Interpreting the preliminary outcomes of the arrowsmith Programme: a neuroimaging and behavioural study

Q2 Social Sciences Learning: Research and Practice Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.1080/23735082.2019.1674908
Rachel C Weber, Ronan Denyer, Negin Motamed Yeganeh, Rachel A Maja, Meagan Murphy, Stephanie Martin, Larissa K. Chiu, Veronique Nguy, K. White, L. Boyd
{"title":"Interpreting the preliminary outcomes of the arrowsmith Programme: a neuroimaging and behavioural study","authors":"Rachel C Weber, Ronan Denyer, Negin Motamed Yeganeh, Rachel A Maja, Meagan Murphy, Stephanie Martin, Larissa K. Chiu, Veronique Nguy, K. White, L. Boyd","doi":"10.1080/23735082.2019.1674908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Learning disabilities are currently conceptualised as involving underlying weaknesses in cognitive processing, which has prompted growing interest in cognitive interventions that may alleviate learning challenges. One such programme , the Arrowsmith programme, targets a broad array of cognitive domains, but has not been evaluated. This study evaluated the cognitive and academic growth of students who participated in one academic year of the Arrowsmith programme and examined whether baseline MRI-derived myelin water fraction (MWF) and cognitive abilities were correlated with intervention outcomes. Participants demonstrated overall cognitive and academic growth as well as individual areas in which they improved after one year. Some areas of cognitive and academic growth were significantly correlated, suggesting a relationship in skill improvement. Baseline MWF and cognitive processing were related to higher or lower degrees of skill improvement in some areas. These results suggest that the Arrowsmith programme may be associated with improvements in cognitive and academic skills. In addition, they reflect the importance of considering individual characteristics at baseline when evaluating intervention outcomes.","PeriodicalId":52244,"journal":{"name":"Learning: Research and Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":"126 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning: Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2019.1674908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Learning disabilities are currently conceptualised as involving underlying weaknesses in cognitive processing, which has prompted growing interest in cognitive interventions that may alleviate learning challenges. One such programme , the Arrowsmith programme, targets a broad array of cognitive domains, but has not been evaluated. This study evaluated the cognitive and academic growth of students who participated in one academic year of the Arrowsmith programme and examined whether baseline MRI-derived myelin water fraction (MWF) and cognitive abilities were correlated with intervention outcomes. Participants demonstrated overall cognitive and academic growth as well as individual areas in which they improved after one year. Some areas of cognitive and academic growth were significantly correlated, suggesting a relationship in skill improvement. Baseline MWF and cognitive processing were related to higher or lower degrees of skill improvement in some areas. These results suggest that the Arrowsmith programme may be associated with improvements in cognitive and academic skills. In addition, they reflect the importance of considering individual characteristics at baseline when evaluating intervention outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解释箭匠计划的初步结果:一项神经成像和行为研究
学习障碍目前被定义为涉及认知加工的潜在弱点,这促使人们对可能减轻学习挑战的认知干预越来越感兴趣。其中一个项目,阿罗史密斯项目,针对一系列广泛的认知领域,但尚未得到评估。本研究评估了参加一学年Arrowsmith项目的学生的认知和学业增长,并检查了基线mri衍生髓磷脂水分数(MWF)和认知能力是否与干预结果相关。一年后,参与者表现出整体的认知和学术增长,以及个人领域的进步。认知和学术发展的一些领域显著相关,这表明在技能提高方面存在关系。基线MWF和认知加工在某些领域与较高或较低程度的技能提高有关。这些结果表明,阿罗史密斯计划可能与认知和学术技能的提高有关。此外,它们反映了在评估干预结果时考虑基线个体特征的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning: Research and Practice
Learning: Research and Practice Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Speak like a pro: boosting language proficiency, engagement, and reducing anxiety, in virtual reality through innovative media transition with MondlyVR and VirtualSpeech Promoting pre-service teacher development through intervention-based action research Better learning and practice with teacher corrective feedback in higher education: a lesson from Thailand Factors influencing undergraduate students’ engagement in online learning: a PLS-SEM approach Learning journal 2.0: refinements for greater heights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1