Thermal Versus Super Voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency of Stellate Ganglion in PostMastectomy Neuropathic Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Dina Nabil Abbass
{"title":"Thermal Versus Super Voltage Pulsed\nRadiofrequency of Stellate Ganglion in PostMastectomy Neuropathic Pain Syndrome: A\nProspective Randomized Trial","authors":"Dina Nabil Abbass","doi":"10.36076/ppj.2018.4.351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Breast cancer is the second most common cancer world-wide following lung\ncancer. Post-mastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) is one of the chronic post-surgical pain disorders\n(CPSP) of neuropathic character; nearly 20–50% of patients may develop PMPS. Stellate ganglion\nblockade has been performed as a diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic intervention for different\npain syndromes.\nObjective: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of thermal\nversus super voltage pulsed radiofrequency (RF) application of stellate ganglion in neuropathic\nPMPS in cancer patients.\nStudy Design: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, and controlled trial.\nMethods: Eighty patients with PMPS after surgery for breast cancer were recruited from the pain\nclinic of the National Cancer Institute with pain duration of more than 6 months and less than 2\nyears, visual analog scale (VAS) ≥ 40 mm, and not responding to oxycodone and pregabalin for at\nleast 4 weeks. The pain had to be of positive neuropathic character, as detected by the grading\nsystem for neuropathic pain (GSNP; score of 3 or 4). The patients were allocated into 2 equally\nsized groups:\nGroup A: Pulsed RF; super voltage pulsed RF was applied with a time of 360 seconds at 42º C, with\na pulse width of 20 m/sec and voltage of 60–70 v.\nGroup B: Thermal RF; thermal RF neurolysis was applied with a time of 60 seconds at 80º C, and\nwas then was repeated twice after needle-tip rotation. Stellate ganglion RF therapy was done\nunder fluoroscopy, integrated by ultrasound guidance. The patients were assessed for pain relief\nby change in VAS score, functional improvement, and the analgesic concomitant medication\n(oxycodone and pregabalin) consumption prior to block and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks thereafter.\nThe impact of treatment on quality of life (assessed by short-form health survey questionnaire [SF36]) and patient function capacity (assessed by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG])\nwere also recorded.\nResults: The percentage of patients who had successful response was significantly higher in the\nthermal RF group compared to the pulsed RF group at the first week and first, third, and sixth months,\nwith significant difference in post-mastectomy pain intensity, functional improvement, and less rescue\nanalgesia. There was no significant difference in quality of life or patient functional capacity.\nLimitations: A longer follow-up period may be needed for the evaluation of RF effect on PMPS.\nConclusions: Thermal RF of the stellate ganglion is a safe and successful treatment for PMPS. It\nappears to be more effective than pulsed RF of the stellate ganglion in this pain syndrome.\nKey words: Cancer breast, post mastectomy pain syndrome, stellate ganglion block,\nradiofrequency therapy","PeriodicalId":13063,"journal":{"name":"Hygeia J. D.Med.10 (1) August 2018 - January 2019","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygeia J. D.Med.10 (1) August 2018 - January 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2018.4.351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the second most common cancer world-wide following lung cancer. Post-mastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) is one of the chronic post-surgical pain disorders (CPSP) of neuropathic character; nearly 20–50% of patients may develop PMPS. Stellate ganglion blockade has been performed as a diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic intervention for different pain syndromes. