Role of Voice Handicap Index in Evaluation of Patients with Moderate to Severe Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

IF 3.4 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-21 DOI:10.1007/s12070-023-03996-8
Gopika Kalsotra, Youshita Mahajan, Aditya Saraf, Parmod Kalsotra
{"title":"Role of Voice Handicap Index in Evaluation of Patients with Moderate to Severe Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss.","authors":"Gopika Kalsotra, Youshita Mahajan, Aditya Saraf, Parmod Kalsotra","doi":"10.1007/s12070-023-03996-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our ability to hear and speak enables us to communicate with others, forming an integral part of our emotional and social well-being. Vocal problems in hearing-impaired patients have yet to be assessed in terms of subjective level of disability they cause. Present study aims to assess the different Voice Handicap Index (VHI) scores among patients with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss and compare them to those with normal hearing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective case control study(n = 150), study group A (n = 100) consisted of subjects with bilateral moderate to profound hearing loss on Pure tone audiometry and control group B (n = 50) with normal hearing. Both groups were asked to fill out VHI form after a normal videostroboscopic assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean VHI score in group A was 57.5 ± 12.48 and 6.0 ± 3.24 in group B, difference being statistically significant. A strong positive correlation was found between severity of hearing loss and VHI total score. The difference between both groups was also statistically significant for each of the three subscales of VHI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We infer that subjects with moderate and higher bilateral sensorineural hearing loss hearing have statistically significant higher VHI scores as compared to those with normal hearing. It was observed that perception of voice handicap increased with the severity of hearing loss. These findings emphasize the need for multilateral assessment and treatment of voice disorders in subjects with hearing loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":48095,"journal":{"name":"Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly","volume":"65 1","pages":"3320-3325"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-03996-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Our ability to hear and speak enables us to communicate with others, forming an integral part of our emotional and social well-being. Vocal problems in hearing-impaired patients have yet to be assessed in terms of subjective level of disability they cause. Present study aims to assess the different Voice Handicap Index (VHI) scores among patients with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss and compare them to those with normal hearing.

Materials and methods: In this prospective case control study(n = 150), study group A (n = 100) consisted of subjects with bilateral moderate to profound hearing loss on Pure tone audiometry and control group B (n = 50) with normal hearing. Both groups were asked to fill out VHI form after a normal videostroboscopic assessment.

Results: Mean VHI score in group A was 57.5 ± 12.48 and 6.0 ± 3.24 in group B, difference being statistically significant. A strong positive correlation was found between severity of hearing loss and VHI total score. The difference between both groups was also statistically significant for each of the three subscales of VHI.

Conclusion: We infer that subjects with moderate and higher bilateral sensorineural hearing loss hearing have statistically significant higher VHI scores as compared to those with normal hearing. It was observed that perception of voice handicap increased with the severity of hearing loss. These findings emphasize the need for multilateral assessment and treatment of voice disorders in subjects with hearing loss.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嗓音障碍指数在评价中重度双侧感音神经性听力损失患者中的作用。
背景:我们听和说的能力使我们能够与他人交流,形成我们情感和社会福祉的一个组成部分。听力受损患者的声音问题还需要根据其造成的主观残疾程度进行评估。本研究旨在评估中重度感音神经性听力损失患者的不同语音障碍指数(VHI)评分,并将其与正常听力患者进行比较。材料与方法:本前瞻性病例对照研究(n = 150), A组(n = 100)由纯音听力测量双侧中度至重度听力损失的受试者组成,B组(n = 50)由听力正常的受试者组成。两组都被要求在正常的频闪评估后填写VHI表格。结果:A组平均VHI评分为57.5±12.48分,B组平均VHI评分为6.0±3.24分,差异有统计学意义。听力损失严重程度与VHI总分呈正相关。两组之间的差异在VHI的三个分量表中也有统计学意义。结论:我们推断中度和重度双侧感音神经性听力损失受试者的VHI评分高于听力正常者,具有统计学意义。观察到,随着听力损失的严重程度,声音障碍的感知增加。这些发现强调了对听力损失患者嗓音障碍进行多边评估和治疗的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly focuses on research in journalism and mass communication. Each issue features reports of original investigation, presenting the latest developments in theory and methodology of communication, international communication, journalism history, and social and legal problems. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly also contains book reviews. Refereed. Published four times a year.
期刊最新文献
The Perceptions of Nuclear War: The Imbalanced Co-Orientation Between Russian and American Youth The Effect of Interactivity in Immersive Journalism on Participating In the Media and Through the Media The Impact of the 2020 BLM Resurgence on the Racial Representations of Ads and Ad Evaluations: Analysis of Super Bowl Ads Book Review: The Handbook on Religion and Communication, by Yoel Cohen and Paul Soukup, eds Book Review: Life in Media. A Global Introduction to Media Studies, by Mark Deuze
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1