Effectiveness of modified arthroscopic treatment of patients with epicondylitis of the humerus

Q3 Medicine Genij Ortopedii Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-3-235-243
A. Midaev, M. Salihov, N. Fomin
{"title":"Effectiveness of modified arthroscopic treatment of patients with epicondylitis of the humerus","authors":"A. Midaev, M. Salihov, N. Fomin","doi":"10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-3-235-243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background One of the most common reasons of patients’ visits with complaints in the area of the elbow joint is epicondylitis of the elbow joint. Surgical treatment is recommended if conservative treatment fails after 6-12 months. Arthroscopy of the elbow joint is one of the current surgical methods of minimally invasive interventions on the elbow joint. Purpose To conduct a comparative assessment of the effectiveness of treating epicondylitis of the elbow joint using modified arthroscopic and open techniques Methods A prospective cohort-controlled study was performed on 120 patients. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 – patients operated on by the open method (control), group 2 – patients operated on by the arthroscopic method. Additionally, depending on the nosology, the patients were divided into four subgroups. Functional results were assessed using VAS, DASH, MEPS; additionally, dynamometry was performed before surgery, and 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery. Results There is a significant improvement in the function of the elbow joint one month after surgical treatment, mainly in III and IV subgroups according to the MEPS scale, p = 0.0001. According to the VAS scale, a pronounced and persistent decrease in pain in the long-term period compared with the preoperative period was revealed in patients of the arthroscopic subgroup p = 0.0001. According to the DASH questionnaire, the functional results in patients of arthroscopic group in the postoperative period significantly exceeded over the open method p < 0.001. Discussion The use of the open surgical method provides good or excellent functional outcomes of treatment in 75-85 %. However, it has a number of disadvantages, including infectious complications and the inability of the surgeon to identify and completely remove the pathological altered tissues. The arthroscopic technique allows leveling these shortcomings and obtaining up to 95‑100 % excellent functional results. Conclusion Based on the data obtained in this study, the reatment of patients with epicondylitis of the distal humerus according to the developed arthroscopic technique significantly improves the functional state of patients, which, in turn, improves their quality of life.","PeriodicalId":37426,"journal":{"name":"Genij Ortopedii","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genij Ortopedii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-3-235-243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background One of the most common reasons of patients’ visits with complaints in the area of the elbow joint is epicondylitis of the elbow joint. Surgical treatment is recommended if conservative treatment fails after 6-12 months. Arthroscopy of the elbow joint is one of the current surgical methods of minimally invasive interventions on the elbow joint. Purpose To conduct a comparative assessment of the effectiveness of treating epicondylitis of the elbow joint using modified arthroscopic and open techniques Methods A prospective cohort-controlled study was performed on 120 patients. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 – patients operated on by the open method (control), group 2 – patients operated on by the arthroscopic method. Additionally, depending on the nosology, the patients were divided into four subgroups. Functional results were assessed using VAS, DASH, MEPS; additionally, dynamometry was performed before surgery, and 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery. Results There is a significant improvement in the function of the elbow joint one month after surgical treatment, mainly in III and IV subgroups according to the MEPS scale, p = 0.0001. According to the VAS scale, a pronounced and persistent decrease in pain in the long-term period compared with the preoperative period was revealed in patients of the arthroscopic subgroup p = 0.0001. According to the DASH questionnaire, the functional results in patients of arthroscopic group in the postoperative period significantly exceeded over the open method p < 0.001. Discussion The use of the open surgical method provides good or excellent functional outcomes of treatment in 75-85 %. However, it has a number of disadvantages, including infectious complications and the inability of the surgeon to identify and completely remove the pathological altered tissues. The arthroscopic technique allows leveling these shortcomings and obtaining up to 95‑100 % excellent functional results. Conclusion Based on the data obtained in this study, the reatment of patients with epicondylitis of the distal humerus according to the developed arthroscopic technique significantly improves the functional state of patients, which, in turn, improves their quality of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良关节镜治疗肱骨上髁炎的疗效观察
背景:肘关节上髁炎是患者就诊的最常见原因之一。如果保守治疗在6-12个月后失败,建议手术治疗。关节镜检查是目前肘关节微创干预的手术方法之一。目的比较改良关节镜与开放技术治疗肘关节上髁炎的疗效。方法对120例患者进行前瞻性队列对照研究。将患者分为两组:1组采用切开手术(对照组),2组采用关节镜下手术。此外,根据病种,患者被分为四个亚组。功能评分采用VAS、DASH、MEPS;此外,术前、术后1、3、12个月进行动力测量。结果术后1个月肘关节功能明显改善,MEPS评分以ⅲ、ⅳ亚组为主,p = 0.0001。根据VAS评分,与术前相比,关节镜亚组患者在长期内疼痛明显持续减轻p = 0.0001。根据DASH问卷,关节镜组术后患者的功能结果明显优于开腹法,p < 0.001。开放式手术方法的使用可提供75- 85%的良好或优异的治疗功能结果。然而,它有一些缺点,包括感染性并发症和外科医生无法识别和完全切除病理改变的组织。关节镜技术可以弥补这些缺点,并获得高达95 - 100%的优异功能结果。结论根据本研究获得的数据,根据已开发的关节镜技术治疗肱骨远端上髁炎患者,可显著改善患者的功能状态,从而提高患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genij Ortopedii
Genij Ortopedii Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal’s main goal is to contribute to the development of the contemporary medical science via presentation of fundamental and applied original scientific studies to the scientific and practical medical community that would widen and deepen the understanding of the most important problems in the field of traumatology, orthopaedics, and related specialties. Our journal provides a direct open access to its content which is based on the principle that the open access option promotes global exchange of knowledge and experience. Journal’s strategy: -Development of the journal as a scientific platform for researchers, doctors, post-graduates and residents -Attraction of highly-cited authors to publish their studies -Selection of manuscripts of scientific interest for readers that will impact on journal citation index in RINC -Increase in the portion of publications submitted by foreign authors and studies conducted in association with foreign scientists; growth of citations in the journals that are included into global systems of indexing and reputable databases -Improvement of the Journal’s web site in two languages for a greater accessibility by authors and readers -Introduction of the Journal into global indexing systems
期刊最新文献
Evolution of the first metatarsophalangeal joint replacement Orthopaedic complications of hemiparetic forms of cerebral palsy: problems of the lower extremities (literature review) Evolution of tactical approaches to eliminating limb length discrepancy Current state of the treatment problem in the patients with elbow joint contractures due to ossification Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae in children and adolescents (literature review, illustrated with clinical observations)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1