Business Education Learners in the Further Education and Training Phase: Towards the Development of a South African Readiness Model to Strengthen Learners’ Academic Performance

Venicia McGhie, A. Venter, K. Reis
{"title":"Business Education Learners in the Further Education and Training Phase: Towards the Development of a South African Readiness Model to Strengthen Learners’ Academic Performance","authors":"Venicia McGhie, A. Venter, K. Reis","doi":"10.24085/JSAA.V8I2.4444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"African and coloured students continue to perform poorly both at public schools and institutions of higher learning. There are two main reasons for their weak performance – a lack of literacy and numeracy skills, and being under-prepared. This article reports on two findings of a study that was conducted at two high schools in the Western Cape Province. The one high school was a quintile 1, and the other a quintile 4 school. The study aimed to implement intervention strategies over a three year period for Grade 10 to 12 learners in the business-related subjects, Accounting, Business Studies, and Economics. The objective was to develop a readiness model that public schools in South African could use to overcome the challenges so that learners could be equipped with a strong foundation in their primary schooling. The study was situated within a critical education science paradigm and used a critical participatory action research design. Two groups of 30 learners formed the main research participants. Interventions strategies were implemented with the learners when they were in Grade 10 in 2017, in Grade 11 in 2018, and in Grade 12 in 2019. The results show that both groups of learners did not have an adequate rating of 50% and more subject content knowledge and skills when they arrived in Grade 10 in 2017 in all three subjects, and they did not manage to obtain a 50% or more rating in the three subjects in their final examinations at the end of Grade 12 in 2019. Based on the four key principles of the readiness model, recommendations are proposed that would assist public schools to develop and support the learners during the early childhood and foundation phase so that a solid foundation in literacy and numeracy skills could be laid.","PeriodicalId":32008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Student Affairs in Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Student Affairs in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24085/JSAA.V8I2.4444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

African and coloured students continue to perform poorly both at public schools and institutions of higher learning. There are two main reasons for their weak performance – a lack of literacy and numeracy skills, and being under-prepared. This article reports on two findings of a study that was conducted at two high schools in the Western Cape Province. The one high school was a quintile 1, and the other a quintile 4 school. The study aimed to implement intervention strategies over a three year period for Grade 10 to 12 learners in the business-related subjects, Accounting, Business Studies, and Economics. The objective was to develop a readiness model that public schools in South African could use to overcome the challenges so that learners could be equipped with a strong foundation in their primary schooling. The study was situated within a critical education science paradigm and used a critical participatory action research design. Two groups of 30 learners formed the main research participants. Interventions strategies were implemented with the learners when they were in Grade 10 in 2017, in Grade 11 in 2018, and in Grade 12 in 2019. The results show that both groups of learners did not have an adequate rating of 50% and more subject content knowledge and skills when they arrived in Grade 10 in 2017 in all three subjects, and they did not manage to obtain a 50% or more rating in the three subjects in their final examinations at the end of Grade 12 in 2019. Based on the four key principles of the readiness model, recommendations are proposed that would assist public schools to develop and support the learners during the early childhood and foundation phase so that a solid foundation in literacy and numeracy skills could be laid.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商科教育学习者在继续教育和培训阶段:朝着南非准备模式的发展,以加强学习者的学习成绩
非洲学生和有色人种学生在公立学校和高等教育机构的表现仍然很差。他们表现不佳的主要原因有两个——缺乏读写和计算能力,以及准备不足。本文报告了在西开普省的两所高中进行的一项研究的两个发现。一所高中是五分之一,另一所是五分之一。本研究旨在对10至12年级的商业相关科目、会计、商业研究和经济学的学习者实施为期三年的干预策略。其目标是制定一种准备模式,供南非的公立学校用来克服这些挑战,使学习者能够在小学教育中打下坚实的基础。本研究采用批判性教育科学范式,采用批判性参与式行动研究设计。两组30名学习者组成了主要的研究参与者。在2017年10年级、2018年11年级和2019年12年级对学习者实施干预策略。结果表明,两组学习者在2017年10年级时,在所有三个科目中都没有达到50%以上的学科内容知识和技能的足够评分,并且在2019年12年级结束的期末考试中,他们也没有在三个科目中获得50%以上的评分。根据准备模型的四个关键原则,提出了建议,以帮助公立学校在儿童早期和基础阶段发展和支持学习者,从而奠定坚实的读写和计算技能基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hauntological engagements: Visual redress at Stellenbosch University Cyberbullying in Kenyan universities: Lessons and insights from the personal experience of deans of students Postgraduate psychology students’ mental health and coping during COVID-19: Lessons learnt “Did ‘Step-Up’ help in stepping up?” Transition programmes as a factor to improve student academic performance Reflective perspectives of residence heads’ experiences and responses during COVID-19 at a Free State university, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1