Studies on the Immunosuppressive Effects of Anti-thymic and Anti-bursal Lymphocyte Sera

K. Ohkuma
{"title":"Studies on the Immunosuppressive Effects of Anti-thymic and Anti-bursal Lymphocyte Sera","authors":"K. Ohkuma","doi":"10.3412/JSB.25.305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rabbit anti-thymic and anti-bursal lymphocyte sera (hereafter abbreviated to RATLS and RABLS, respectively) were examined for immunosuppressive effect on the hemolytic plaque-forming cells (PFC) and rosette-forming cells (RFC) in the spleen, and on experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) in chickens. The results obtained are as follows:1) RATLS anb RABLS had a high lymphoagglutinating activity on the thymic and bursal lymphocytes, respectively. In addition, a cross-reaction was observed between both anti-lymphocyte sera. This suggests that the thymic and bursal lymphocytes may have common antigen(s) in addition to the respective specific antigen(s) on the surface of the cell.2) Repeated administration of RATLS caused a more remarkable fall in lymphocyte count of the peripheral blood than that of RABLS. Furthermore, severe depletion of lymphocytes in the white pulp of the spleen was a characteristic change caused by RATLS, and a slight decrease in lymphocytes and pyroninophilic cells and the appearance of ill-defined germinal centers were ones induced by RABLS.3) In the primary response, when RABLS was injected daily for five days following the sensitization with sheep erythrocytes, there was a marked decrease in the number of PFC and RFC in the spleen. In contrast, such a suppression by RABLS was not so marked in the secondary response in previously immunized birds. On the other hand, RATLS was found to have a weak suppressive effect only in the primary response.4) The occurrence of EAE and the delayed-type hypersensitivity (wattle test) to the encephalitogenic basic protein of myelin were suppressed remarkably by the repeated injection of RATLS, but much less remarkably by the repeated administration of RABLS.From the findings obtained, it was ascertained that RATLS exerted a suppressive effect selectively on the cell-mediated immune reaction, and that RABLS did such an effect on the humoral antibody production. Therefore, both anti-lymphocyte sera were proved to have a considerably high selective activity in their immunosuppression.","PeriodicalId":14812,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of bacteriology","volume":"29 1","pages":"305-315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of bacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3412/JSB.25.305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Rabbit anti-thymic and anti-bursal lymphocyte sera (hereafter abbreviated to RATLS and RABLS, respectively) were examined for immunosuppressive effect on the hemolytic plaque-forming cells (PFC) and rosette-forming cells (RFC) in the spleen, and on experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) in chickens. The results obtained are as follows:1) RATLS anb RABLS had a high lymphoagglutinating activity on the thymic and bursal lymphocytes, respectively. In addition, a cross-reaction was observed between both anti-lymphocyte sera. This suggests that the thymic and bursal lymphocytes may have common antigen(s) in addition to the respective specific antigen(s) on the surface of the cell.2) Repeated administration of RATLS caused a more remarkable fall in lymphocyte count of the peripheral blood than that of RABLS. Furthermore, severe depletion of lymphocytes in the white pulp of the spleen was a characteristic change caused by RATLS, and a slight decrease in lymphocytes and pyroninophilic cells and the appearance of ill-defined germinal centers were ones induced by RABLS.3) In the primary response, when RABLS was injected daily for five days following the sensitization with sheep erythrocytes, there was a marked decrease in the number of PFC and RFC in the spleen. In contrast, such a suppression by RABLS was not so marked in the secondary response in previously immunized birds. On the other hand, RATLS was found to have a weak suppressive effect only in the primary response.4) The occurrence of EAE and the delayed-type hypersensitivity (wattle test) to the encephalitogenic basic protein of myelin were suppressed remarkably by the repeated injection of RATLS, but much less remarkably by the repeated administration of RABLS.From the findings obtained, it was ascertained that RATLS exerted a suppressive effect selectively on the cell-mediated immune reaction, and that RABLS did such an effect on the humoral antibody production. Therefore, both anti-lymphocyte sera were proved to have a considerably high selective activity in their immunosuppression.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗胸腺和抗法氏囊淋巴细胞血清免疫抑制作用的研究
研究兔抗胸腺和抗法氏囊淋巴细胞血清(以下分别简称RATLS和RABLS)对脾脏溶血性斑块形成细胞(PFC)和玫瑰花形成细胞(RFC)以及鸡实验性变应性脑脊髓炎(EAE)的免疫抑制作用。结果表明:1)RATLS和RABLS分别对胸腺淋巴细胞和法氏囊淋巴细胞具有较高的淋巴凝集活性。此外,两种抗淋巴细胞血清之间存在交叉反应。这表明胸腺淋巴细胞和法氏囊淋巴细胞除了在细胞表面有各自的特异性抗原外,可能有共同抗原。2)与RABLS相比,反复给药引起外周血淋巴细胞计数的下降更为显著。此外,脾脏白髓淋巴细胞的严重耗损是RATLS引起的特征性变化,淋巴细胞和嗜热性细胞的轻微减少和生发中心的模糊出现是RABLS引起的。3)在初次反应中,绵羊红细胞致敏后连续5天每天注射RABLS,脾脏中PFC和RFC的数量明显减少。相比之下,RABLS的这种抑制作用在先前免疫过的鸟类的二次反应中并不明显。4)反复注射RATLS可显著抑制EAE的发生和对脑源性髓鞘碱性蛋白的迟发性超敏反应(wattle试验),而反复给药RABLS则不显著。从所获得的结果可以确定RATLS对细胞介导的免疫反应有选择性的抑制作用,并且RABLS对体液抗体的产生有这种作用。因此,这两种抗淋巴细胞血清具有相当高的免疫抑制选择性活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In memoriam of Dr. Yoshiro Terawaki Typings of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from patients of 2 outbreak cases by genotypic and phenotypic methods ベロ毒素産生 Escherichia coli O157:H7に対する Bicozamycin の抗菌作用 内毒素の活性中心(リピドA)の研究 Campylobacter infection in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1