Humor comprehension and appreciation: an analysis of Italian jokes

Sonja Heintz, G. Forabosco, Alberto Dionigi, Filippo Cioni
{"title":"Humor comprehension and appreciation: an analysis of Italian jokes","authors":"Sonja Heintz, G. Forabosco, Alberto Dionigi, Filippo Cioni","doi":"10.1515/humor-2023-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Humor comprehension and appreciation are two basic domains of humor research and central stages in humor processing. In the present study, 238 Italian adults rated 20 jokes to investigate how a humor comprehension task influences subsequent funniness ratings. Additionally, the relationships between humor comprehension and funniness were investigated for the total set of jokes, for individual jokes, and for jokes with different contents (neutral or tendentious) and difficulty (elementary or advanced). Comparing participants who performed only the funniness ratings with participants who first performed a humor comprehension task showed that funniness scores were reduced in the humor comprehension condition. Humor comprehension and funniness were positively related at the level of individual jokes, while these effects were less pronounced in the analyses across jokes. Overall, advanced-neutral jokes showed the most pronounced differences. The study thus showed that the level of analysis (individual jokes vs. aggregating across jokes), content and difficulty of jokes should be taken into account when relating humor comprehension and appreciation. Additionally, it should be considered that humor comprehension tasks can bias humor appreciation ratings. Hence, the measurement and interplay between these humor domains deserves more attention in research.","PeriodicalId":73268,"journal":{"name":"Humor (Berlin, Germany)","volume":"31 1","pages":"245 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humor (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2023-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Humor comprehension and appreciation are two basic domains of humor research and central stages in humor processing. In the present study, 238 Italian adults rated 20 jokes to investigate how a humor comprehension task influences subsequent funniness ratings. Additionally, the relationships between humor comprehension and funniness were investigated for the total set of jokes, for individual jokes, and for jokes with different contents (neutral or tendentious) and difficulty (elementary or advanced). Comparing participants who performed only the funniness ratings with participants who first performed a humor comprehension task showed that funniness scores were reduced in the humor comprehension condition. Humor comprehension and funniness were positively related at the level of individual jokes, while these effects were less pronounced in the analyses across jokes. Overall, advanced-neutral jokes showed the most pronounced differences. The study thus showed that the level of analysis (individual jokes vs. aggregating across jokes), content and difficulty of jokes should be taken into account when relating humor comprehension and appreciation. Additionally, it should be considered that humor comprehension tasks can bias humor appreciation ratings. Hence, the measurement and interplay between these humor domains deserves more attention in research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幽默理解与欣赏:意大利笑话分析
幽默理解和欣赏是幽默研究的两个基本领域,也是幽默加工的两个核心阶段。在目前的研究中,238名意大利成年人对20个笑话进行评级,以调查幽默理解任务如何影响随后的幽默评级。此外,我们还研究了笑话总数、单个笑话、不同内容(中性或有倾向性)和不同难度(初级或高级)笑话的幽默理解与滑稽程度之间的关系。将只进行幽默评价的参与者与首先进行幽默理解任务的参与者进行比较,发现在幽默理解条件下,幽默得分有所降低。在单个笑话的水平上,幽默理解和滑稽程度呈正相关,而在跨笑话的分析中,这些影响不太明显。总的来说,高级中性的笑话表现出最明显的差异。因此,研究表明,在理解和欣赏幽默时,应该考虑到笑话的分析水平(单个笑话与多个笑话的组合)、内容和难度。此外,应该考虑到幽默理解任务会对幽默欣赏评分产生偏见。因此,这些幽默域之间的测量和相互作用值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Banter as transformative practice: linguistic play and joking relationships in a UK swimming club. A general mechanism of humor: reformulating the semantic overlap The Humor Styles Questionnaire: a critique of scale construct validity and recommendations regarding individual differences in style profiles Jennifer Caplan (2023). Funny, you don’t look funny: Judaism and humor from the silent generation to millennials Villy Tsakona (2020). Recontextualising humour. rethinking the analysis and teaching of humor. De Gruyter Mouton, 229 pp.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1