From school strikes to webinars: Mapping the forced digitalization of Fridays for Future's activism during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Convergence (London, England) Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-24 DOI:10.1177/13548565221148112
Giuliana Sorce, Delia Dumitrica
{"title":"From school strikes to webinars: Mapping the forced digitalization of Fridays for Future's activism during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Giuliana Sorce, Delia Dumitrica","doi":"10.1177/13548565221148112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper discusses the forced digitalization of activism brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic in the case of the transnational environmental youth movement Fridays for Future (FFF). Theoretically, we engage with social movement action repertoires to study the shifts in protest tactics associated with the social restrictions during the early stages of the pandemic. A qualitative content analysis of 781 posts across all 27 national FFF Facebook pages in the European Union reveals four clusters of digital action types: digital contentious actions; online information and education; digital community engagement and online partnership development. While digital media were part of FFF's action repertoire in pre-pandemic times, our findings yield that the shift from the movement's iconic street protests to exclusively digital tactics privileges community-building and education over contentious actions, potentially softening the political impact of the movement's landmark 'school strike'. Furthermore, although timely tactical flexibility kept the movement going during country lockdowns, the forced digitalization in the early stages of the pandemic primarily recombined existing action tactics rather than innovating them.</p>","PeriodicalId":72707,"journal":{"name":"Convergence (London, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Convergence (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221148112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses the forced digitalization of activism brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic in the case of the transnational environmental youth movement Fridays for Future (FFF). Theoretically, we engage with social movement action repertoires to study the shifts in protest tactics associated with the social restrictions during the early stages of the pandemic. A qualitative content analysis of 781 posts across all 27 national FFF Facebook pages in the European Union reveals four clusters of digital action types: digital contentious actions; online information and education; digital community engagement and online partnership development. While digital media were part of FFF's action repertoire in pre-pandemic times, our findings yield that the shift from the movement's iconic street protests to exclusively digital tactics privileges community-building and education over contentious actions, potentially softening the political impact of the movement's landmark 'school strike'. Furthermore, although timely tactical flexibility kept the movement going during country lockdowns, the forced digitalization in the early stages of the pandemic primarily recombined existing action tactics rather than innovating them.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从罢课到网络研讨会:绘制 COVID-19 大流行期间 "未来星期五 "活动被迫数字化的地图。
本文以跨国环保青年运动 "未来星期五"(FFF)为例,讨论了 COVID-19 大流行所带来的行动主义被迫数字化的问题。从理论上讲,我们利用社会运动的行动再现来研究大流行病早期阶段与社会限制相关的抗议策略的转变。我们对欧盟 27 个国家的 FFF Facebook 页面上的 781 个帖子进行了定性内容分析,发现了四组数字行动类型:数字争议行动、在线信息和教育、数字社区参与和在线伙伴关系发展。虽然数字媒体在 "大流行病 "爆发前也是 "未来之友 "行动的一部分,但我们的研究结果表明,从该运动标志性的街头抗议到完全采用数字策略的转变,使社区建设和教育优先于争议行动,这可能会削弱该运动具有里程碑意义的 "罢课 "行动的政治影响。此外,虽然在国家封锁期间,及时的战术灵活性使运动得以继续,但在大流行病的早期阶段,被迫数字化主要是重新组合现有的行动策略,而不是对其进行创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From school strikes to webinars: Mapping the forced digitalization of Fridays for Future's activism during the COVID-19 pandemic. QR codes during the pandemic: Seamful quotidian placemaking Mapping an online production network: The field of 'actual play' media. "Through the digits, through the fingers": Variations on the string figure as imaginary digital medium. How to play in slow time: Embodying creativity literacies in digital learning environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1