Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations: The need for excellence in regulatory toxicology

C. Berry
{"title":"Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations: The need for excellence in regulatory toxicology","authors":"C. Berry","doi":"10.1177/2397847320951377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following a number of published expressions of concern about the reliability of experimental science and the implications of non-reproducibility for regulatory toxicology, the European Risk Forum undertook to consider what practises might improve the basis on which regulatory decisions might be made. Guidelines which may be useful in assessments are presented. The document acknowledges the value of the experimental standards used in most regulatory studies but indicates how these may fail to provide the ‘best outcome’ and how imperfect studies based on outdated views of pathophysiology of disease in H. Sapiens may offer little of predictive value.","PeriodicalId":23155,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Research and Application","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Research and Application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2397847320951377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following a number of published expressions of concern about the reliability of experimental science and the implications of non-reproducibility for regulatory toxicology, the European Risk Forum undertook to consider what practises might improve the basis on which regulatory decisions might be made. Guidelines which may be useful in assessments are presented. The document acknowledges the value of the experimental standards used in most regulatory studies but indicates how these may fail to provide the ‘best outcome’ and how imperfect studies based on outdated views of pathophysiology of disease in H. Sapiens may offer little of predictive value.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监管评估中评估和数据整合的框架:监管毒理学中卓越的需要
在发表了一些关于实验科学的可靠性和不可再现性对管制毒理学的影响的关切之后,欧洲风险论坛承诺考虑哪些做法可能改善作出管制决定的基础。提出了在评估中可能有用的指导方针。该文件承认在大多数监管研究中使用的实验标准的价值,但指出这些可能无法提供“最佳结果”,以及基于过时的智人疾病病理生理学观点的不完善的研究可能提供很少的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predicted aerosol dosimetry for mouse models of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease and lung cancer Banana peel extract alleviate inflammation and oxidative stress via modulation of the Nrf2/Hmox-1 and NF-κB pathways in thyroid of heavy metal mixture exposed female rats Safety evaluation of oubli fruit sweet protein (brazzein) derived from Komagataella phaffii, intended for use as a sweetener in food and beverages A randomized, open-label, cross-over pilot study investigating metabolic product kinetics of the palatable novel ketone ester, bis-octanoyl (R)-1,3-butanediol, and bis-hexanoyl (R)-1,3-butanediol ingestion in healthy adults Assessment of level of heavy metals in cosmetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1