The cutoff value for the diameter of the saphenous vein in predicting the presence of venous insufficiency

M. Durmaz, Bora Özbakır, H. Cebeci, S. Arslan, Funda Gökgöz Durmaz, F. Arslan, A. Tekin, I. Tolu
{"title":"The cutoff value for the diameter of the saphenous vein in predicting the presence of venous insufficiency","authors":"M. Durmaz, Bora Özbakır, H. Cebeci, S. Arslan, Funda Gökgöz Durmaz, F. Arslan, A. Tekin, I. Tolu","doi":"10.5455/JTOMC.2017.12.160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: In this study aimed to investigate the relationship between saphenous vein diameters and reflux and to present their sensitivity and specificity values in predicting venous insufficiency (VI). Material and Methods: This study included 162 symptomatic patients admitted to our radiology clinic with complaints of VI in 317 of their lower extremities (LEs) and 67 asymptomatic healthy volunteers with their 134 LEs having no varicose veins. A total of 451 LEs were evaluated for VI with Doppler ultrasonography (US) in the standing position. Results: The saphenous vein diameters were higher at a statistically significant level in the symptomatic patient group than in the asymptomatic healthy volunteers (p<0.001). They were also higher at a statistically significant level in the LEs with clinically significant reflux (p<0.001). A cutoff value of a 5.35 mm diameter for insufficiency in great saphenous vein (GSV) led to 80.20% sensitivity and 79.20% specificity; a 4.85 mm diameter for insufficiency in small saphenous vein (SSV) led to 82.10% sensitivity and 83.60% specificity. Conclusions: A GSV diameter of ≥ 5.35 mm and a SSV diameter of ≥ 4.85 mm are the best cutoff values, which could be used as an additional parameter, for predicting VI with high sensitivity and specificity.","PeriodicalId":17427,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Turgut Ozal Medical Center","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Turgut Ozal Medical Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JTOMC.2017.12.160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aim: In this study aimed to investigate the relationship between saphenous vein diameters and reflux and to present their sensitivity and specificity values in predicting venous insufficiency (VI). Material and Methods: This study included 162 symptomatic patients admitted to our radiology clinic with complaints of VI in 317 of their lower extremities (LEs) and 67 asymptomatic healthy volunteers with their 134 LEs having no varicose veins. A total of 451 LEs were evaluated for VI with Doppler ultrasonography (US) in the standing position. Results: The saphenous vein diameters were higher at a statistically significant level in the symptomatic patient group than in the asymptomatic healthy volunteers (p<0.001). They were also higher at a statistically significant level in the LEs with clinically significant reflux (p<0.001). A cutoff value of a 5.35 mm diameter for insufficiency in great saphenous vein (GSV) led to 80.20% sensitivity and 79.20% specificity; a 4.85 mm diameter for insufficiency in small saphenous vein (SSV) led to 82.10% sensitivity and 83.60% specificity. Conclusions: A GSV diameter of ≥ 5.35 mm and a SSV diameter of ≥ 4.85 mm are the best cutoff values, which could be used as an additional parameter, for predicting VI with high sensitivity and specificity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测静脉功能不全存在的隐静脉直径临界值
目的:本研究旨在探讨隐静脉直径与反流之间的关系,并探讨其在预测静脉功能不全(VI)方面的敏感性和特异性。材料与方法:本研究纳入162例有症状的患者,其中317例下肢有静脉功能不全(VI), 67例无症状的健康志愿者,其134例下肢无静脉曲张。采用站立位多普勒超声(US)对451例le进行VI评估。结果:有症状患者组隐静脉直径高于无症状健康志愿者,差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。在临床上有明显反流的LEs患者中,它们也高于有统计学意义的水平(p<0.001)。大隐静脉(GSV)功能不全的临界值为直径5.35 mm,敏感性为80.20%,特异性为79.20%;小隐静脉(SSV)功能不全,直径4.85 mm,敏感性82.10%,特异性83.60%。结论:GSV直径≥5.35 mm和SSV直径≥4.85 mm为最佳截断值,可作为预测VI的附加参数,具有较高的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A significant danger to children: foreign body ingestion - Successful nasotracheal intubation in a pediatric patient with Goldenhar's Syndrome using McGRATHTM videolaryngoscope A case report of retrocaecal acute appendicitis with ureteral involvement due to inflammation. Pain And Quality of Life in Adults with Sickle Cell Disease The place of scoring systems for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis a retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1