THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 CRISIS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INFORMATION SOCIETY IN SLOVENIA

Q1 Social Sciences Administratie si Management Public Pub Date : 2022-11-25 DOI:10.24818/amp/2022.39-05
M. Dečman, J. Stare, Maja Klun
{"title":"THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 CRISIS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INFORMATION SOCIETY IN SLOVENIA","authors":"M. Dečman, J. Stare, Maja Klun","doi":"10.24818/amp/2022.39-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital transformation is trending pursuant to the almost ubiquitous use of digital technology by private and public sectors, and general populations. The disruption caused by advancing technology requires strategic responses to mitigate the negative aspects of such disruption and generate positive change. Other disruption, moreover, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, additionally imposes limitations on what we consider to be normal life, further engendering the utilization of digital technology. Even though the impact of digital transformation can be assessed by means of different metrics, including the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI), they do not provide sufficient clarity in terms of pain points and improvement possibilities. The differences in relation to the availability of said technology and the skills necessary for its optimal use, which are closely related to user education level, age, and economic status, are additional parameters governments and policymakers need to consider, and data-driven decision-making is essential to ensure optimal policy-making and investment vis-à-vis digital transformation, such as the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility. This paper analyses Slovenia’s digital transformation between 2018 and 2021, using data collected from more than 5,000 respondents, to detect technology use differences in terms of demographics, focusing on the digital divide and the COVID-19 crisis, and compares Slovenia’s experience with other EU Member States, focusing especially on online public administration services. Our results evidence that the digital divide is the main differentiating factor in Slovenia and that gender is accordingly not of great import, and that Slovenia’s oldest generation and some members of younger generations face problems when endeavoring to digitally integrate. Compared to other EU Member States, Slovenia is average according to DESI, but the findings show that EU Member States should take its specifics into account to address their own DT paradigm.","PeriodicalId":38266,"journal":{"name":"Administratie si Management Public","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administratie si Management Public","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2022.39-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Digital transformation is trending pursuant to the almost ubiquitous use of digital technology by private and public sectors, and general populations. The disruption caused by advancing technology requires strategic responses to mitigate the negative aspects of such disruption and generate positive change. Other disruption, moreover, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, additionally imposes limitations on what we consider to be normal life, further engendering the utilization of digital technology. Even though the impact of digital transformation can be assessed by means of different metrics, including the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI), they do not provide sufficient clarity in terms of pain points and improvement possibilities. The differences in relation to the availability of said technology and the skills necessary for its optimal use, which are closely related to user education level, age, and economic status, are additional parameters governments and policymakers need to consider, and data-driven decision-making is essential to ensure optimal policy-making and investment vis-à-vis digital transformation, such as the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility. This paper analyses Slovenia’s digital transformation between 2018 and 2021, using data collected from more than 5,000 respondents, to detect technology use differences in terms of demographics, focusing on the digital divide and the COVID-19 crisis, and compares Slovenia’s experience with other EU Member States, focusing especially on online public administration services. Our results evidence that the digital divide is the main differentiating factor in Slovenia and that gender is accordingly not of great import, and that Slovenia’s oldest generation and some members of younger generations face problems when endeavoring to digitally integrate. Compared to other EU Member States, Slovenia is average according to DESI, but the findings show that EU Member States should take its specifics into account to address their own DT paradigm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19危机对斯洛文尼亚信息社会发展的影响
随着数字技术在私营和公共部门以及一般人群中的几乎无处不在的使用,数字化转型正在成为趋势。先进技术造成的破坏需要战略性的应对措施,以减轻这种破坏的负面影响,并产生积极的变化。此外,COVID-19大流行等其他干扰也对我们认为的正常生活施加了限制,进一步催生了对数字技术的利用。尽管数字化转型的影响可以通过不同的指标来评估,包括数字经济和社会指数(DESI),但它们在痛点和改进可能性方面并没有提供足够的清晰度。上述技术的可用性和最佳使用所需技能的差异与用户的教育水平、年龄和经济状况密切相关,这是政府和政策制定者需要考虑的额外参数,数据驱动的决策对于确保对-à-vis数字化转型的最佳决策和投资至关重要,例如欧盟恢复和弹性基金。本文利用从5000多名受访者收集的数据,分析了斯洛文尼亚在2018年至2021年之间的数字化转型,以数字鸿沟和COVID-19危机为重点,检测人口统计学方面的技术使用差异,并将斯洛文尼亚与其他欧盟成员国的经验进行了比较,特别关注在线公共行政服务。我们的研究结果表明,数字鸿沟是斯洛文尼亚的主要差异因素,因此性别并不重要,斯洛文尼亚最年长的一代和年轻一代的一些成员在努力进行数字整合时面临问题。与其他欧盟成员国相比,根据DESI,斯洛文尼亚是平均水平,但研究结果表明,欧盟成员国应考虑其具体情况,以解决自己的DT范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Administratie si Management Public
Administratie si Management Public Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Is an international academic journal, published by The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Faculty of Administration and Public Management and the International Centre for Public Management. Is an open access journal published in English, twice a year. Is double peer-reviewed. Includes articles prepared by scholars, researchers and practitioners. Is addressed to the teachers, researchers, Ph. D students, master students, undergraduate students, public managers, civil servants and to other categories of readers. The papers published in this journal: - Contain the research results of some researches and surveys developed by the authors. - Include new theoretical/practical and original approaches that were presented and analysed by the authors. - Offer solutions for the public managers problems. - Stimulate the know-how transfer from an institution to another, from a country to another in the areas of administration and public management. The paper proposed for evaluation can be sent throughout the year, preferably by the end of April or before the end of October. Main areas covered by the journal articles are: public management; public administration; public policy; public services; social economy; social environment; management of the nongovernmental organizations; human resources management in the public sector; decision making in public organizations; governance; communication in public sector; sociology; demografy; migration; globalization; other related domains.
期刊最新文献
Government assistance programs for internally displaced persons: assessing the impact on economic growth and labour market Greening public organisations: is there room for pro-environmental public servants to participate? Decision support in the budget management of a public institution: a constructivist multicriteria model Differences of motivation profile of public sector employees in Israel depending on age and job seniority New Public Management rhetoric in developing country: will agencification and management control lead to organisational culture transformation?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1