{"title":"Alexandre Benois and Denis Diderot","authors":"A. Zavyalova","doi":"10.21638/spbu15.2023.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is the first to consider the influence of the views of Denis Diderot (“Salons”) on the works of Alexandre Benois — as an art historian, first of all — on his “The History of painting of all times and peoples”. As a result of a comparative analysis of the texts by two authors, it was established that both Benois and Diderot paid the greatest attention to the works of J. B. S. Chardin, F. Boucher, C. (Sh. A.) Vanloo, J.-B. Greuze, J.Robert. It has also been established that Benois described the art of Chardin and Boucher practically in the words of Diderot. The source study analysis of Benois’s article “The Collection of Drawings by Stepan Yaremich”, as well as Benois’s “Art letters” of different years, made it possible to find out his own attitude to Busher. The source study analysis of Benois’s memoirs “My Memories” and the work of R. Muther “The History of Painting in the 19th Century” made it possible to find out the source of Benois’s negative assessment of narrative and edifying in the art of Dreams — precisely those qualities that Diderot especially appreciated in the works of this artist. Comparative analysis of the text of Benois’s article “On Narrative in Painting”, his work “History of Russian Painting in the 19th Century” with the text of “Salons” by Diderot made it possible to find out that Benois used at the beginning of his activity the Diderot’s method of an expanded description.","PeriodicalId":40378,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Iskusstvovedenie","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Iskusstvovedenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2023.204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article is the first to consider the influence of the views of Denis Diderot (“Salons”) on the works of Alexandre Benois — as an art historian, first of all — on his “The History of painting of all times and peoples”. As a result of a comparative analysis of the texts by two authors, it was established that both Benois and Diderot paid the greatest attention to the works of J. B. S. Chardin, F. Boucher, C. (Sh. A.) Vanloo, J.-B. Greuze, J.Robert. It has also been established that Benois described the art of Chardin and Boucher practically in the words of Diderot. The source study analysis of Benois’s article “The Collection of Drawings by Stepan Yaremich”, as well as Benois’s “Art letters” of different years, made it possible to find out his own attitude to Busher. The source study analysis of Benois’s memoirs “My Memories” and the work of R. Muther “The History of Painting in the 19th Century” made it possible to find out the source of Benois’s negative assessment of narrative and edifying in the art of Dreams — precisely those qualities that Diderot especially appreciated in the works of this artist. Comparative analysis of the text of Benois’s article “On Narrative in Painting”, his work “History of Russian Painting in the 19th Century” with the text of “Salons” by Diderot made it possible to find out that Benois used at the beginning of his activity the Diderot’s method of an expanded description.
这篇文章首先考虑了丹尼斯·狄德罗(“沙龙”)的观点对亚历山大·贝努瓦的作品的影响——作为一个艺术史学家,首先是对他的“所有时代和民族的绘画史”的影响。通过对两位作者的文本进行比较分析,可以确定贝努瓦和狄德罗对查尔丹、鲍彻、C. (Sh. a .)的作品最为关注。Vanloo J.-B。Greuze J.Robert。贝努瓦实际上是在用狄德罗的话来描述夏尔丹和布歇的艺术。通过对Benois的文章《The Collection of Drawings by Stepan Yaremich》的来源研究分析,以及Benois不同年份的“Art letters”,可以发现他自己对Busher的态度。通过对贝努瓦的回忆录《我的回忆》和R. Muther的作品《19世纪绘画史》的源性研究分析,我们可以找到贝努瓦对梦的艺术中叙事和教化的负面评价的来源,而这些恰恰是狄狄罗在这位艺术家的作品中特别欣赏的品质。将贝努瓦的文章《论绘画中的叙事》、他的作品《19世纪俄罗斯绘画史》与狄德罗的作品《沙龙》的文本进行对比分析,可以发现贝努瓦在活动之初就采用了狄德罗的扩展描述方法。