Tres razones de la metamorfosis de las ciencias sociales en el siglo XXI

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY Cinta de Moebio Pub Date : 2019-04-22 DOI:10.4067/S0717-554X2019000100114
C. Maldonado
{"title":"Tres razones de la metamorfosis de las ciencias sociales en el siglo XXI","authors":"C. Maldonado","doi":"10.4067/S0717-554X2019000100114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen: Este articulo explica la complejizacion de las ciencias sociales en el curso del siglo XXI, y aporta tres razones por las que este proceso ha tenido lugar. La tesis que se defiende aqui es que las ciencias sociales sufren una metamorfosis radical que deben asumir si quieren seguir existiendo. Aunque nada obliga a que tengan que seguir existiendo. Al final, en unas concusiones abiertas, se senala como, como consecuencia de las transformaciones en crisis, emerge una ciencia de lo imposible. EnglishAbstract: This paper explains the process of complexification of the social sciences during the end of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st century, while it provides three reasons why this has happened. The paper claims that the human and social sciences must undergo a radical metamorphosis if they want to keep alive at all. Even though, nothing obliges that these sciences must go on existing. At the end, as an open-ended conclusion, it is pointed out how, because of the changes that express a deep crisis, how a brand-new science of the impossible has emerged.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cinta de Moebio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2019000100114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

espanolResumen: Este articulo explica la complejizacion de las ciencias sociales en el curso del siglo XXI, y aporta tres razones por las que este proceso ha tenido lugar. La tesis que se defiende aqui es que las ciencias sociales sufren una metamorfosis radical que deben asumir si quieren seguir existiendo. Aunque nada obliga a que tengan que seguir existiendo. Al final, en unas concusiones abiertas, se senala como, como consecuencia de las transformaciones en crisis, emerge una ciencia de lo imposible. EnglishAbstract: This paper explains the process of complexification of the social sciences during the end of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st century, while it provides three reasons why this has happened. The paper claims that the human and social sciences must undergo a radical metamorphosis if they want to keep alive at all. Even though, nothing obliges that these sciences must go on existing. At the end, as an open-ended conclusion, it is pointed out how, because of the changes that express a deep crisis, how a brand-new science of the impossible has emerged.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
21世纪社会科学蜕变的三个原因
摘要:本文解释了21世纪社会科学的复杂性,并给出了这一过程发生的三个原因。这里的论点是,社会科学要想继续存在,就必须经历一场彻底的蜕变。然而,没有什么能迫使它们继续存在。最后,在公开辩论中,它指出,作为危机转变的结果,一门不可能的科学正在出现。英语stract:本文解释了20世纪末和21世纪初社会科学复杂性的过程,同时给出了发生这种情况的三个原因。The paper claims that The human and social sciences)必须undergo a radical metamorphosis if they want to keep alive at all。虽然,什么obliges这些科学必须go on existing。最后,作为一个开放式的结论,它指出,由于变化表达了一场深刻的危机,一门全新的不可能科学是如何出现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cinta de Moebio
Cinta de Moebio PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Cinta de Moebio publishes scientific articles and essays on epistemology of social science. The editorial experience of the magazine indicates that some academics send articles of philosophy, but of issues that are not related to the social sciences, as well as academics who sent the results of their research or projects in the social sciences, but its focus is not epistemology, which also are geared out to the purpose of the journal. The journal, put it in some way, it is in the dialogue of philosophy with social science and, therefore, both domains must be present in the articles.
期刊最新文献
Intervención en lo social y filosofía del contagio Una defensa restringida a la teoría de las preferencias reveladas Desacuerdos profundos, desacuerdos gratuitos y el riesgo de la postverdad A systemic problem cannot be solved systemically Describir y reflexionar: sobre las autodescripciones de la sociedad en la teoría de Niklas Luhmann
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1