Occurrence of FOX AmpC gene among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in abattoir samples from south-eastern Nigeria

C. Ejikeugwu, S. O. Hasson, R. M. Al-Mosawi, Miaad K Alkhudhairy, M. Saki, C. Ezeador, Peter M Eze, M. Ugwu, C. Duru, N. Ujam, C. Edeh, O. Udu-ibiam, I. Iroha, A. Michael
{"title":"Occurrence of FOX AmpC gene among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in abattoir samples from south-eastern Nigeria","authors":"C. Ejikeugwu, S. O. Hasson, R. M. Al-Mosawi, Miaad K Alkhudhairy, M. Saki, C. Ezeador, Peter M Eze, M. Ugwu, C. Duru, N. Ujam, C. Edeh, O. Udu-ibiam, I. Iroha, A. Michael","doi":"10.1097/MRM.0000000000000201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ISSN In Nigeria, several investigations have been done about the prevalence of the AmpC enzyme in clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacteria; however, little information is available on the occurrence rate of this important enzyme in abattoir specimens that play a major role in the environmental pollution in Nigeria. This study aimed to evaluate the presence of FOX AmpC-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from abattoir samples by both phenotypic method and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In this study, 360 abattoir samples were analyzed for the isolation of P. aeruginosa strains. Antibiogram was carried out using the disk diffusion technique. The production of AmpC enzymes was phenotypically screened and confirmed using the cefoxitin–cloxacillin double-disk synergy test (CC-DDST). Finally, gene responsible for FOX AmpC enzyme production was investigated using PCR. A total of 147 (40.8%) isolates of P. aeruginosa was recovered from the abattoir samples. Ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin with 45.6 and 19% of susceptibility rates were the most and the less effective antibiotics, respectively. A total of 24 (16.3%) P. aeruginosa isolates were confirmed to phenotypically produce AmpC enzyme. However, the PCR result showed that only three (12.5%) of P. aeruginosa isolates harbored the FOX AmpC gene suggesting the attendance of other AmpC resistance genes. This study reported the first occurrence of P. aeruginosa isolates harboring the FOX AmpC gene in abattoir samples from south-eastern Nigeria. This incident requires the adoption of new policies and measures to prevent the further spread of strains carrying the AmpC gene. Copyright 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":49625,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Medical Microbiology","volume":"os-7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRM.0000000000000201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ISSN In Nigeria, several investigations have been done about the prevalence of the AmpC enzyme in clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacteria; however, little information is available on the occurrence rate of this important enzyme in abattoir specimens that play a major role in the environmental pollution in Nigeria. This study aimed to evaluate the presence of FOX AmpC-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from abattoir samples by both phenotypic method and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In this study, 360 abattoir samples were analyzed for the isolation of P. aeruginosa strains. Antibiogram was carried out using the disk diffusion technique. The production of AmpC enzymes was phenotypically screened and confirmed using the cefoxitin–cloxacillin double-disk synergy test (CC-DDST). Finally, gene responsible for FOX AmpC enzyme production was investigated using PCR. A total of 147 (40.8%) isolates of P. aeruginosa was recovered from the abattoir samples. Ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin with 45.6 and 19% of susceptibility rates were the most and the less effective antibiotics, respectively. A total of 24 (16.3%) P. aeruginosa isolates were confirmed to phenotypically produce AmpC enzyme. However, the PCR result showed that only three (12.5%) of P. aeruginosa isolates harbored the FOX AmpC gene suggesting the attendance of other AmpC resistance genes. This study reported the first occurrence of P. aeruginosa isolates harboring the FOX AmpC gene in abattoir samples from south-eastern Nigeria. This incident requires the adoption of new policies and measures to prevent the further spread of strains carrying the AmpC gene. Copyright 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚东南部屠宰场样品中铜绿假单胞菌分离株FOX AmpC基因的出现
在尼日利亚,对临床分离的革兰氏阴性菌中AmpC酶的流行率进行了几项调查;然而,关于这种在尼日利亚环境污染中起主要作用的重要酶在屠宰场标本中的发生率的信息很少。本研究旨在通过表型法和聚合酶链反应(PCR)两种方法对屠宰场样品中FOX ampc产铜绿假单胞菌的存在性进行评价。本研究对360份屠宰场样品进行了分析,以分离铜绿假单胞菌。采用椎间盘扩散技术进行抗生素造影。AmpC酶的产生进行了表型筛选,并使用头孢西林-氯西林双盘协同试验(CC-DDST)进行了证实。最后,利用PCR技术对FOX AmpC产酶基因进行了分析。从屠宰场样品中检出铜绿假单胞菌147株(40.8%)。头孢他啶和环丙沙星的敏感性最高,分别为45.6%和19%。共有24株铜绿假单胞菌(16.3%)被证实表型上产生AmpC酶。然而,PCR结果显示,只有3株(12.5%)铜绿假单胞菌携带FOX AmpC基因,提示存在其他AmpC耐药基因。本研究报道了在尼日利亚东南部的屠宰场样本中首次发现携带FOX AmpC基因的铜绿假单胞菌分离株。这一事件要求采取新的政策和措施,防止携带AmpC基因的菌株进一步传播。威科集团版权所有版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in Medical Microbiology
Reviews in Medical Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in Medical Microbiology is a quarterly review journal which provides a balanced coverage of the whole field of medical microbiology. The Journal publishes state-of-the art reviews, mini-reviews, case presentations and original research from on-going research of the latest developments and techniques in medical microbiology, virology, mycology, parasitology, clinical microbiology, and hospital infection.​ In addition, PhD-Review - a platform for young researchers, and biographical Bio-Sketch articles are also considered. Reviews are concise, authoritative, and readable synthesis of the latest information on its subject, and references are limited to the fifty key sources for full reviews and twenty for mini-reviews. Reviews in Medical Microbiology is the perfect way for both qualified and trainee microbiologists, and researchers and clinicians with an interest in microbiology, to stay fully informed of the latest developments in medical microbiology. The journal is a valuable resource for educational and teaching purposes.
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of the immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 Reviews in Medical Microbiology become Reviews and Research in Medical Microbiology A review on antiviral efficacy of Bifidobacterium species Multifunctional dynamic toolbox A case of primary extragenital cutaneous gonorrhea involving the finger
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1