{"title":"Developmental and evolutionary hypotheses for the origin of double fertilization and endosperm","authors":"William E Friedman","doi":"10.1016/S0764-4469(01)01326-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The discovery of a second fertilization event that initiates endosperm in flowering plants, just over a century ago, stimulated intense interest in the evolutionary history and homology of endosperm, the genetically biparental embryo-nourishing tissue that is found only in angiosperms. Two alternative hypotheses for the origin of double fertilization and endosperm have been invoked to explain the origin of the angiosperm reproductive syndrome from a typical non-flowering seed plant reproductive syndrome. Endosperm may have arisen from a developmental transformation of a supernumerary embryo derived from a rudimentary second fertilization event that first evolved in the ancestors of angiosperms (endosperm homologous with an embryo). Conversely, endosperm may represent the developmental transformation of the cellular phase of non-flowering seed plant female gametophyte ontogeny that was later sexualized by the addition of a second fertilization event in a strongly progenetic female gametophyte (endosperm homologous with a female gametophyte). For the first time, explicit developmental and evolutionary transitions for both of these hypotheses are examined and compared. In addition, current data that may be congruent with either of these hypotheses are discussed. It is clear that much remains to be accomplished if the evolutionary significance of the process of double fertilization and the formation of endosperm is to be fully understood.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100306,"journal":{"name":"Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie","volume":"324 6","pages":"Pages 559-567"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0764-4469(01)01326-9","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0764446901013269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56
Abstract
The discovery of a second fertilization event that initiates endosperm in flowering plants, just over a century ago, stimulated intense interest in the evolutionary history and homology of endosperm, the genetically biparental embryo-nourishing tissue that is found only in angiosperms. Two alternative hypotheses for the origin of double fertilization and endosperm have been invoked to explain the origin of the angiosperm reproductive syndrome from a typical non-flowering seed plant reproductive syndrome. Endosperm may have arisen from a developmental transformation of a supernumerary embryo derived from a rudimentary second fertilization event that first evolved in the ancestors of angiosperms (endosperm homologous with an embryo). Conversely, endosperm may represent the developmental transformation of the cellular phase of non-flowering seed plant female gametophyte ontogeny that was later sexualized by the addition of a second fertilization event in a strongly progenetic female gametophyte (endosperm homologous with a female gametophyte). For the first time, explicit developmental and evolutionary transitions for both of these hypotheses are examined and compared. In addition, current data that may be congruent with either of these hypotheses are discussed. It is clear that much remains to be accomplished if the evolutionary significance of the process of double fertilization and the formation of endosperm is to be fully understood.