的。考虑到聚合过程,33个是补偿性的,23个是非补偿性的。大多数方法适用于单个决策者,只有11种方法适用于多个决策者。主要论文发表在《欧洲运筹学杂志》上。调查的局限性:这项工作没有对所提出的方法进行彻底的技术分析,也不是向研究人员指出哪种方法最适合每种情况的笔记本。有些方法可能没有包括在内。实际意义:标准权重的选择和定义是多标准决策辅助(MDCA)方法中的一个基本问题。MCDA在操作和生产管理中有着广泛的应用。对于需要这些技术的研究人员和专业人员来说,关于这一主题发表的论文的多样性、对其特征和适用性的理解是一项复杂的任务。原创性/价值:这项工作有助于确定应用于标准权重的模型的技术状态,以及确定其关于MCDA建模的特征和功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sustainability and Operational Excellence opportunities with Industry 4.0, Lean and Circular Economy Analysis of the application of recycled polypropylene Productivity in a pandemic Analysis of product-service system logistics strategies in e-commerce An ERP implementation on a beekeeping and honey value chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1