Discriminating Shale Layers by Pseudo CGR Logs Created Using Artificial Intelligence

Saud Aldajani, S. Alotaibi, A. Abdulraheem
{"title":"Discriminating Shale Layers by Pseudo CGR Logs Created Using Artificial Intelligence","authors":"Saud Aldajani, S. Alotaibi, A. Abdulraheem","doi":"10.2118/208663-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The discrimination of shale vs. non-shale layers significantly influences the quality of reservoir geological model. In this study, a novel approach was implemented to enhance the model by creating Pseudo Corrected Gamma Ray (CGR) logs using Artificial Intelligence methods to identify the thin shale beds within the reservoir.\n The lithology of the carbonate reservoir understudy is mostly composed of dolomite and limestone rock with minor amounts of anhydrite and thin shale layers. The identification of shale layers is challenging because of the nature of such reservoirs. The high organic content of the shales and the presence of dolomites, particularly the floatstones and rudstones, can adversely affect the log quality and interpretation and may result in inaccurate log correlations, overestimating/ underestimating Original Oil In Place (OOIP) and reservoir net pays.\n In such cases, Corrected Gamma Ray (CGR) curves are typically used to identify shale layers. The CGR curve response is due to the combination of thorium and potassium that is associated with the clay content. The difference between the total GR and the CGR is essentially the amount of uranium-associated organic matter. Because of the very limited number of CGR logs in this reservoir, Artificial Intelligence (AI) approach was used to identify shale volume across the entire reservoir.\n Synthetic CGR curves were generated for the wells lacking CGR logs using AI methods. Resistivity, Density, Neutron and total GR logs were used as inputs while CGR was set as the target. Five wells that have CGR logs were used to train the model. The created pseudo logs were then used to identify shale layers and could also be used to correct effective porosity logs.\n After statistical analysis of the data, two different Artificial Intelligence Techniques were tested to predict CGR logs; Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN).\n A Sugeno-type FIS structure using subtractive clustering demonstrated the best prediction with correlation coefficient of 0.96 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 20%. The resulting synthetic CGR curves helped identify shale layers that do not extend over the entire reservoir area and ultimately correct the effective porosity logs in the reservoir model. Porosity was primarily obtained from the neutron-density logs which results in very high porosity measurements across the shale layers.\n This study shows a new workflow to predict shale layers in Carbonate reservoirs. The created pseudo CGR logs would help predict shale and is an added-value data that could be incorporated into the Earth model.","PeriodicalId":10904,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 19, 2021","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 19, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208663-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The discrimination of shale vs. non-shale layers significantly influences the quality of reservoir geological model. In this study, a novel approach was implemented to enhance the model by creating Pseudo Corrected Gamma Ray (CGR) logs using Artificial Intelligence methods to identify the thin shale beds within the reservoir. The lithology of the carbonate reservoir understudy is mostly composed of dolomite and limestone rock with minor amounts of anhydrite and thin shale layers. The identification of shale layers is challenging because of the nature of such reservoirs. The high organic content of the shales and the presence of dolomites, particularly the floatstones and rudstones, can adversely affect the log quality and interpretation and may result in inaccurate log correlations, overestimating/ underestimating Original Oil In Place (OOIP) and reservoir net pays. In such cases, Corrected Gamma Ray (CGR) curves are typically used to identify shale layers. The CGR curve response is due to the combination of thorium and potassium that is associated with the clay content. The difference between the total GR and the CGR is essentially the amount of uranium-associated organic matter. Because of the very limited number of CGR logs in this reservoir, Artificial Intelligence (AI) approach was used to identify shale volume across the entire reservoir. Synthetic CGR curves were generated for the wells lacking CGR logs using AI methods. Resistivity, Density, Neutron and total GR logs were used as inputs while CGR was set as the target. Five wells that have CGR logs were used to train the model. The created pseudo logs were then used to identify shale layers and could also be used to correct effective porosity logs. After statistical analysis of the data, two different Artificial Intelligence Techniques were tested to predict CGR logs; Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). A Sugeno-type FIS structure using subtractive clustering demonstrated the best prediction with correlation coefficient of 0.96 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 20%. The resulting synthetic CGR curves helped identify shale layers that do not extend over the entire reservoir area and ultimately correct the effective porosity logs in the reservoir model. Porosity was primarily obtained from the neutron-density logs which results in very high porosity measurements across the shale layers. This study shows a new workflow to predict shale layers in Carbonate reservoirs. The created pseudo CGR logs would help predict shale and is an added-value data that could be incorporated into the Earth model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用人工智能生成的伪CGR日志识别页岩层
页岩层与非页岩层的区分对储层地质模型的质量有重要影响。在这项研究中,采用了一种新的方法来增强模型,即使用人工智能方法创建伪校正伽马射线(CGR)测井曲线,以识别储层内的薄页岩层。碳酸盐岩储层岩性以白云岩、灰岩为主,含少量硬石膏和薄页岩。由于页岩储层的性质,页岩储层的识别具有挑战性。页岩的高有机质含量和白云岩(特别是浮岩和原生岩)的存在会对测井质量和解释产生不利影响,并可能导致测井相关性不准确,高估/低估原始油储量(OOIP)和储层净产油。在这种情况下,校正伽马射线(CGR)曲线通常用于识别页岩层。CGR曲线的响应是由于钍和钾的结合,这与粘土含量有关。总GR和CGR之间的差异本质上是铀伴生有机物的数量。由于该储层的CGR测井数量非常有限,因此采用了人工智能(AI)方法来确定整个储层的页岩体积。利用人工智能方法对缺乏CGR测井曲线的井生成了合成CGR曲线。以电阻率、密度、中子和总GR测井作为输入,以CGR为目标。使用了5口具有CGR测井曲线的井来训练模型。生成的伪测井曲线可用于识别页岩层,也可用于校正有效孔隙度测井曲线。在对数据进行统计分析后,测试了两种不同的人工智能技术来预测CGR测井曲线;自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)和人工神经网络(ANN)。采用减法聚类的sugeno型FIS结构预测效果最佳,相关系数为0.96,平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)为20%。合成的CGR曲线有助于识别没有延伸到整个储层区域的页岩层,并最终校正储层模型中的有效孔隙度测井曲线。孔隙度主要是通过中子密度测井获得的,这使得页岩层的孔隙度测量结果非常高。该研究为预测碳酸盐岩储层页岩层提供了一种新的工作流程。生成的伪CGR测井将有助于预测页岩,并且是一种附加价值数据,可以整合到地球模型中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Control of malodorous gases emission from wet-end white water with hydrogen peroxide Application of spruce wood flour as a cellulosic-based wood additive for recycled paper applications— A pilot paper machine study Corrosion damage and in-service inspection of retractable sootblower lances in recovery boilers Kraft recovery boiler operation with splash plate and/or beer can nozzles — a case study Application of Machine Learning in Gas-Hydrate Formation and Trendline Prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1