Development of cardiotoxicity model using ligand-centric and receptor-centric descriptors

C. Patel, Sivakumar Prasanth Kumar, R. Rawal, M. Thaker, H. Pandya
{"title":"Development of cardiotoxicity model using ligand-centric and receptor-centric descriptors","authors":"C. Patel, Sivakumar Prasanth Kumar, R. Rawal, M. Thaker, H. Pandya","doi":"10.1177/2397847320971259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bioinformatics and statistical analysis have been employed to develop a classification model to distinguish toxic and non-toxic molecules. Aims: The primary objective of this study is to enumerate the cut-off values of various physico-chemical (ligand-centric) and target interaction (receptor-centric) descriptors which forms the basis for classifying cardiotoxic and non-toxic molecules. We also sought correlation of molecular docking, absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicology (ADMET) parameters, Lipinski rules, physico-chemical parameters, etc. of human cardiotoxicity drugs. Methods: A training and test set of 91 compounds were applied to linear discriminant analysis (LDA) using 2D and 3D descriptors as discriminating variables representing various molecular modeling parameters to identify which function of descriptor type is responsible for cardiotoxicity. Internal validation was performed using the leave-one-out cross-validation methodology ensuing in good results, assuring the stability of the discriminant function (DF). Results: The values of the statistical parameters Fisher Discriminant Analysis (FDA) and Wilk’s λ for the DF showed reliable statistical significance, as long as the success rate in the prediction for both the training and the test set attained more than 93% accuracy, 87.50% sensitivity and 94.74% specificity. Conclusion: The predictive model was built using a hybrid approach using organ-specific targets for docking and ADMET properties for the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved and withdrawn drugs. Classifiers were developed by linear discriminant analysis and the cut-off was enumerated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis to achieve reliable specificity and sensitivity.","PeriodicalId":23155,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Research and Application","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Research and Application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2397847320971259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bioinformatics and statistical analysis have been employed to develop a classification model to distinguish toxic and non-toxic molecules. Aims: The primary objective of this study is to enumerate the cut-off values of various physico-chemical (ligand-centric) and target interaction (receptor-centric) descriptors which forms the basis for classifying cardiotoxic and non-toxic molecules. We also sought correlation of molecular docking, absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicology (ADMET) parameters, Lipinski rules, physico-chemical parameters, etc. of human cardiotoxicity drugs. Methods: A training and test set of 91 compounds were applied to linear discriminant analysis (LDA) using 2D and 3D descriptors as discriminating variables representing various molecular modeling parameters to identify which function of descriptor type is responsible for cardiotoxicity. Internal validation was performed using the leave-one-out cross-validation methodology ensuing in good results, assuring the stability of the discriminant function (DF). Results: The values of the statistical parameters Fisher Discriminant Analysis (FDA) and Wilk’s λ for the DF showed reliable statistical significance, as long as the success rate in the prediction for both the training and the test set attained more than 93% accuracy, 87.50% sensitivity and 94.74% specificity. Conclusion: The predictive model was built using a hybrid approach using organ-specific targets for docking and ADMET properties for the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved and withdrawn drugs. Classifiers were developed by linear discriminant analysis and the cut-off was enumerated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis to achieve reliable specificity and sensitivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用配体中心和受体中心描述符建立心脏毒性模型
背景:利用生物信息学和统计分析方法建立了一种区分有毒和无毒分子的分类模型。目的:本研究的主要目的是列举各种物理化学(以配体为中心)和靶标相互作用(以受体为中心)描述符的截止值,这些描述符构成了心脏毒性和无毒分子分类的基础。我们还寻求人类心脏毒性药物的分子对接、吸收、分布、代谢、排泄和毒理学(ADMET)参数、Lipinski规则、理化参数等的相关性。方法:将91个化合物的训练和测试集应用于线性判别分析(LDA),使用2D和3D描述符作为代表各种分子建模参数的判别变量,以确定描述符类型的功能负责心脏毒性。使用留一交叉验证方法进行内部验证,结果良好,保证了判别函数(DF)的稳定性。结果:只要训练集和测试集的预测成功率均达到93%以上的准确率、87.50%的灵敏度和94.74%的特异性,DF的统计参数Fisher Discriminant Analysis (FDA)和Wilk’s λ的值具有可靠的统计学意义。结论:该预测模型采用混合方法建立,结合器官特异性靶点对接和ADMET特性,适用于FDA (Food and Drug Administration, FDA)批准和撤销的药物。采用线性判别分析建立分类器,采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析列举截止值,达到可靠的特异性和敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predicted aerosol dosimetry for mouse models of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease and lung cancer Banana peel extract alleviate inflammation and oxidative stress via modulation of the Nrf2/Hmox-1 and NF-κB pathways in thyroid of heavy metal mixture exposed female rats Safety evaluation of oubli fruit sweet protein (brazzein) derived from Komagataella phaffii, intended for use as a sweetener in food and beverages A randomized, open-label, cross-over pilot study investigating metabolic product kinetics of the palatable novel ketone ester, bis-octanoyl (R)-1,3-butanediol, and bis-hexanoyl (R)-1,3-butanediol ingestion in healthy adults Assessment of level of heavy metals in cosmetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1