Maximum Entropy and Information Theory Approaches to Economics

Jason Smith
{"title":"Maximum Entropy and Information Theory Approaches to Economics","authors":"Jason Smith","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3094757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the natural sciences, complex non-linear systems composed of large numbers of smaller subunits provide an opportunity to apply the tools of statistical mechanics and information theory. The principle of maximum entropy can usually provide shortcuts in the treatment of these complex systems. However, there is an impasse to straightforward application to social and economic systems: the lack of well-defined constraints for Lagrange multipliers. This is typically treated in economics by introducing marginal utility as a Lagrange multiplier. \nJumping off from Gary Becker’s 1962 paper \"Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory\" — a maximum entropy argument in disguise — we introduce Peter Fielitz and Guenter Borchardt’s concept of \"information equilibrium\" presented in arXiv:0905.0610v4 [physics.gen-ph] as a means of applying maximum entropy methods even in cases where well-defined constraints such as energy conservation required to define Lagrange multipliers and partition functions are not obvious (i.e. economics). From these initial steps we are able to motivate a well-defined constraint in terms of growth rates and develop a formalism for ensembles of markets described by information equilibrium conditions. We apply information equilibrium to a description of the US unemployment rate, connect it to search and matching theory, and empirical regularities such as Okun’s Law. This represents a step toward Lee Smolin’s call for a \"statistical economics\" analogous to statistical mechanics in arXiv:0902.4274 [q-fin.GN].","PeriodicalId":11754,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3094757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the natural sciences, complex non-linear systems composed of large numbers of smaller subunits provide an opportunity to apply the tools of statistical mechanics and information theory. The principle of maximum entropy can usually provide shortcuts in the treatment of these complex systems. However, there is an impasse to straightforward application to social and economic systems: the lack of well-defined constraints for Lagrange multipliers. This is typically treated in economics by introducing marginal utility as a Lagrange multiplier. Jumping off from Gary Becker’s 1962 paper "Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory" — a maximum entropy argument in disguise — we introduce Peter Fielitz and Guenter Borchardt’s concept of "information equilibrium" presented in arXiv:0905.0610v4 [physics.gen-ph] as a means of applying maximum entropy methods even in cases where well-defined constraints such as energy conservation required to define Lagrange multipliers and partition functions are not obvious (i.e. economics). From these initial steps we are able to motivate a well-defined constraint in terms of growth rates and develop a formalism for ensembles of markets described by information equilibrium conditions. We apply information equilibrium to a description of the US unemployment rate, connect it to search and matching theory, and empirical regularities such as Okun’s Law. This represents a step toward Lee Smolin’s call for a "statistical economics" analogous to statistical mechanics in arXiv:0902.4274 [q-fin.GN].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济学的最大熵和信息理论方法
在自然科学中,由大量较小的亚单位组成的复杂非线性系统为应用统计力学和信息论的工具提供了机会。最大熵原理通常可以为处理这些复杂系统提供捷径。然而,将拉格朗日乘数直接应用到社会和经济系统中存在一个僵局:缺乏明确定义的拉格朗日乘数约束。这在经济学中通常是通过引入边际效用作为拉格朗日乘数来处理的。我们从Gary Becker 1962年的论文“非理性行为和经济理论”——一个伪装的最大熵论证——开始,介绍Peter Fielitz和Guenter Borchardt在arXiv:0905.0610v4[物理学]上提出的“信息均衡”概念。作为一种应用最大熵方法的手段,即使在定义拉格朗日乘子和配分函数所需的明确约束(即经济)不明显的情况下也是如此。从这些最初的步骤中,我们能够激发一个明确定义的增长率约束,并开发一个由信息均衡条件描述的市场集合的形式主义。我们将信息均衡应用于对美国失业率的描述,将其与搜索和匹配理论以及奥肯定律等经验规律联系起来。这代表着李·斯莫林(Lee Smolin)在arXiv:0902.4274 [q-fin.GN]中提出的类似于统计力学的“统计经济学”的呼吁向前迈进了一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic Hysteresis and its Modeling Credit Horizons Estimation of Heuristic Switching in Behavioral Macroeconomic Models Coupled Climate-Economy-Ecology (CoCEB) Modeling: A Dynamic Approach Post Keynesian Economics Is Based on Joan Robinson’s Many Canards About Supposed Gaping Holes in Keynes’s Theory: The Real Problem Is Gaping Holes and Gross Ignorance in the Post Keynesian Understanding of Keynes’s a Treatise on Probability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1