Visual Perception Evaluation with Semantic Differentiation Technique in Design Disciplines: Elazig Balakgazi Park

Q2 Arts and Humanities In Monte Artium Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI:10.51664/artium.1170754
Müge ÜNAL ÇİLEK
{"title":"Visual Perception Evaluation with Semantic Differentiation Technique in Design Disciplines: Elazig Balakgazi Park","authors":"Müge ÜNAL ÇİLEK","doi":"10.51664/artium.1170754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Visual perception studies in the public space are important in improving and developing any space’s design features. This study aims to evaluate landscape architects’ and architects’ visual perception of Balakgazi park design in the city of Elazig. Study methodology consists of four stages: (1) Determining the adjective pairs related to the feelings of pleasure, excitement, and dominance that are effective in evaluating the design; (2) Preparation of visual perception questionnaires; (3) Determination of visual perceptions with semantic differentiation technique. At this stage, the determined 18 adjective pairs were rated by the participants according to the 7-point Likert scale (1=Negative, 7=Positive). (4) Statistical analysis of the obtained data. At this stage, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to group the predominant adjective pairs in participant perceptions. MANOVA was used to determine whether the factors changed according to the socio-demographic characteristics of participants (gender, age, education level, etc.). In this study, the responses of 207 participants, 107 of them landscape architects and 98 architects, were evaluated. The data obtained from both groups were evaluated separately. The main results show that “Uninteresting-Interesting” got the lowest score (2.74), and the highest score was “Complex-Simple” (4.67) in the adjective pairs in Balakgazi park by the landscape architects. On the other hand, in architects, “Insufficient Green-Green” (3.19) has the lowest value, while the highest score is “Complex-Simple” (4.48). Landscape architects generally negatively evaluated the adjective pairs. As a result of the EFA, the adjective pairs were grouped under two-factor groups: “Excitement” and “Pleasure and Dominance” according to landscape architects. On the other hand, architects determined two-factor groups: “Excitement and Dominance” and “Excitement”. MANOVA results show that while there was no statistical difference in the determination of the factor groups according to gender and whether participants had seen the Balakgazi park (p>0.05), there were differences in their responses according to their levels of design education (p","PeriodicalId":36572,"journal":{"name":"In Monte Artium","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Monte Artium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51664/artium.1170754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual perception studies in the public space are important in improving and developing any space’s design features. This study aims to evaluate landscape architects’ and architects’ visual perception of Balakgazi park design in the city of Elazig. Study methodology consists of four stages: (1) Determining the adjective pairs related to the feelings of pleasure, excitement, and dominance that are effective in evaluating the design; (2) Preparation of visual perception questionnaires; (3) Determination of visual perceptions with semantic differentiation technique. At this stage, the determined 18 adjective pairs were rated by the participants according to the 7-point Likert scale (1=Negative, 7=Positive). (4) Statistical analysis of the obtained data. At this stage, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to group the predominant adjective pairs in participant perceptions. MANOVA was used to determine whether the factors changed according to the socio-demographic characteristics of participants (gender, age, education level, etc.). In this study, the responses of 207 participants, 107 of them landscape architects and 98 architects, were evaluated. The data obtained from both groups were evaluated separately. The main results show that “Uninteresting-Interesting” got the lowest score (2.74), and the highest score was “Complex-Simple” (4.67) in the adjective pairs in Balakgazi park by the landscape architects. On the other hand, in architects, “Insufficient Green-Green” (3.19) has the lowest value, while the highest score is “Complex-Simple” (4.48). Landscape architects generally negatively evaluated the adjective pairs. As a result of the EFA, the adjective pairs were grouped under two-factor groups: “Excitement” and “Pleasure and Dominance” according to landscape architects. On the other hand, architects determined two-factor groups: “Excitement and Dominance” and “Excitement”. MANOVA results show that while there was no statistical difference in the determination of the factor groups according to gender and whether participants had seen the Balakgazi park (p>0.05), there were differences in their responses according to their levels of design education (p
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于语义分异技术的设计学科视觉感知评价:Elazig Balakgazi公园
公共空间的视觉感知研究对于改善和发展任何空间的设计特征都是非常重要的。本研究旨在评价景观设计师和建筑师对Elazig市Balakgazi公园设计的视觉感知。研究方法包括四个阶段:(1)确定与愉悦感、兴奋感和支配感相关的形容词对,有效地评价设计;(2)视觉感知问卷的编制;(3)利用语义区分技术确定视觉感知。在这一阶段,被试根据7分李克特量表(1=负,7=正)对确定的18对形容词进行评分。(4)对所得数据进行统计分析。在这一阶段,探索性因子分析(EFA)被用于分组的主要形容词对参与者的看法。采用多元方差分析(MANOVA)来确定这些因素是否会随着参与者的社会人口学特征(性别、年龄、教育水平等)而变化。在本研究中,对207名参与者的回答进行了评估,其中107名是景观设计师,98名是建筑师。分别对两组数据进行评价。主要结果显示,在Balakgazi公园的形容词对中,“无趣-有趣”得分最低(2.74分),“复杂-简单”得分最高(4.67分)。另一方面,在建筑师中,“Green-Green不足”得分最低(3.19分),而“Complex-Simple”得分最高(4.48分)。景观设计师通常对形容词对持负面评价。作为EFA的结果,根据景观设计师的说法,形容词组合被分为两个因素组:“兴奋”和“愉悦和支配”。另一方面,建筑师确定了两个因素组:“兴奋和支配”和“兴奋”。方差分析结果显示,虽然按性别和参与者是否见过Balakgazi公园确定的因素组没有统计学差异(p>0.05),但按设计教育水平确定的因素组存在差异(p>0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
In Monte Artium
In Monte Artium Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Ahşap Direkli Camilerin Koruma Sorunları: Kemah Örneği An Evaluation of Traditional Ventilation Chimney Terminology Enformel Bir Konut Çevresinin Çocukların Aktif Kamusal Katılımı Açısından İncelenmesi Understanding Housing in Collective Life: Diyarbakır Ardahan Kalesi Koruma Sorunları ve Çözüm Önerileri
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1