Y. Sasabe, T. Nishimura, Kanako Hanaoka, Hikoyoshi Jinnai, Y. Shibui, Y. Katagiri, K. Masaki, Y. Abe, H. Kubo
{"title":"Blastocyst Transfer: Means of Overcoming Disadvantages Focused on Embryo Selection","authors":"Y. Sasabe, T. Nishimura, Kanako Hanaoka, Hikoyoshi Jinnai, Y. Shibui, Y. Katagiri, K. Masaki, Y. Abe, H. Kubo","doi":"10.1274/JMOR.20.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cleavage-stage embryos have been transferred to the uterus since the first successful in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Physiologically the embryos transferred to the uterus should be at the blastocyst stage, but cultivation to the blastocyst stage was difficult because of a poor culture environment. At the first attempt reported by Bolton et al. in 1989 [1] and 1991 [2] only 17% of embryos reached the expanded blastocyst stage and the implantation rate for blastocyst transfer (BT) was 7%. Subsequently, Menezo et al. [3] introduced a coculture system with Vero cells, with which 55(cid:150)60% of embryos reached the blastocyst stage. With the sequential medium, it is now possible to culture embryos to the blastocyst stage without feeder cells [4]. Gardner et al. [5] reported that the proportion of embryos reaching the blastocyst stage was 46.5% and the implantation rate for BT was 50.5%. Furthermore, their comparison study with conventional embryo transfer at the cleavage stage (ET) showed that the implantation rate for BT was much higher than that for ET [5].","PeriodicalId":90599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mammalian ova research","volume":"29 1","pages":"25-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mammalian ova research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1274/JMOR.20.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cleavage-stage embryos have been transferred to the uterus since the first successful in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Physiologically the embryos transferred to the uterus should be at the blastocyst stage, but cultivation to the blastocyst stage was difficult because of a poor culture environment. At the first attempt reported by Bolton et al. in 1989 [1] and 1991 [2] only 17% of embryos reached the expanded blastocyst stage and the implantation rate for blastocyst transfer (BT) was 7%. Subsequently, Menezo et al. [3] introduced a coculture system with Vero cells, with which 55(cid:150)60% of embryos reached the blastocyst stage. With the sequential medium, it is now possible to culture embryos to the blastocyst stage without feeder cells [4]. Gardner et al. [5] reported that the proportion of embryos reaching the blastocyst stage was 46.5% and the implantation rate for BT was 50.5%. Furthermore, their comparison study with conventional embryo transfer at the cleavage stage (ET) showed that the implantation rate for BT was much higher than that for ET [5].