Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees

IF 2.9 Q2 ETHICS Research Ethics Pub Date : 2011-09-01 DOI:10.1177/174701611100700305
L. Gelling, C. Munn-Giddings
{"title":"Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees","authors":"L. Gelling, C. Munn-Giddings","doi":"10.1177/174701611100700305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Action research has repeatedly demonstrated how it can facilitate problem solving and change in many settings through a process of collaboration which is driven by the community at the heart of the research. The ethical review of action research can be challenging for action researchers and research ethics committees. This paper explores how seven ethical principles can be used by action researchers and research ethics committees as the basis for ethical review. This paper concludes by offering some suggestions for a way forward for both action researchers and research ethics committees.","PeriodicalId":38096,"journal":{"name":"Research Ethics","volume":"22 1","pages":"100 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611100700305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Action research has repeatedly demonstrated how it can facilitate problem solving and change in many settings through a process of collaboration which is driven by the community at the heart of the research. The ethical review of action research can be challenging for action researchers and research ethics committees. This paper explores how seven ethical principles can be used by action researchers and research ethics committees as the basis for ethical review. This paper concludes by offering some suggestions for a way forward for both action researchers and research ethics committees.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行动研究的伦理审查:研究人员和研究伦理委员会面临的挑战
行动研究已经多次证明,它如何能够在许多情况下通过协作过程促进问题的解决和改变,而协作过程是由研究的核心社区推动的。对行动研究人员和研究伦理委员会来说,行动研究的伦理审查可能具有挑战性。本文探讨了七项伦理原则如何被行动研究者和研究伦理委员会用作伦理审查的基础。最后,本文为行动研究者和研究伦理委员会提出了一些未来的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research Ethics
Research Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
17
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rethinking ethical reflexivity and oversight in health research through an ecosystem approach: A workshop report. Pragmatic and ethical challenges in navigating inauthentic participation in remote qualitative research. Augmenting research consent: should large language models (LLMs) be used for informed consent to clinical research? "Should researchers return individual pharmacogenomics results to participants?" A descriptive qualitative study on stakeholder perspectives involved in HIV/AIDS research and treatment in Uganda. "It just feels morally not right to Sell the data": Ethical and social perspectives on human genomic data sharing in Uganda-A phenomenological qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1