Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin Resistant S. aureus in Commercial Soft Drink with Antimicrobial Resistance Test on Isolates in Ethiopia

A. Hiko
{"title":"Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin Resistant S. aureus in Commercial Soft Drink with Antimicrobial Resistance Test on Isolates in Ethiopia","authors":"A. Hiko","doi":"10.4172/1948-5948.1000393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Staphylococcus aureus is common food contaminant and responsible for food poising. The aim of this study was to assess prevalence of S. aureus and Methicillin Resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in Commercial Soft Drinks (CSDs) with antimicrobial resistance test on the isolates in two towns of Ethiopia. A total of 774 samples of ready-to-drink CSDs were randomly purchases from different public supply locations and analyzed for S. aureus. MRSA were screened phenotypically using Cefoxitin (FOX 30 μg) disk diffusion method. All of studied CSD products were within manufacturer shelf life. An overall 28 (3.6%) and 5 (0.6%) S. aureus and MRSA were observed, respectively. Similar prevalence of S. aureus ranging from 1.0-4.8% and 1.2-6.6% were observed by product category and by public supply location, respectively. Significantly higher (10.7%; OR=12, 95%OR CI: 6.1-23.7) S. aureus in carton box packed than in glass bottle canned (2.3%) and metal canned (2.4%) products were observed. S. aureus prevalence was higher in CSD products from Bangladesh (17.9%; OR=21.6, 95% OR CI: 10.3-45.6) and Portugal (8.9%; OR=9.8, 95% OR CI: 3.6-26.2) than from Ethiopia (1.3%; OR=1.3, 95% OR CI: 0.5-3.3). Prevalence of MRSA ranged from 0-6.7% within studied variable. High (64.3%) S. aureus were resistant to erythromycin followed by 32.2% to ampicillin. Equal, (21.4%) of S. aureus were resistant to streptomycin, amoxicillin and chloramphenicol. All of MRSA were resistant erythromycin. Equal, 4 (80.0%) MRSA were resistant to amoxicillin and chloramphenicol. No resistant S. aureus and MRSA were observed to gentamycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. All MRSA isolates were also not resistant to ciprofloxacin. Eighteen S. aureus isolates were resistant to at least single to multiple of six drugs used in the study. Data indicated possible contamination of CDS products with S. aureus and MRSA including MDR strain during processing and post-process handling.","PeriodicalId":16453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology","volume":"118 1","pages":"40-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5948.1000393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is common food contaminant and responsible for food poising. The aim of this study was to assess prevalence of S. aureus and Methicillin Resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in Commercial Soft Drinks (CSDs) with antimicrobial resistance test on the isolates in two towns of Ethiopia. A total of 774 samples of ready-to-drink CSDs were randomly purchases from different public supply locations and analyzed for S. aureus. MRSA were screened phenotypically using Cefoxitin (FOX 30 μg) disk diffusion method. All of studied CSD products were within manufacturer shelf life. An overall 28 (3.6%) and 5 (0.6%) S. aureus and MRSA were observed, respectively. Similar prevalence of S. aureus ranging from 1.0-4.8% and 1.2-6.6% were observed by product category and by public supply location, respectively. Significantly higher (10.7%; OR=12, 95%OR CI: 6.1-23.7) S. aureus in carton box packed than in glass bottle canned (2.3%) and metal canned (2.4%) products were observed. S. aureus prevalence was higher in CSD products from Bangladesh (17.9%; OR=21.6, 95% OR CI: 10.3-45.6) and Portugal (8.9%; OR=9.8, 95% OR CI: 3.6-26.2) than from Ethiopia (1.3%; OR=1.3, 95% OR CI: 0.5-3.3). Prevalence of MRSA ranged from 0-6.7% within studied variable. High (64.3%) S. aureus were resistant to erythromycin followed by 32.2% to ampicillin. Equal, (21.4%) of S. aureus were resistant to streptomycin, amoxicillin and chloramphenicol. All of MRSA were resistant erythromycin. Equal, 4 (80.0%) MRSA were resistant to amoxicillin and chloramphenicol. No resistant S. aureus and MRSA were observed to gentamycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. All MRSA isolates were also not resistant to ciprofloxacin. Eighteen S. aureus isolates were resistant to at least single to multiple of six drugs used in the study. Data indicated possible contamination of CDS products with S. aureus and MRSA including MDR strain during processing and post-process handling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚商品软饮料中金黄色葡萄球菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的耐药性试验
金黄色葡萄球菌是常见的食品污染物,是导致食物中毒的主要原因。本研究的目的是通过对埃塞俄比亚两个城镇的商业软饮料(CSDs)中金黄色葡萄球菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的耐药性试验,评估其流行情况。本署从不同的公共供应地点随机购入774份即食食物样本,分析是否含有金黄色葡萄球菌。采用头孢西丁(FOX 30 μg)圆盘扩散法对MRSA进行表型筛选。所有研究的CSD产品都在制造商的保质期内。共检出金黄色葡萄球菌28例(3.6%),MRSA 5例(0.6%)。不同产品类别和公共供应地点的金黄色葡萄球菌患病率相似,分别为1.0-4.8%和1.2-6.6%。显著提高(10.7%;OR=12, 95%OR CI: 6.1 ~ 23.7)纸箱包装中金黄色葡萄球菌的检出率高于玻璃瓶罐装(2.3%)和金属罐装(2.4%)。金黄色葡萄球菌在来自孟加拉国的CSD产品中的患病率较高(17.9%;OR=21.6, 95% OR CI: 10.3-45.6)和葡萄牙(8.9%;OR=9.8, 95% OR CI: 3.6-26.2)比埃塞俄比亚(1.3%;Or =1.3, 95%或ci: 0.5-3.3)。MRSA的患病率在研究变量范围内为0-6.7%。金黄色葡萄球菌对红霉素耐药率高(64.3%),对氨苄西林耐药率高(32.2%)。对链霉素、阿莫西林和氯霉素耐药的金黄色葡萄球菌各占21.4%。所有MRSA均对红霉素耐药。4例(80.0%)MRSA对阿莫西林和氯霉素耐药。庆大霉素和甲氧苄啶磺胺甲恶唑均未发现耐药金黄色葡萄球菌和MRSA。所有MRSA分离株对环丙沙星也无耐药性。18株金黄色葡萄球菌对研究中使用的6种药物中的至少一种或多种具有耐药性。数据表明,CDS产品在加工和加工后处理过程中可能受到金黄色葡萄球菌和MRSA(包括MDR菌株)的污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Types of Techniques Involved in Bioremediation Microbial Nutrition and Growth Latest Trends in Microbial Biofuels Covid-19 pandemic in India: Commentary Seperation of Bacteria from Soil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1