Efectividad del tratamiento homeopático en el manejo de las hemorroides: estudio prospectivo observacional controlado en farmacia comunitaria

Montserrat Gil , Marian March , María Rubio
{"title":"Efectividad del tratamiento homeopático en el manejo de las hemorroides: estudio prospectivo observacional controlado en farmacia comunitaria","authors":"Montserrat Gil ,&nbsp;Marian March ,&nbsp;María Rubio","doi":"10.1016/j.homeo.2016.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>Haemorrhoids are a frequent complaint that can be treated with homeopathy, but effectiveness of this treatment has not been evaluated. The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of treating haemorrhoids with homeopathic treatment (intervention group) compared to usual care (control group).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A non-randomised, controlled, prospective study was conducted on patients (&gt; 18 years, without cognitive impairment) with haemorrhoids, of which 21 were assigned to receive usual care and 32 homeopathic treatment, on the basis of their preference and regular practice in 14 community pharmacies in Girona, Spain (May-August 2013). At baseline, 15 days, and 30 days, pain and itch were measured using visual analogue scales (VAS), and quality of life was measured using the EUROQoL-5D and VAS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The usual care patients were more likely to be using other treatments for haemorrhoids at baseline (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). Both groups showed a general improvement in the symptoms. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of relief of itching, reduction in the level of pain, or improvement in the quality of life. Statistical power was only adequate in the analysis of the reduction of pain. Only 55% of patients suffering the condition for more than 10 years had visited a physician for their haemorrhoids.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The sample size was limited and there were confounding factors (use of other medications) that may have limited the possibility of detecting differences. Randomised controlled studies, with a longer follow-up period and a larger sample size, should be carried out before making systematic recommendations concerning these treatments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101115,"journal":{"name":"Revista Médica de Homeopatía","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 41-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.homeo.2016.07.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Médica de Homeopatía","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888852616300224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

Haemorrhoids are a frequent complaint that can be treated with homeopathy, but effectiveness of this treatment has not been evaluated. The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of treating haemorrhoids with homeopathic treatment (intervention group) compared to usual care (control group).

Methods

A non-randomised, controlled, prospective study was conducted on patients (> 18 years, without cognitive impairment) with haemorrhoids, of which 21 were assigned to receive usual care and 32 homeopathic treatment, on the basis of their preference and regular practice in 14 community pharmacies in Girona, Spain (May-August 2013). At baseline, 15 days, and 30 days, pain and itch were measured using visual analogue scales (VAS), and quality of life was measured using the EUROQoL-5D and VAS.

Results

The usual care patients were more likely to be using other treatments for haemorrhoids at baseline (P < .05). Both groups showed a general improvement in the symptoms. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of relief of itching, reduction in the level of pain, or improvement in the quality of life. Statistical power was only adequate in the analysis of the reduction of pain. Only 55% of patients suffering the condition for more than 10 years had visited a physician for their haemorrhoids.

Conclusions

The sample size was limited and there were confounding factors (use of other medications) that may have limited the possibility of detecting differences. Randomised controlled studies, with a longer follow-up period and a larger sample size, should be carried out before making systematic recommendations concerning these treatments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
顺势疗法治疗痔疮的有效性:社区药房的前瞻性观察对照研究
简介和目的痔疮是一种常见的疾病,可以用顺势疗法治疗,但这种治疗的有效性尚未得到评估。目的是评价顺势疗法治疗痔疮(干预组)与常规治疗(对照组)的效果。方法采用非随机、对照、前瞻性研究对患者(>18岁,无认知障碍)痔疮患者,其中21人接受常规护理,32人接受顺势疗法治疗,根据他们的偏好和在西班牙赫罗纳14个社区药房的常规做法(2013年5月至8月)。在基线、15天和30天,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量疼痛和瘙痒,使用EUROQoL-5D和VAS测量生活质量。结果常规护理患者在基线时更有可能使用其他治疗方法治疗痔疮(P <. 05)。两组患者的症状均有所改善。在缓解瘙痒、减轻疼痛程度或改善生活质量方面,两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。只有在疼痛减轻的分析中,统计能力才足够。在患有痔疮10年以上的患者中,只有55%的人因为痔疮去看过医生。结论样本量有限,存在混杂因素(使用其他药物),可能限制了发现差异的可能性。在对这些治疗提出系统建议之前,应进行随访期较长、样本量较大的随机对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quiste pulmonar gigante en lactante, manejo y resolución no quirúrgica a dos años de seguimiento Encefalocele naso-etmoidal: reporte de caso Cirugía de Trastornos del Movimiento en Guatemala: reporte de dos casos Lipoblastoma retroperitoneal: reporte de caso Neuroimagen en la esclerosis lateral amiotrófica: hallazgos en resonancia magnética cerebral. Informe de caso
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1