You Can't Betray a Fish: One Reason Eating Fish May Cause Less Harm Than Eating Cows

Ronald G. Oldfield
{"title":"You Can't Betray a Fish: One Reason Eating Fish May Cause Less Harm Than Eating Cows","authors":"Ronald G. Oldfield","doi":"10.5406/21601267.12.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In The Ultimate Betrayal: Is There Happy Meat?, Bohanec (2013) proposed that farmed animals raised humanely may experience betrayal when slaughtered. I argue based on personal experience that humans often betray trust relationships with farmed animals. Using published scientific literature, I find that typical farmed animals (mammals) and farmed fishes are both cognitively capable of a rudimentary experience of betrayal. However, the manner in which fishes are typically maintained does not present opportunities for human-fish trust relationships to develop. Eating farmed fishes presents fewer ethical implications than eating cows, at least in some cases.","PeriodicalId":73601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","volume":"15 1","pages":"51 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.12.1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:In The Ultimate Betrayal: Is There Happy Meat?, Bohanec (2013) proposed that farmed animals raised humanely may experience betrayal when slaughtered. I argue based on personal experience that humans often betray trust relationships with farmed animals. Using published scientific literature, I find that typical farmed animals (mammals) and farmed fishes are both cognitively capable of a rudimentary experience of betrayal. However, the manner in which fishes are typically maintained does not present opportunities for human-fish trust relationships to develop. Eating farmed fishes presents fewer ethical implications than eating cows, at least in some cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你不能背叛鱼:吃鱼比吃牛危害小的一个原因
摘要:《终极背叛:有快乐的肉吗?》Bohanec(2013)提出,人道饲养的养殖动物在被屠宰时可能会遭遇背叛。基于个人经验,我认为人类经常背叛与农场动物的信任关系。根据已发表的科学文献,我发现典型的养殖动物(哺乳动物)和养殖鱼类都具有背叛的基本认知能力。然而,鱼类的典型养护方式并没有为人类与鱼类之间的信任关系的发展提供机会。至少在某些情况下,吃人工养殖的鱼比吃牛更少涉及伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phenomenology and Critical Hermeneutics of the “Livestock” Industry and Associated Sanctuaries Neglected Tropical Diseases and Long-Term Captive Animals: Ethical Considerations with Venom Lab Snakes Quality Management and Animal Welfare as Culture of Care for Animal Experiments under Biosafety Level-3, taking COVID-19 as a Practical Example Rejecting an Additive Solution to Regan’s Lifeboat Case Zoonoses in Unconventional Companion Animals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1