More real, or just more surveillance? Panopticism and shifting authenticity paradigms in BeReal

IF 13.4 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Nano Convergence Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1177/13548565231199987
Jessica Maddox
{"title":"More real, or just more surveillance? Panopticism and shifting authenticity paradigms in BeReal","authors":"Jessica Maddox","doi":"10.1177/13548565231199987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BeReal has become a popular app among younger social media users, with a premise that privileges a brief, random, and unvarnished look into one’s life once a day. Hailed as the ‘anti-Instagram’ or ‘anti-TikTok’, the app eschews filters, performance, influencers, and sponsored content in favor of authenticity. While curated authenticity has long been a hallmark of internet culture, BeReal seems to employ authenticity not as a performance strategy but as a value, tapping into criticisms of the inauthentic. Through the walkthrough method of social media app analysis, I employ ethnographic research tenets to analyze how BeReal forwards a different type of authenticity to its users from its discourse, design, interface, and features. The findings are two-fold: First, BeReal privileges authenticity-as-realness instead of authenticity-as-performance, using spontaneity and timed posting windows to severely limit the time one can craft a post. Second, BeReal acts as a panopticon, because the omnipresent possibility of posting means users are always already aware of the potential. Authenticity-as-realness is not uncomplicated; it relies much more heavily on neoliberal self-monitoring and panopticism to be ready for anything, as opposed to a finely tuned and intricately crafted performance with lighting, makeup, and editing. This indicates considerations of authenticity are changing on social media platforms, putting performance at odds with panopticism.","PeriodicalId":712,"journal":{"name":"Nano Convergence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nano Convergence","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231199987","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BeReal has become a popular app among younger social media users, with a premise that privileges a brief, random, and unvarnished look into one’s life once a day. Hailed as the ‘anti-Instagram’ or ‘anti-TikTok’, the app eschews filters, performance, influencers, and sponsored content in favor of authenticity. While curated authenticity has long been a hallmark of internet culture, BeReal seems to employ authenticity not as a performance strategy but as a value, tapping into criticisms of the inauthentic. Through the walkthrough method of social media app analysis, I employ ethnographic research tenets to analyze how BeReal forwards a different type of authenticity to its users from its discourse, design, interface, and features. The findings are two-fold: First, BeReal privileges authenticity-as-realness instead of authenticity-as-performance, using spontaneity and timed posting windows to severely limit the time one can craft a post. Second, BeReal acts as a panopticon, because the omnipresent possibility of posting means users are always already aware of the potential. Authenticity-as-realness is not uncomplicated; it relies much more heavily on neoliberal self-monitoring and panopticism to be ready for anything, as opposed to a finely tuned and intricately crafted performance with lighting, makeup, and editing. This indicates considerations of authenticity are changing on social media platforms, putting performance at odds with panopticism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更真实,还是更多的监视?全景主义与真实范式的变迁
BeReal在年轻的社交媒体用户中已经成为一款很受欢迎的应用程序,它的前提是允许每天一次对一个人的生活进行简短、随机、不加修饰的浏览。这款应用被誉为“反instagram”或“反tiktok”,它避开了过滤器、性能、影响者和赞助内容,支持真实性。虽然精心策划的真实性一直是互联网文化的一个标志,但berreal似乎不是把真实性作为一种表演策略,而是作为一种价值观,利用对不真实的批评。通过社交媒体应用程序分析的演练方法,我运用人种学研究原则,分析BeReal如何从话语、设计、界面和功能等方面向用户传递不同类型的真实性。研究结果有两个方面:首先,berreal推崇真实性即真实性,而不是真实性即性能,它使用自发性和定时发布窗口来严格限制人们撰写帖子的时间。其次,BeReal充当了一个圆形监狱,因为无处不在的发帖可能性意味着用户总是已经意识到潜在的可能性。作为真实的真实性并非简单;它更多地依赖于新自由主义的自我监控和全景主义,为任何事情做好准备,而不是精心调整和精心制作的表演,包括灯光、化妆和编辑。这表明社交媒体平台上对真实性的考虑正在发生变化,这使得表演与全景主义产生了冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nano Convergence
Nano Convergence Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
50
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Nano Convergence is an internationally recognized, peer-reviewed, and interdisciplinary journal designed to foster effective communication among scientists spanning diverse research areas closely aligned with nanoscience and nanotechnology. Dedicated to encouraging the convergence of technologies across the nano- to microscopic scale, the journal aims to unveil novel scientific domains and cultivate fresh research prospects. Operating on a single-blind peer-review system, Nano Convergence ensures transparency in the review process, with reviewers cognizant of authors' names and affiliations while maintaining anonymity in the feedback provided to authors.
期刊最新文献
Investigating composite electrode materials of metal oxides for advanced energy storage applications. Unveiling the distinctive mechanical and thermal properties of γ-GeSe Bacteria extracellular vesicle as nanopharmaceuticals for versatile biomedical potential Correction: 3D-printed wound dressing platform for protein administration based on alginate and zinc oxide tetrapods Monodispersed mesoscopic star-shaped gold particles via silver-ion-assisted multi-directional growth for highly sensitive SERS-active substrates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1