Make a Match Techniques in Cooperative Learning: Innovations to Improve Student Learning Outcomes, Student Learning Activities and Teacher Performance

Viyayanti, Dwikoranto PakGuru
{"title":"Make a Match Techniques in Cooperative Learning: Innovations to Improve Student Learning Outcomes, Student Learning Activities and Teacher Performance","authors":"Viyayanti, Dwikoranto PakGuru","doi":"10.46627/SILET.V2I2.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to describe improving student learning outcomes, describe student activities, describe teacher performance after applying the make a match technique in cooperative learning. This learning improvement is carried out by classroom action research, with steps of planning, implementing, observing, revising. The research subjects were 34 students in the chemistry class of Vocational School 1 Cerme Gresik. Data were analyzed descriptively quantitatively. The results of the class average score before the action was 70. Students who scored above the Minimum Completeness Criteria (MCC) 76 were 16 students (47%) with the highest score of 92 and students who scored below the MCC were 18 students (53%) with the lowest score of 40. After taking action in cycle 1 the average grade of 79. Students who scored above or equal to the MCC were 26 students (76%) with the highest score of 100 and students who scored below the MCC were 8 students (24%) with the lowest score of 52. Cycle 2 the average grade of 84. Students who scored above the MCC were 31 students (91%) with the highest score of 100, while students who scored below the MCC as many as 3 students (9%) with the lowest score of 64. The students' attention, activity, and enthusiasm for learning increased. Teacher performance in learning has increased.","PeriodicalId":34708,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Learning and Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Learning and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46627/SILET.V2I2.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe improving student learning outcomes, describe student activities, describe teacher performance after applying the make a match technique in cooperative learning. This learning improvement is carried out by classroom action research, with steps of planning, implementing, observing, revising. The research subjects were 34 students in the chemistry class of Vocational School 1 Cerme Gresik. Data were analyzed descriptively quantitatively. The results of the class average score before the action was 70. Students who scored above the Minimum Completeness Criteria (MCC) 76 were 16 students (47%) with the highest score of 92 and students who scored below the MCC were 18 students (53%) with the lowest score of 40. After taking action in cycle 1 the average grade of 79. Students who scored above or equal to the MCC were 26 students (76%) with the highest score of 100 and students who scored below the MCC were 8 students (24%) with the lowest score of 52. Cycle 2 the average grade of 84. Students who scored above the MCC were 31 students (91%) with the highest score of 100, while students who scored below the MCC as many as 3 students (9%) with the lowest score of 64. The students' attention, activity, and enthusiasm for learning increased. Teacher performance in learning has increased.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合作学习中的匹配技术:提高学生学习成果、学生学习活动和教师表现的创新
本研究的目的是描述在合作学习中运用配对技巧后对学生学习成果的改善,描述学生的活动,描述教师的表现。这种学习改进是通过课堂行动研究进行的,分为计划、实施、观察、修改等步骤。以格列西克职业学校化学班34名学生为研究对象。对数据进行描述性定量分析。行动前的班级平均成绩为70分。得分高于最低完整性标准(MCC) 76的学生有16名(47%)学生,最高得分为92分,得分低于MCC的学生有18名(53%)学生,最低得分为40分。在第一阶段采取行动后,平均成绩79分。高于或等于MCC的有26人(76%),最高100分;低于MCC的有8人(24%),最低52分。第二周期平均成绩84分。MCC以上的学生有31人(91%),最高分数为100分,而MCC以下的学生有3人(9%),最低分数为64分。学生的注意力、积极性和学习热情都提高了。教师的学习成绩有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Antithesis of Human Rater: Psychometric Responding to Shifts Competency Test Assessment Using Automation (AES System) Gender Based Teacher Directive Speech Acts in Religious Learning Process at Islamic High School Differentiated Teaching Module for Indonesian Language Based on Graphological Analysis of Letter I, R, G Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) and Digital E-Scaffolding for Special School Teachers Learning Transfer in the Workplace: An Insight Into the Missing Link in the Education and Training of Employees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1