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of thermal versus super voltage pulsed radiofrequency (RF) application of stellate ganglion in neuropathic PMPS in cancer patients. Study Design: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, and controlled trial. Methods: Eighty patients with PMPS after surgery for breast cancer were recruited from the pain clinic of the National Cancer Institute with pain duration of more than 6 months and less than 2 years, visual analog scale (VAS) ≥ 40 mm, and not responding to oxycodone and pregabalin for at least 4 weeks. The pain had to be of positive neuropathic character, as detected by the grading system for neuropathic pain (GSNP; score of 3 or 4). The patients were allocated into 2 equally sized groups: Group A: Pulsed RF; super voltage pulsed RF was applied with a time of 360 seconds at 42º C, with a pulse width of 20 m/sec and voltage of 60–70 v. Group B: Thermal RF; thermal RF neurolysis was applied with a time of 60 seconds at 80º C, and was then was repeated twice after needle-tip rotation. Stellate ganglion RF therapy was done under fluoroscopy, integrated by ultrasound guidance. The patients were assessed for pain relief by change in VAS score, functional improvement, and the analgesic concomitant medication (oxycodone and pregabalin) consumption prior to block and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks thereafter. The impact of treatment on quality of life (assessed by short-form health survey questionnaire [SF36]) and patient function capacity (assessed by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG]) were also recorded. Results: The percentage of patients who had successful response was significantly higher in the thermal RF group compared to the pulsed RF group at the first week and first, third, and sixth months, with significant difference in post-mastectomy pain intensity, functional improvement, and less rescue analgesia. There was no significant difference in quality of life or patient functional capacity. Limitations: A longer follow-up period may be needed for the evaluation of RF effect on PMPS. Conclusions: Thermal RF of the stellate ganglion is a safe and successful treatment for PMPS. It appears to be more effective than pulsed RF of the stellate ganglion in this pain syndrome. Key words: Cancer breast, post mastectomy pain syndrome, stellate ganglion block, radiofrequency therapy
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳房切除术后神经性疼痛综合征的星状神经节热与超电压脉冲射频:一项前瞻性随机试验
背景:乳腺癌是世界范围内仅次于肺癌的第二大常见癌症。乳房切除术后疼痛综合征(PMPS)是一种具有神经性特征的慢性术后疼痛障碍(CPSP);近20-50%的患者可能会出现经前症候群。星状神经节阻滞已被作为诊断、预后或治疗干预不同的疼痛综合征。目的:评价和比较星状神经节热疗与超电压脉冲射频(RF)治疗肿瘤神经性pmps患者的疗效和安全性。研究设计:前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验。方法:从美国国家癌症研究所疼痛门诊招募80例乳腺癌术后PMPS患者,疼痛持续时间大于6个月,小于2年,视觉模拟评分(VAS)≥40 mm,羟考酮和普瑞巴林至少4周无反应。疼痛必须是阳性的神经性特征,由神经性疼痛分级系统(GSNP;评分为3或4)。将患者分为2个大小相等的组:A组:脉冲射频;在42ºC条件下,脉冲宽度20 m/秒,电压60-70 v,施加时间360秒的超高压脉冲射频;在80ºC下应用热射频神经松解术,时间为60秒,然后在针尖旋转后重复两次。星状神经节射频治疗在透视下进行,结合超声引导。评估患者在阻断前和阻断后1、4、12和24周的VAS评分、功能改善和镇痛伴随药物(羟考酮和普瑞巴林)消耗的疼痛缓解变化。还记录了治疗对生活质量(通过简短健康调查问卷[SF36]评估)和患者功能能力(通过东部肿瘤合作小组[ECOG]评估)的影响。结果:与脉冲射频组相比,热射频组在第一周、第1个月、第3个月和第6个月成功缓解的患者百分比明显更高,在乳房切除术后疼痛强度、功能改善和较少的救援性镇痛方面存在显著差异。两组患者的生活质量和功能能力无显著差异。局限性:可能需要更长的随访期来评估射频对PMPS的影响。结论:星状神经节热射频治疗PMPS是一种安全、成功的治疗方法。在这种疼痛综合征中,它似乎比星状神经节脉冲射频更有效。关键词:癌性乳腺癌,乳房切除术后疼痛综合征,星状神经节阻滞,射频治疗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oelzes Goethe Frontmatter Rezensionen und Reaktionen zur Ausgabe des Benn-Oelze-Briefwechsels Inhalt Population genetic structure of the endangered yellow spotted mountain newt (Neurergus derjugini: Amphibia, Caudata) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1