Unpacking the blocking effect: Syntactic prominence and perspective-taking in antecedent retrieval in Mandarin Chinese

IF 0.9 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Glossa-A Journal of General Linguistics Pub Date : 2021-10-23 DOI:10.16995/glossa.5781
Jun-Hyun Lyu, E. Kaiser
{"title":"Unpacking the blocking effect: Syntactic prominence and perspective-taking in antecedent retrieval in Mandarin Chinese","authors":"Jun-Hyun Lyu, E. Kaiser","doi":"10.16995/glossa.5781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the linguistics literature, it is generally accepted that the non-local use of the bare reflexive ziji in Mandarin Chinese is sensitive to perspective centers. The introduction of a local first-person pronoun encoding the comprehender’s perspective is assumed to block non-local binding (i.e. make it unavailable), a phenomenon called the blocking effect. However, it is not yet clear whether the blocking effect is absolute, nor whether the syntactic prominence of the blocking pronoun influences the strength of blocking. In this study, we report two sets of offline and online experiments to examine the blocking effect associated with ziji. By comparing the forced choice judgment results in Experiments 1 and 2, we find that syntactically prominent subject blockers lead to stronger blocking compared to object blockers, and that the strength of the blocking effect can be modulated by verb semantics. Furthermore, only subject blockers caused blocking during incremental real-time processing while object blockers did not. The results of these experiments have implications for both the linguistic formulation of the blocking effect and for sentence processing models.","PeriodicalId":46319,"journal":{"name":"Glossa-A Journal of General Linguistics","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glossa-A Journal of General Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In the linguistics literature, it is generally accepted that the non-local use of the bare reflexive ziji in Mandarin Chinese is sensitive to perspective centers. The introduction of a local first-person pronoun encoding the comprehender’s perspective is assumed to block non-local binding (i.e. make it unavailable), a phenomenon called the blocking effect. However, it is not yet clear whether the blocking effect is absolute, nor whether the syntactic prominence of the blocking pronoun influences the strength of blocking. In this study, we report two sets of offline and online experiments to examine the blocking effect associated with ziji. By comparing the forced choice judgment results in Experiments 1 and 2, we find that syntactically prominent subject blockers lead to stronger blocking compared to object blockers, and that the strength of the blocking effect can be modulated by verb semantics. Furthermore, only subject blockers caused blocking during incremental real-time processing while object blockers did not. The results of these experiments have implications for both the linguistic formulation of the blocking effect and for sentence processing models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解封挡效应:汉语先行词检索中的句法突出与换位思考
在语言学文献中,人们普遍认为普通话中裸反身词“子己”的非局部使用对透视中心很敏感。假定引入编码理解者视角的局部第一人称代词会阻止非局部绑定(即使其不可用),这种现象称为阻塞效应。然而,目前尚不清楚阻断效应是否是绝对的,也不清楚阻断代词的句法重要性是否会影响阻断的强度。在本研究中,我们报告了两组离线和在线实验来检验与子鸡相关的阻断效应。通过对比实验1和实验2的强迫选择判断结果,我们发现句法突出的主语阻断者比客体阻断者产生更强的阻断效应,并且这种阻断效应的强度可以通过动词语义来调节。此外,在增量实时处理过程中,只有主题阻塞器引起阻塞,而对象阻塞器则没有。这些实验结果对阻塞效应的语言表述和句子加工模型都有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
62 weeks
期刊最新文献
Title Pending 10160 Title Pending 8932 Title Pending 8653 Title Pending 10229 Title Pending 9904
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1