Deliberate hypotensive anesthesia during maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study between dexmedetomidine and sodium nitroprusside

Rehab S El-Kalla, M. E. El Mourad
{"title":"Deliberate hypotensive anesthesia during maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study between dexmedetomidine and sodium nitroprusside","authors":"Rehab S El-Kalla, M. E. El Mourad","doi":"10.4103/1687-7934.182226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The aim of the present study was to evaluate the anesthetic properties such as the onset of required hypotension, the quality of the surgical field, the percentage of inhaled anesthesia, intraoperative consumption of fentanyl, time to recovery, and adverse events of dexmedetomidine (DEX) as a hypotensive agent in comparison with sodium nitroprusside (SNP) in maxillofacial surgery. Patients and methods A total of 70 ASA I or II patients, aged 20-60 years, scheduled for maxillofacial surgery were randomly assigned to receive either DEX 1 mg/kg before induction of anesthesia for over 10 min followed by 0.2-0.5 mg/kg/h infusion during maintenance (DEX group; n = 35 patients) or SNP 0.25 mg/kg/min infusion after induction of anesthesia (SNP group; n = 35 patients) to maintain mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) between 50 and 65 mmHg. Hemodynamic variables and end-tidal isoflurane concentration were recorded, quality of surgical field was assessed by the same surgeon who was blinded of the selected hypotensive agent, and intraoperative fentanyl consumption and recovery time were recorded. Results Heart rate was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in DEX group. Both drugs were effective in achieving the desired level of hypotension (MAP: 50-65 mmHg). However, the time needed to reach the target MAP was significantly shorter in the SNP group than in the DEX group. End-tidal isoflurane concentration and intraoperative fentanyl consumption were significantly lower in the DEX group than in the SNP group, and the quality of the surgical field was better in the DEX group compared with the SNP group, but the time for recovery was significantly longer in the DEX group than in the SNP group. Conclusion We concluded that DEX is an effective and safe agent with anesthetic benefits for controlled hypotension, and that compared with SNP DEX offers the advantage of better quality of the surgical field and decreased anesthetic and fentanyl requirements intraoperatively. However, DEX was associated with significantly longer time to reach the target MAP and delayed recovery from anesthesia compared with SNP.","PeriodicalId":7492,"journal":{"name":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":"20 1","pages":"201 - 206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1687-7934.182226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background The aim of the present study was to evaluate the anesthetic properties such as the onset of required hypotension, the quality of the surgical field, the percentage of inhaled anesthesia, intraoperative consumption of fentanyl, time to recovery, and adverse events of dexmedetomidine (DEX) as a hypotensive agent in comparison with sodium nitroprusside (SNP) in maxillofacial surgery. Patients and methods A total of 70 ASA I or II patients, aged 20-60 years, scheduled for maxillofacial surgery were randomly assigned to receive either DEX 1 mg/kg before induction of anesthesia for over 10 min followed by 0.2-0.5 mg/kg/h infusion during maintenance (DEX group; n = 35 patients) or SNP 0.25 mg/kg/min infusion after induction of anesthesia (SNP group; n = 35 patients) to maintain mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) between 50 and 65 mmHg. Hemodynamic variables and end-tidal isoflurane concentration were recorded, quality of surgical field was assessed by the same surgeon who was blinded of the selected hypotensive agent, and intraoperative fentanyl consumption and recovery time were recorded. Results Heart rate was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in DEX group. Both drugs were effective in achieving the desired level of hypotension (MAP: 50-65 mmHg). However, the time needed to reach the target MAP was significantly shorter in the SNP group than in the DEX group. End-tidal isoflurane concentration and intraoperative fentanyl consumption were significantly lower in the DEX group than in the SNP group, and the quality of the surgical field was better in the DEX group compared with the SNP group, but the time for recovery was significantly longer in the DEX group than in the SNP group. Conclusion We concluded that DEX is an effective and safe agent with anesthetic benefits for controlled hypotension, and that compared with SNP DEX offers the advantage of better quality of the surgical field and decreased anesthetic and fentanyl requirements intraoperatively. However, DEX was associated with significantly longer time to reach the target MAP and delayed recovery from anesthesia compared with SNP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颌面部手术中故意降压麻醉:右美托咪定与硝普钠的比较研究
本研究的目的是评价右美托咪定(DEX)与硝普钠(SNP)在颌面部手术中的麻醉特性,如所需降压的发生、手术视野的质量、吸入麻醉的百分比、术中芬太尼的消耗、恢复时间和不良事件。患者和方法70例ASA I级或II级患者,年龄20 ~ 60岁,计划行颌面外科手术,随机分为两组:一组在麻醉诱导前注射1 mg/kg的地敏酮,持续麻醉10 min以上,另一组在维持过程中注射0.2 ~ 0.5 mg/kg/h(地敏酮组;n = 35例患者)或诱导麻醉后滴注SNP 0.25 mg/kg/min (SNP组;n = 35例患者)维持平均动脉血压(MAP)在50 - 65 mmHg之间。记录血流动力学变量和潮末异氟醚浓度,由同一位盲定降压药的外科医生评估手术视野质量,记录术中芬太尼消耗和恢复时间。结果DEX组患者心率明显降低(P < 0.05)。两种药物均能有效达到预期的低血压水平(MAP: 50-65 mmHg)。然而,SNP组到达目标MAP所需的时间明显短于DEX组。DEX组患者潮末异氟醚浓度和术中芬太尼用量均显著低于SNP组,术野质量优于SNP组,但恢复时间明显长于SNP组。结论DEX是一种有效安全的药物,具有良好的麻醉效果,可用于控制低血压,与SNP相比,DEX具有更好的手术野质量,术中麻醉和芬太尼用量减少的优势。然而,与SNP相比,DEX与更长的到达MAP目标的时间和延迟的麻醉恢复相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of early postoperative hypoxemia: a comparative performance of Hudson face mask with nasal prongs Aprepitant for attenuation of postoperative nausea and vomiting with a decrease in postoperative analgesic needs after laparoscopic surgery Awake orotracheal intubation using fiberoptic bronchoscope versus Airtraq laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients Tramadol versus hyoscine-N-butylbromide as intrapartum analgesics during the first stage of labor Effect of dexmedetomidine infusion on desflurane requirement and perioperative hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic gastric sleeve operations: a study based on entropy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1