SENSITIVITY OF PATHOGENIC AND OPPORTUNISTIC MICROORGANISMS TO PROBIOTIC STRAINS IN THE LIGHT OF PERSONALIZED PROBIOTIC THERAPY

T. Suranova
{"title":"SENSITIVITY OF PATHOGENIC AND OPPORTUNISTIC MICROORGANISMS TO PROBIOTIC STRAINS IN THE LIGHT OF PERSONALIZED PROBIOTIC THERAPY","authors":"T. Suranova","doi":"10.17816/eid117545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study. To study the sensitivity of clinical strains of pathogenic and opportunistic bacteria and fungi to microorganisms that are part of probiotic preparations. Materials and methods. The sensitivity of 93 cultures of pathogenic and opportunistic microorganisms (UPM) isolated from the feces of patients with intestinal dysbiosis to strains of probiotic bacteria isolated from commercial probiotic preparations was studied: L. plantarum 8RA-3, E. coli M-17, B. subtilis strain VKPM B-10641, E. faecium SF-68, S. boulardii CNCM I-745 by delayed antagonism method. Results. It was found that pathogenic microorganisms showed low and moderate sensitivity to the probiotic strain of L. plantarum. Sensitivity to the probiotic strain of B. subtilis was detected in S. aureus strains, low or completely absent in P. aeruginosa, Klebsiella spp., S. marcescens. The most sensitive to the probiotic strain were clinical strains of E. coli. Conclusion. UPM and pathogenic microorganisms isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of patients with dysbiosis have different sensitivity to probiotic strains: from high to several probiotics to its complete absence. The empirical approach in prescribing a probiotic does not guarantee a therapeutic effect, which makes it expedient to personify the selection of a probiotic based on an assessment of its antimicrobial activity against isolated pathogens.","PeriodicalId":93465,"journal":{"name":"Journal of infectious diseases and epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of infectious diseases and epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/eid117545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study. To study the sensitivity of clinical strains of pathogenic and opportunistic bacteria and fungi to microorganisms that are part of probiotic preparations. Materials and methods. The sensitivity of 93 cultures of pathogenic and opportunistic microorganisms (UPM) isolated from the feces of patients with intestinal dysbiosis to strains of probiotic bacteria isolated from commercial probiotic preparations was studied: L. plantarum 8RA-3, E. coli M-17, B. subtilis strain VKPM B-10641, E. faecium SF-68, S. boulardii CNCM I-745 by delayed antagonism method. Results. It was found that pathogenic microorganisms showed low and moderate sensitivity to the probiotic strain of L. plantarum. Sensitivity to the probiotic strain of B. subtilis was detected in S. aureus strains, low or completely absent in P. aeruginosa, Klebsiella spp., S. marcescens. The most sensitive to the probiotic strain were clinical strains of E. coli. Conclusion. UPM and pathogenic microorganisms isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of patients with dysbiosis have different sensitivity to probiotic strains: from high to several probiotics to its complete absence. The empirical approach in prescribing a probiotic does not guarantee a therapeutic effect, which makes it expedient to personify the selection of a probiotic based on an assessment of its antimicrobial activity against isolated pathogens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于个性化益生菌治疗的致病性和机会性微生物对益生菌菌株的敏感性
研究的目的。目的:研究致病菌、机会性细菌和真菌临床菌株对益生菌制剂中微生物的敏感性。材料和方法。采用延迟拮抗法,研究了从肠道失调患者粪便中分离的93株病原菌和条件微生物(UPM)对商业益生菌制剂中分离的植物乳杆菌8RA-3、大肠杆菌M-17、枯草芽孢杆菌VKPM B-10641、大肠杆菌f -68、博氏杆菌CNCM I-745的敏感性。结果。结果表明,病原菌对植物乳杆菌的敏感性为低、中度。金黄色葡萄球菌对枯草芽孢杆菌的敏感性较高,铜绿假单胞菌、克雷伯菌、粘质葡萄球菌对枯草芽孢杆菌的敏感性较低或完全不存在。对该菌最敏感的是临床菌株大肠杆菌。结论。从生态失调患者胃肠道中分离的UPM和致病微生物对益生菌菌株的敏感性不同:从高到几种益生菌到完全没有益生菌。处方益生菌的经验方法并不能保证治疗效果,这使得根据对分离病原体的抗菌活性评估来拟人化益生菌的选择是权宜之计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Seropositivity of Anti-CMV IgM Antibody among Women of Child-Bearing Age Attending Selected Hospitals in Kaduna State, Nigeria Knowledge, Attitude and Risk Factors of Acquiring Leptospirosis and Other Rodent-Borne Diseases in Kibondo and Kakonko Districts, Kigoma, Tanzania Variability of Hepatitis B Genotypes among HIV Infected Individuals in Kenya Antimalarial Health Seekers' Preferences and Perceptions: Insights from Ghana Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Survey on Protective Behavioral Practices against Coronavirus Disease 2019 among Health Workers in Sierra Leone, 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1