Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes of Late-Acquired Stent Malapposition After Coronary Stent Implantation.

Seung‐Yul Lee, Jung‐Min Ahn, G. Mintz, Sung‐Jin Hong, C. Ahn, Duk‐Woo Park, Jung‐Sun Kim, Byeong‐Keuk Kim, Y. Ko, D. Choi, Y. Jang, Seung‐Jung Park, M. Hong
{"title":"Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes of Late-Acquired Stent Malapposition After Coronary Stent Implantation.","authors":"Seung‐Yul Lee, Jung‐Min Ahn, G. Mintz, Sung‐Jin Hong, C. Ahn, Duk‐Woo Park, Jung‐Sun Kim, Byeong‐Keuk Kim, Y. Ko, D. Choi, Y. Jang, Seung‐Jung Park, M. Hong","doi":"10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThe goal of this study was to determine the impact of late-acquired stent malapposition (LASM) on long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with coronary stent implantation. Approach and Results: We investigated major adverse cardiac event during 10 years after 6-month intravascular ultrasound examination using our previous studies database. A total of 732 patients treated with bare-metal stent (54 LASM versus 678 non-LASM) and 529 patients treated with first-generation drug-eluting stent (82 LASM versus 447 non-LASM), who did not have clinical event or censoring at the time of follow-up intravascular ultrasound, were included for the present analysis. major adverse cardiac event was defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis. Multivariable adjustment and inverse probability weight were performed to consider baseline differences. After multivariable adjustment, LASM was related to a greater risk of major adverse cardiac event (hazard ratio, 1.666 [95% CI, 1.041-2.665]; P=0.0333) and very-late stent thrombosis (hazard ratio, 3.529 [95% CI, 1.153-10.798]; P=0.0271) than non-LASM in patients treated with first-generation drug-eluting stent, but not in those treated with bare-metal stent. Results were consistent after inverse probability weight. Among patients with LASM of first-generation drug-eluting stent, no late stent thrombosis occurred in patients who continued to receive dual antiplatelet therapy.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe relationship between LASM and major adverse cardiac event might depend on the type of implanted stents during the long-term follow-up, highlighting the clinical significance of polymers and drugs in drug-eluting stent system.","PeriodicalId":8404,"journal":{"name":"Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, & Vascular Biology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, & Vascular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to determine the impact of late-acquired stent malapposition (LASM) on long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with coronary stent implantation. Approach and Results: We investigated major adverse cardiac event during 10 years after 6-month intravascular ultrasound examination using our previous studies database. A total of 732 patients treated with bare-metal stent (54 LASM versus 678 non-LASM) and 529 patients treated with first-generation drug-eluting stent (82 LASM versus 447 non-LASM), who did not have clinical event or censoring at the time of follow-up intravascular ultrasound, were included for the present analysis. major adverse cardiac event was defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis. Multivariable adjustment and inverse probability weight were performed to consider baseline differences. After multivariable adjustment, LASM was related to a greater risk of major adverse cardiac event (hazard ratio, 1.666 [95% CI, 1.041-2.665]; P=0.0333) and very-late stent thrombosis (hazard ratio, 3.529 [95% CI, 1.153-10.798]; P=0.0271) than non-LASM in patients treated with first-generation drug-eluting stent, but not in those treated with bare-metal stent. Results were consistent after inverse probability weight. Among patients with LASM of first-generation drug-eluting stent, no late stent thrombosis occurred in patients who continued to receive dual antiplatelet therapy. CONCLUSIONS The relationship between LASM and major adverse cardiac event might depend on the type of implanted stents during the long-term follow-up, highlighting the clinical significance of polymers and drugs in drug-eluting stent system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉支架植入术后迟发性支架错位10年临床观察。
目的本研究的目的是确定晚期获得性支架错位(LASM)对冠状动脉支架植入术患者长期临床结果的影响。方法和结果:我们利用先前的研究数据库,在6个月血管内超声检查后,调查了10年内主要的不良心脏事件。本研究共纳入732例裸金属支架患者(54例LASM vs 678例非LASM)和529例第一代药物洗脱支架患者(82例LASM vs 447例非LASM),这些患者在随访血管内超声时没有临床事件或检查。主要心脏不良事件定义为心源性死亡、靶血管相关性心肌梗死、靶病变血运重建和支架内血栓形成的复合事件。采用多变量调整和逆概率加权来考虑基线差异。多变量调整后,LASM与较大的主要心脏不良事件风险相关(危险比为1.666 [95% CI, 1.041-2.665];P=0.0333)和极晚期支架血栓形成(风险比,3.529 [95% CI, 1.153-10.798];P=0.0271),第一代药物洗脱支架组患者比非lasm组明显增高,而裸金属支架组的差异不明显。反概率加权后结果一致。在第一代药物洗脱支架LASM患者中,继续接受双重抗血小板治疗的患者未发生晚期支架血栓形成。结论LASM与主要心脏不良事件的关系可能与长期随访中植入支架的类型有关,突出了聚合物和药物在药物洗脱支架系统中的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editors and Editorial Board. Correction to: Role of LpL (Lipoprotein Lipase) in Macrophage Polarization In Vitro and In Vivo. Tribute to Paul M. Vanhoutte, MD, PhD (1940-2019). Correction to: 18F-Sodium Fluoride Imaging of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Ambulatory Patients With Diabetes Mellitus. Extracellular MicroRNA-92a Mediates Endothelial Cell-Macrophage Communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1